Shephard Roy J
Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
, PO Box 521, Brackendale, BC, V0N 1H0, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Mar;117(3):381-387. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3556-6. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
The Douglas bag technique is reviewed as one in a series of articles looking at historical insights into measurement of whole body metabolic rate. Consideration of all articles looking at Douglas bag technique and chemical gas analysis has here focused on the growing appreciation of errors in measuring expired volumes and gas composition, and subjective reactions to airflow resistance and dead space. Multiple small sources of error have been identified and appropriate remedies proposed over a century of use of the methodology. Changes in the bag lining have limited gas diffusion, laboratories conducting gas analyses have undergone validation, and WHO guidelines on airflow resistance have minimized reactive effects. One remaining difficulty is a contamination of expirate by dead space air, minimized by keeping the dead space <70 mL. Care must also be taken to ensure a steady state, and formal validation of the Douglas bag method still needs to be carried out. We may conclude that the Douglas bag method has helped to define key concepts in exercise physiology. Although now superceded in many applications, the errors in a meticulously completed measurement are sufficiently low to warrant retention of the Douglas bag as the gold standard when evaluating newer open-circuit methodology.
作为一系列探讨全身代谢率测量历史见解的文章之一,本文对道格拉斯袋技术进行了综述。对所有涉及道格拉斯袋技术和化学气体分析的文章的考量,聚焦于对测量呼出气体体积和气体成分时误差的日益重视,以及对气流阻力和死腔的主观反应。在该方法使用的一个多世纪里,已识别出多个小误差源并提出了相应的补救措施。袋衬里的变化限制了气体扩散,进行气体分析的实验室已经过验证,世界卫生组织关于气流阻力的指南已将反应性影响降至最低。一个遗留的难题是死腔空气对呼出气体的污染,通过保持死腔小于70毫升可将其降至最低。还必须注意确保达到稳定状态,并且道格拉斯袋方法仍需进行正式验证。我们可以得出结论,道格拉斯袋方法有助于界定运动生理学中的关键概念。尽管现在在许多应用中已被取代,但精心完成测量时的误差足够低,足以保证在评估更新的开路方法时,将道格拉斯袋保留为金标准。