Leavitt Dean H, Marion Angela B, Hollingsworth Bradford D, Reeder Tod W
San Diego State University, United States.
San Diego State University, United States.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017 May;110:104-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
The increased availability of nuclear DNA sequence data has led to a better appreciation of the role and frequency of introgressive hybridization and subsequent mitochondrial capture in misleading phylogenetic hypotheses based on mtDNA sequence data alone. Relationships among members of the alligator lizard genus Elgaria have been addressed with morphology, allozyme and mtDNA sequence data with discordant results. In this study, we use seven nuclear loci (total of 5.9kb) and ∼3kb of mtDNA to infer the phylogenetic relationships among Elgaria species and test whether the discordance among previous phylogenetic hypotheses is due to introgression and mtDNA capture. While gene tree topologies varied among the different loci, we recovered a well-resolved coalescent-based species tree. Contrary to our expectations, the nDNA-only species tree does not support the sister relationship between E. kingii and E. panamintina inferred from the previous allozyme study. Nevertheless, we found evidence for possible mitochondrial capture in two unexpected situations. The first instance of mtDNA capture involves E. paucicarinata from the Cape Region of Baja California. MtDNA recovered a clade comprising E. paucicarinata and the other two peninsular endemics, while the nDNA-only species tree recovered E. paucicarinata as sister to the continental E. kingii. We hypothesize that this discordance is the result of ancient mitochondrial capture rather than incomplete lineage sorting. Additionally, analyses of nDNA recovered E. panamintina as sister to an E. multicarinata North lineage, whereas the mtDNA gene tree recovers E. panamintina nested within a southern E. multicarinata clade. We hypothesize that this discordance also may be due to mitochondrial capture. Additionally, hybridization between these two lineages may have resulted in geographically limited nuclear introgression. Divergence dating analyses suggest that oviparous Elgaria species diverged within a relatively narrow timeframe from the late Miocene to early Pliocene. We find that accounting for introgressed alleles is important when inferring phylogenetic relationships when using coalescent-based approaches.
核DNA序列数据可用性的提高,使人们更好地认识到渐渗杂交及随后的线粒体捕获在仅基于线粒体DNA序列数据误导系统发育假设中的作用和频率。鳄蜥属(Elgaria)成员之间的关系已通过形态学、等位酶和线粒体DNA序列数据进行研究,但结果不一致。在本研究中,我们使用7个核基因座(共5.9kb)和约3kb的线粒体DNA来推断鳄蜥属物种之间的系统发育关系,并检验先前系统发育假设之间的不一致是否是由于渐渗和线粒体捕获。虽然不同基因座的基因树拓扑结构不同,但我们构建了一个分辨率良好的基于溯祖的物种树。与我们的预期相反,仅基于核DNA的物种树并不支持先前等位酶研究推断的E. kingii和E. panamintina之间的姐妹关系。然而,我们在两种意外情况下发现了可能发生线粒体捕获的证据。线粒体DNA捕获的第一个实例涉及来自下加利福尼亚州海角地区的E. paucicarinata。线粒体DNA构建的进化枝包含E. paucicarinata和其他两个半岛特有种,而仅基于核DNA的物种树将E. paucicarinata恢复为大陆E. kingii的姐妹种。我们推测这种不一致是古代线粒体捕获的结果,而非不完全谱系分选。此外,核DNA分析将E. panamintina恢复为E. multicarinata北支系的姐妹种,而线粒体DNA基因树将E. panamintina嵌套在E. multicarinata南支系进化枝中。我们推测这种不一致也可能是由于线粒体捕获。此外,这两个支系之间的杂交可能导致了地理上有限的核基因渐渗。分歧时间分析表明,卵生鳄蜥属物种在相对较窄的时间范围内从中新世晚期到上新世早期发生了分化。我们发现,在使用基于溯祖的方法推断系统发育关系时,考虑渐渗等位基因很重要。