Suppr超能文献

针对梗阻性结直肠癌患者的改良术后加速康复(ERAS)方案。

Modified enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Shida Dai, Tagawa Kyoko, Inada Kentaro, Nasu Keiichi, Seyama Yasuji, Maeshiro Tsuyoshi, Miyamoto Sachio, Inoue Satoru, Umekita Nobutaka

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045, Japan.

Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15 Koto-bashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 1308575, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0213-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are now well-known to be useful for elective colorectal surgery, as they result in shorter hospital stays without adversely affecting morbidity. However, the efficacy and safety of ERAS protocols for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer have yet to be clarified.

METHODS

We evaluated 122 consecutive resections for obstructive colorectal cancer performed between July 2008 and November 2012 at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital. Patients with rupture or impending rupture and those who received simple colostomy were excluded. The first set of 42 patients was treated based on traditional protocols, and the latter 80 according to modified ERAS protocols. The main endpoints were length of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative short-term morbidity, rate of readmission within 30 days, and mortality. Differences in modified ERAS protocols relative to traditional care include intensive preoperative counseling (by both surgeons and anesthesiologists), perioperative fluid management (avoidance of sodium/fluid overload), shortening of postoperative fasting period and early provision of oral nutrition, intraoperative warm air body heating, enforced postoperative mobilization, stimulation of gut motility, early removal of urinary catheter, and a multidisciplinary team approach to care.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) postoperative hospital stay was 10 (10-14.25) days in the traditional group, and seven (7-8.75) days in the ERAS group, showing a 3-day reduction in hospital stay (p < 0.01). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, overall incidences of grade 2 or higher postoperative complications for the traditional and ERAS groups were 15 and 10% (p = 0.48), and 30-day readmission rates were 0 and 1.3% (p = 1.00), respectively. As for mortality, one patient in the traditional group died and none in the ERAS group (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSION

Modified ERAS protocols for obstructive colorectal cancer reduced hospital stay without adversely affecting morbidity, indicating that ERAS protocols are feasible for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

摘要

背景

手术加速康复(ERAS)方案目前已广为人知,对择期结直肠癌手术很有用,因为它们能缩短住院时间且不会对发病率产生不利影响。然而,ERAS方案对梗阻性结直肠癌患者的疗效和安全性尚未明确。

方法

我们评估了2008年7月至2012年11月在东京都墨东医院连续进行的122例梗阻性结直肠癌切除术。排除有破裂或即将破裂的患者以及接受单纯结肠造口术的患者。第一组42例患者按照传统方案治疗,后80例按照改良的ERAS方案治疗。主要终点为术后住院时间、术后短期发病率、30天内再入院率和死亡率。改良的ERAS方案相对于传统治疗的差异包括强化术前咨询(由外科医生和麻醉医生共同进行)、围手术期液体管理(避免钠/液体超负荷)、缩短术后禁食期并早期提供肠内营养、术中使用暖空气进行身体加热、术后强制活动、刺激肠道蠕动、早期拔除尿管以及采用多学科团队护理方法。

结果

传统组术后住院时间的中位数(四分位间距)为10(10 - 14.25)天,ERAS组为7(7 - 8.75)天,住院时间缩短了3天(p < 0.01)。根据Clavien - Dindo分类,传统组和ERAS组术后2级或更高等级并发症的总体发生率分别为15%和10%(p = 0.48),30天再入院率分别为0和1.3%(p = 1.00)。至于死亡率,传统组有1例患者死亡,ERAS组无死亡病例(p = 0.34)。

结论

改良的ERAS方案用于梗阻性结直肠癌可缩短住院时间且不会对发病率产生不利影响,表明ERAS方案对梗阻性结直肠癌患者是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa4d/5314620/d981e30c1c69/12893_2017_213_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验