Conrad Heather J, Seong Wook-Jin, Pesun Igor J
Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 515 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Nov;98(5):389-404. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3.
Developments in ceramic core materials such as lithium disilicate, aluminum oxide, and zirconium oxide have allowed more widespread application of all-ceramic restorations over the past 10 years. With a plethora of ceramic materials and systems currently available for use, an overview of the scientific literature on the efficacy of this treatment therapy is indicated.
This article reviews the current literature covering all-ceramic materials and systems, with respect to survival, material properties, marginal and internal fit, cementation and bonding, and color and esthetics, and provides clinical recommendations for their use.
A comprehensive review of the literature was completed seeking evidence for the treatment of teeth with all-ceramic restorations. A search of English language peer-reviewed literature was undertaken using MEDLINE and PubMed with a focus on evidence-based research articles published between 1996 and 2006. A hand search of relevant dental journals was also completed. Randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled studies, longitudinal experimental clinical studies, longitudinal prospective studies, and longitudinal retrospective studies were reviewed. The last search was conducted on June 12, 2007. Data supporting the clinical application of all-ceramic materials and systems was sought.
The literature demonstrates that multiple all-ceramic materials and systems are currently available for clinical use, and there is not a single universal material or system for all clinical situations. The successful application is dependent upon the clinician to match the materials, manufacturing techniques, and cementation or bonding procedures, with the individual clinical situation.
Within the scope of this systematic review, there is no evidence to support the universal application of a single ceramic material and system for all clinical situations. Additional longitudinal clinical studies are required to advance the development of ceramic materials and systems.
在过去10年中,诸如二硅酸锂、氧化铝和氧化锆等陶瓷芯材的发展使得全瓷修复体得到了更广泛的应用。鉴于目前有大量的陶瓷材料和系统可供使用,有必要对关于这种治疗方法疗效的科学文献进行综述。
本文回顾了当前有关全瓷材料和系统的文献,涉及生存率、材料性能、边缘和内部适合性、粘结和粘接、颜色和美观性等方面,并为其临床应用提供建议。
完成了对文献的全面综述,以寻找全瓷修复体治疗牙齿的证据。使用MEDLINE和PubMed对英文同行评审文献进行了检索,重点是1996年至2006年发表的循证研究文章。还对手头检索相关牙科期刊。对随机对照试验、非随机对照研究、纵向实验临床研究、纵向前瞻性研究和纵向回顾性研究进行了综述。最后一次检索于2007年6月12日进行。寻找支持全瓷材料和系统临床应用的数据。
文献表明,目前有多种全瓷材料和系统可用于临床,不存在适用于所有临床情况的单一通用材料或系统。成功的应用取决于临床医生将材料、制造技术以及粘结或粘接程序与个体临床情况相匹配。
在本系统综述的范围内,没有证据支持单一陶瓷材料和系统在所有临床情况下的普遍应用。需要更多的纵向临床研究来推动陶瓷材料和系统的发展。