Sathananthan Dharshan, Young Edward, Nind Garry, George Biju, Ashby Angelie, Drummond Sharon, Redel Kasia, Green Neville, Singh Rajvinder
Royal Adelaide Hospital - Gastroenerology, Adelaide, South Australia.
University of Adelaide Medical School, Adelaide, South Australia.
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Feb;5(2):E110-E115. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121667.
Physician-directed nurse-administered balanced propofol sedation (PhD NAPS) in patients undergoing endoscopy and/or colonoscopy is being increasingly utilized worldwide. However, this method of sedation is not universally employed in Australian hospitals due to concerns surrounding its safety. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of PhD NAPS in low-risk patients undergoing endoscopy and/or colonoscopy. This study was conducted at a single tertiary teaching hospital in Adelaide, Australia. It was a prospective study involving 1000 patients with an ASA score of 1 - 3 presenting with any indication for endoscopy, colonoscopy or both. A total of 981 patients (451 male) with a mean age of 53 years (range: 16 - 87) were recruited from January 2010 to October 2012. 440 endoscopies, 420 colonoscopies, and 121 combined procedures were performed. The intra-procedural adverse events (AEs) were recorded. There were no major intra-procedural adverse events. Minor AEs occurred in 6.42 % of patients, and resolved spontaneously or with intravenous fluid boluses in all cases. PhD NAPS is safe when the proceduralist and nursing staff are adequately trained and strict patient selection criteria are used.
由医生指导护士实施的丙泊酚平衡镇静(PhD NAPS)在内镜检查和/或结肠镜检查患者中的应用在全球范围内越来越广泛。然而,由于对其安全性的担忧,这种镇静方法在澳大利亚医院并未普遍采用。本研究的目的是评估PhD NAPS在接受内镜检查和/或结肠镜检查的低风险患者中的安全性。
本研究在澳大利亚阿德莱德的一家三级教学医院进行。这是一项前瞻性研究,涉及1000例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分为1-3分、有任何内镜检查、结肠镜检查或两者指征的患者。从2010年1月至2012年10月共招募了981例患者(451例男性),平均年龄53岁(范围:16-87岁)。进行了440例内镜检查、420例结肠镜检查和121例联合检查。记录了术中不良事件(AE)。
术中无重大不良事件。6.42%的患者发生轻微不良事件,所有病例均自行缓解或通过静脉推注液体缓解。
当操作医生和护理人员接受充分培训并使用严格的患者选择标准时,PhD NAPS是安全的。