• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文献数据库中存在问题的论文作为文献综述的一个问题。

Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review.

作者信息

Dadkhah Mehdi, Lagzian Mohammad, Borchardt Glenn

机构信息

Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Progressive Science Institute, Box 5335, Berkeley, CA, 94705, USA.

出版信息

J Cell Commun Signal. 2017 Jun;11(2):181-185. doi: 10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6. Epub 2017 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6
PMID:28215004
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5440345/
Abstract

In recent years, the academic world has been faced with much academic misconduct. Examples involve plagiarizing papers, manipulating data, and launching predatory or hijacked journals. The literature exposing these activities is growing exponentially, and so is the presentation of criteria or guidelines for counteracting the problem. Most of the research is focused on predatory or hijacked journal detection and providing suitable warnings. Overlooked in all this is the fact that papers published in these journals are questionable, but nevertheless show up in standard citation databases. We need some way to flag them so future researchers will be aware of their questionable nature and prevent their use in literature review.

摘要

近年来,学术界面临着诸多学术不端行为。例子包括抄袭论文、操纵数据以及创办掠夺性或被劫持的期刊。揭露这些行为的文献呈指数级增长,应对该问题的标准或指南的呈现也是如此。大多数研究都集中在掠夺性或被劫持期刊的检测以及提供适当的警示上。在这一切中被忽视的一个事实是,在这些期刊上发表的论文存在问题,但却仍出现在标准的引文数据库中。我们需要某种方法来标记它们,以便未来的研究人员能够意识到它们的可疑性质,并防止在文献综述中使用它们。

相似文献

1
Questionable papers in citation databases as an issue for literature review.文献数据库中存在问题的论文作为文献综述的一个问题。
J Cell Commun Signal. 2017 Jun;11(2):181-185. doi: 10.1007/s12079-016-0370-6. Epub 2017 Feb 18.
2
Detecting Hijacked Journals by Using Classification Algorithms.利用分类算法检测劫持期刊。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):655-668. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9914-2. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
3
A Toolkit for Detecting Fallacious Calls for Papers from Potential Predatory Journals.识别潜在掠夺性期刊虚假征稿通知的工具包
Adv Pharm Bull. 2023 Nov;13(4):627-634. doi: 10.34172/apb.2023.068. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
4
Unveiling the Hidden Menace: A Topic Modeling Analysis of Hijacked Medical Journals.揭开隐藏的威胁:对被劫持医学期刊的主题建模分析
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024 Jul;14(2):255-261. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.029. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
5
Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.荟萃分析:俄罗斯出版物存在的问题。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.
6
Prevalence of plagiarism in hijacked journals: A text similarity analysis.被劫持期刊中的抄袭现象:文本相似度分析
Account Res. 2024 Aug 17:1-19. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2387210.
7
Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation.ChatGPT在期刊评估中的诊断不可靠性。
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024 Mar;14(1):1-4. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.020. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
8
Ranking Predatory Journals: Solve the Problem Instead of Removing It!对掠夺性期刊进行排名:解决问题而非消除问题!
Adv Pharm Bull. 2016 Mar;6(1):1-4. doi: 10.15171/apb.2016.001. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
10
Current and potential cyber attacks on medical journals; guidelines for improving security.医学期刊当前面临的及潜在的网络攻击;提高安全性的指南
Eur J Intern Med. 2017 Mar;38:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews.搜索研究:坎贝尔系统评价的信息检索指南
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 10;20(3):e1433. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1433. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation.ChatGPT在期刊评估中的诊断不可靠性。
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024 Mar;14(1):1-4. doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.020. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
3
Effect of an educational intervention on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers at King Hussein Cancer Center towards predatory publishers.教育干预对侯赛因国王癌症中心医护人员对掠夺性出版商的知识、态度和实践的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 22;23(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04312-2.
4
Academic E-Mail Overload and the Burden of "Academic Spam".学术电子邮件过载与“学术垃圾邮件”负担
Acad Pathol. 2020 Jan 21;7:2374289519898858. doi: 10.1177/2374289519898858. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases.读者请注意!掠夺性期刊正在渗透到引文数据库中。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Nov;64(8):1123-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01284-3. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Negative Effects of "Predatory" Journals on Global Health Research.掠夺性期刊对全球健康研究的负面影响。
Ann Glob Health. 2018 Nov 5;84(4):584-589. doi: 10.9204/aogh.2389.
7
Predatory publications in evidence syntheses.证据综合中的掠夺性出版物。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jan;107(1):57-61. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.491. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
8
Bibliometrics in a digital age: help or hindrance.数字时代的文献计量学:助力还是阻力。
Sci Prog. 2018 Sep 1;101(3):293-310. doi: 10.3184/003685018X15337564592469. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
9
Problems and challenges of predatory journals.掠夺性期刊的问题与挑战。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Sep;32(9):1441-1449. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15039. Epub 2018 May 29.
10
The disastrous boomerang effects of "citation mania".“引用狂热”带来的灾难性反效果。
J Cell Commun Signal. 2017 Sep;11(3):291-295. doi: 10.1007/s12079-017-0405-7. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Discriminating Between Legitimate and Predatory Open Access Journals: Report from the International Federation for Emergency Medicine Research Committee.区分合法与掠夺性开放获取期刊:国际急诊医学联合会研究委员会报告
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;17(5):497-507. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.7.30328. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
2
Dangerous Predatory Publishers Threaten Medical Research.危险的掠夺性出版商威胁医学研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1511-3. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1511.
3
Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing.被劫持的期刊:学术出版面临的新挑战
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jun;36(6):739-41. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw026. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
4
How to hijack a journal.如何操纵一本期刊。
Science. 2015 Nov 20;350(6263):903-5. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6263.903.
5
Predatory journals in psychiatry: A note of caution.精神病学领域的掠夺性期刊:一则警示
Asian J Psychiatr. 2015 Aug;16:67-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
The rise of predatory journals: what difference does it make?掠夺性期刊的兴起:这有何影响?
Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Nov;35(8):1042-3. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv085. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
7
Scientific publishing. Hoax-detecting software spots fake papers.
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):18-9. doi: 10.1126/science.348.6230.18.
8
Medical publishing triage - chronicling predatory open access publishers.医学出版分类——记录掠夺性开放获取出版商
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2013 Jun 22;2(2):47-9. doi: 10.1016/S2049-0801(13)70035-9. eCollection 2013.
9
Who's afraid of peer review?谁害怕同行评审?
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.
10
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.对发表在普通医学期刊上的文章在科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术中被引用情况的比较。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1092-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1307.