State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China; School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, PR China.
Sci Total Environ. 2017 May 15;586:696-729. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.047. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
After nearly twenty years of rapid modernization and urbanization in China, huge achievements have transformed the daily lives of the Chinese people. However, unprecedented environmental consequences in both indoor and outdoor environments have accompanied this progress and have triggered public awareness and demands for improved living standards, especially in residential environments. Indoor pollution data measured for >7000 dwellings (approximately 1/3 were newly decorated and were tested for volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements, while the rest were tested for particles, phthalates and other semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), moisture/mold, inorganic gases and radon) in China within the last ten years were reviewed, summarized and compared with indoor concentration recommendations based on sensory or health end-points. Ubiquitous pollutants that exceed the concentration recommendations, including particulate matter, formaldehyde, benzene and other VOCs, moisture/mold, inorganic gases and radon, were found, indicating a common indoor air quality (IAQ) issue in Chinese dwellings. With very little prevention, oral, inhalation and dermal exposure to those pollutants at unhealthy concentration levels is almost inevitable. CO, VOCs, humidity and radon can serve as ventilation determinants, each with different ventilation demands and strategies, at typical occupant densities in China; and particle reduction should be a prerequisite for determining ventilation requirements. Two directional ventilation modes would have profound impacts on improving IAQ for Chinese residences are: 1) natural (or window) ventilation with an air cleaner and 2) mechanical ventilation with an air filtration unit, these two modes were reviewed and compared for their applicability and advantages and disadvantages for reducing human exposure to indoor air pollutants. In general, mode 2 can more reliably ensure good IAQ for occupants; while mode 1 is more applicable due to its low cost and low energy consumption. However, besides a roadmap, substantial efforts are still needed to develop affordable, applicable and general ventilation solutions to improve the IAQ of residential buildings in China.
在中国近二十年的快速现代化和城市化进程中,巨大的成就改变了中国人的日常生活。然而,这种进步也带来了前所未有的室内外环境问题,引发了公众对改善生活水平的意识和需求,尤其是在居住环境方面。对过去十年间在中国进行的 >7000 个住宅室内污染数据(约 1/3 是新装修住宅,用于挥发性有机化合物(VOC)测量,其余的则用于测量颗粒物质、邻苯二甲酸酯和其他半挥发性有机化合物(SVOCs)、湿度/霉菌、无机气体和氡)进行了综述、总结,并与基于感官或健康终点的室内浓度建议进行了比较。无处不在的污染物,包括颗粒物、甲醛、苯和其他 VOCs、湿度/霉菌、无机气体和氡,其浓度都超过了建议值,这表明中国住宅存在普遍的室内空气质量(IAQ)问题。在没有采取任何预防措施的情况下,人们几乎不可避免地会以不健康的浓度水平通过口服、吸入和皮肤接触接触到这些污染物。在中国典型的居住密度下,CO、VOCs、湿度和氡可以作为通风的决定因素,每种因素都有不同的通风需求和策略;而降低颗粒物浓度应该是确定通风需求的前提。两种通风模式可能会对改善中国住宅的室内空气质量产生深远影响:1)带有空气净化器的自然(或窗户)通风;2)带有空气过滤单元的机械通风。对这两种模式的适用性及其优缺点进行了综述和比较,以减少人体对室内空气污染物的暴露。一般来说,模式 2 可以更可靠地为居住者保证良好的室内空气质量;而模式 1 由于成本低、能耗低,因此更适用。然而,除了制定路线图外,仍需要付出大量努力,开发经济实惠、适用和通用的通风解决方案,以改善中国住宅建筑的室内空气质量。