Georgiou Roxani, Eaton Simon, Stanton Michael P, Pierro Agostino, Hall Nigel J
Department of Paediatric Surgery and Urology, Southampton Children's Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-3003. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
Nonoperative treatment (NOT) with antibiotics alone of acute uncomplicated appendicitis (AUA) in children has been proposed as an alternative to appendectomy.
To determine safety and efficacy of NOT based on current literature.
Three electronic databases.
All articles reporting NOT for AUA in children.
Two reviewers independently verified study inclusion and extracted data.
Ten articles reporting 413 children receiving NOT were included. Six, including 1 randomized controlled trial, compared NOT with appendectomy. The remaining 4 reported outcomes of children receiving NOT without a comparison group. NOT was effective as the initial treatment in 97% of children (95% confidence interval [CI] 96% to 99%). Initial length of hospital stay was shorter in children treated with appendectomy compared with NOT (mean difference 0.5 days [95% CI 0.2 to 0.8]; = .002). At final reported follow-up (range 8 weeks to 4 years), NOT remained effective (no appendectomy performed) in 82% of children (95% CI 77% to 87%). Recurrent appendicitis occurred in 14% (95% CI 7% to 21%). Complications and total length of hospital stay during follow-up were similar for NOT and appendectomy. No serious adverse events related to NOT were reported.
The lack of prospective randomized studies limits definitive conclusions to influence clinical practice.
Current data suggest that NOT is safe. It appears effective as initial treatment in 97% of children with AUA, and the rate of recurrent appendicitis is 14%. Longer-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of NOT compared with appendicectomy require further evaluation, preferably in large randomized trials, to reliably inform decision-making.
有人提出,对于儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎(AUA),仅用抗生素进行非手术治疗(NOT)可作为阑尾切除术的替代方案。
根据现有文献确定非手术治疗的安全性和有效性。
三个电子数据库。
所有报道儿童AUA非手术治疗的文章。
两名评审员独立核实研究纳入情况并提取数据。
纳入了10篇报道413名接受非手术治疗儿童的文章。其中6篇,包括1项随机对照试验,将非手术治疗与阑尾切除术进行了比较。其余4篇报道了接受非手术治疗儿童的结局,未设对照组。非手术治疗作为初始治疗对97%的儿童有效(95%置信区间[CI]96%至99%)。与非手术治疗相比,接受阑尾切除术的儿童初始住院时间更短(平均差异0.5天[95%CI 0.2至0.8];P = 0.002)。在最后一次报道的随访中(范围为8周至4年),82%的儿童非手术治疗仍然有效(未进行阑尾切除术)(95%CI 77%至87%)。复发性阑尾炎发生率为14%(95%CI 7%至21%)。非手术治疗和阑尾切除术在随访期间的并发症和总住院时间相似。未报告与非手术治疗相关的严重不良事件。
缺乏前瞻性随机研究限制了得出影响临床实践的确切结论。
目前的数据表明非手术治疗是安全的。它似乎对97%的AUA儿童作为初始治疗有效,复发性阑尾炎发生率为14%。与阑尾切除术相比,非手术治疗的长期临床结局和成本效益需要进一步评估,最好是在大型随机试验中进行,以便为决策提供可靠依据。