• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格特质通过习惯和意图在决定未来公共交通使用偏好方面的作用。

The Role of Personality Traits through Habit and Intention on Determining Future Preferences of Public Transport Use.

作者信息

Yazdanpanah Mahdi, Hadji Hosseinlou Mansour

机构信息

Transportation Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 1996715433, Iran.

Department of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran 1996715433, Iran.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Feb 17;7(1):8. doi: 10.3390/bs7010008.

DOI:10.3390/bs7010008
PMID:28218641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5371752/
Abstract

A complex set of factors may affect transportation mode choice. While earlier studies have often considered objective factors in determining preferences of public transport use as a sustainable transportation, subjective factors such as personality traits are underexplored. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the influence of personality traits on the number of future public transport use. Additionally, "car habit" and "intention toward using public modes" were considered to be important. For this purpose, a case study from departure passengers at Imam Khomeini International Airport (IKIA, Tehran, Iran) was conducted between January and February 2015 at IKIA. Results of structural equation modeling (SEM) shows that only neuroticism and extraversion personality traits were significant in determining future public transportation mode choice. However, the model indicates that these traits indirectly influence intention and car habit. Neuroticism was found to have a total effect of -0.022 on future public transport use, which represents a negative association with public transport use, while extraversion positively influenced future public transport use with a total effect of 0.031. Moreover, the results found interestingly that car access had a better fit to the data than the number of cars in household (NCH); both had significant positive effect on car habit, but only car access had a significant influence on intention. Furthermore, the effect of socio-demographic variables such as age, gender, educational level, income level, and body mass index (BMI) were determined to be significant in identifying choice of future transport mode to airports, which is explained in the discussion section of this paper.

摘要

一系列复杂的因素可能会影响交通方式的选择。虽然早期的研究通常在确定作为可持续交通方式的公共交通使用偏好时考虑客观因素,但诸如人格特质等主观因素却未得到充分探索。因此,本研究旨在调查人格特质对未来公共交通使用次数的影响。此外,“汽车使用习惯”和“使用公共交通方式的意愿”也被认为很重要。为此,2015年1月至2月在伊朗德黑兰伊玛目霍梅尼国际机场(IKIA)对出发乘客进行了一项案例研究。结构方程模型(SEM)的结果表明,只有神经质和外向型人格特质在决定未来公共交通方式选择方面具有显著性。然而,该模型表明这些特质会间接影响意愿和汽车使用习惯。研究发现,神经质对未来公共交通使用的总效应为-0.022,这表明与公共交通使用呈负相关,而外向性对未来公共交通使用有正向影响,总效应为0.031。此外,研究结果有趣地发现,汽车拥有情况比家庭汽车数量(NCH)更符合数据;两者对汽车使用习惯都有显著的正向影响,但只有汽车拥有情况对意愿有显著影响。此外,年龄、性别、教育水平、收入水平和体重指数(BMI)等社会人口统计学变量在确定前往机场的未来交通方式选择方面的影响被确定为显著,本文的讨论部分对此进行了解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/61576d3e0aee/behavsci-07-00008-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/aa58f778ebbc/behavsci-07-00008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/4c072c24a727/behavsci-07-00008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/61576d3e0aee/behavsci-07-00008-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/aa58f778ebbc/behavsci-07-00008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/4c072c24a727/behavsci-07-00008-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36ad/5371752/61576d3e0aee/behavsci-07-00008-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Role of Personality Traits through Habit and Intention on Determining Future Preferences of Public Transport Use.人格特质通过习惯和意图在决定未来公共交通使用偏好方面的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2017 Feb 17;7(1):8. doi: 10.3390/bs7010008.
2
Sociodemography, Geography, and Personality as Determinants of Car Driving and Use of Public Transportation.社会人口统计学、地理学和个性作为汽车驾驶和公共交通使用的决定因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 May 26;10(6):93. doi: 10.3390/bs10060093.
3
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
4
Integrating Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior to Understand Sustainable Transport Behavior: Evidence from China.整合规范激活模型和计划行为理论理解可持续交通行为:来自中国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 18;14(12):1593. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121593.
5
The Effect of Travel-Chain Complexity on Public Transport Travel Intention: A Mixed-Selection Model.出行链复杂性对公共交通出行意愿的影响:混合选择模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 3;20(5):4547. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054547.
6
Analysis of Sustainable Transport Systems in Service of Selected SEA-EU Consortium Countries' Airports-A Pilot Case Study of Passenger Choices for Gdańsk Airport.服务于选定的 SEA-EU 财团国家机场的可持续交通系统分析——以格但斯克机场的旅客选择为例的试点案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;19(2):827. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020827.
7
Impact of COVID-19: A radical modal shift from public to private transport mode.新冠疫情的影响:从公共交通模式到私人交通模式的根本性转变。
Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Aug;109:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 13.
8
The relationship between subjective well-being and individual characteristics, personality traits, and choice of transport mode during the first lock-down in Milan, Italy.意大利米兰首次封锁期间主观幸福感与个体特征、人格特质及交通方式选择之间的关系。
J Transp Health. 2023 May;30:101600. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2023.101600. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
9
Predicting the use of public transportation: a case study from Putrajaya, Malaysia.预测公共交通的使用情况:以马来西亚布城为例的研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:784145. doi: 10.1155/2014/784145. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
10
Trait positive and negative emotionality differentially associate with diurnal cortisol activity.特质积极情绪和消极情绪与昼夜皮质醇活动存在不同程度的关联。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jun;68:177-85. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring factors of e-waste recycling intention: The case of generation Y.探究电子废物回收意愿的影响因素:以 Y 世代为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0287435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287435. eCollection 2023.
2
Intention to use light-rail transit in Houston, Texas, United States: Findings from the Travel-Related Activity in Neighborhoods study.美国得克萨斯州休斯敦市使用轻轨交通的意向:邻里出行相关活动研究的结果
Int J Sustain Transp. 2020;14(12):944-955. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1663962. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
3
Sociodemography, Geography, and Personality as Determinants of Car Driving and Use of Public Transportation.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality traits across cultures.跨文化的人格特质
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.014. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
2
Differential impact of personality traits on distracted driving behaviors in teens and older adults.人格特质对青少年和老年人分心驾驶行为的不同影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
The impact of personality on driving safety among Chinese high-speed railway drivers.个性对中国高速铁路司机驾驶安全的影响。
社会人口统计学、地理学和个性作为汽车驾驶和公共交通使用的决定因素。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 May 26;10(6):93. doi: 10.3390/bs10060093.
4
Wayfinding Strategy and Gender - Testing the Mediating Effects of Wayfinding Experience, Personality and Emotions.寻路策略与性别——检验寻路体验、个性和情绪的中介作用
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020 Jan 31;13:119-131. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S236735. eCollection 2020.
5
Prediction of taxi drivers' safe-driving behaviors based on the theory of planned behavior: The role of habit.基于计划行为理论对出租车司机安全驾驶行为的预测:习惯的作用。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Nov 27;7:139. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_61_18. eCollection 2018.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
4
Active commuting and obesity in mid-life: cross-sectional, observational evidence from UK Biobank.积极通勤与中年肥胖:来自英国生物库的横断面观察性证据。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 May;4(5):420-35. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00053-X. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
5
Perceived health status associated with transport choice for short distance trips.与短途出行交通方式选择相关的感知健康状况。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Oct 9;2:839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.09.013. eCollection 2015.
6
Personality and cognitive profiles of a general synesthetic trait.一种普遍联觉特征的人格与认知概况。
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jul 29;88:35-48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
The tracking of active travel and its relationship with body composition in UK adolescents.英国青少年主动出行的追踪及其与身体成分的关系。
J Transp Health. 2015 Dec;2(4):483-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.09.005.
8
Travel Behavior Change in Older Travelers: Understanding Critical Reactions to Incidents Encountered in Public Transport.老年旅行者的出行行为变化:理解对公共交通中遇到事件的关键反应
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 18;12(11):14741-63. doi: 10.3390/ijerph121114741.
9
Conscientious personality and young drivers' crash risk.尽责性人格与年轻驾驶员的撞车风险。
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Transit Use, Physical Activity, and Body Mass Index Changes: Objective Measures Associated With Complete Street Light-Rail Construction.公交使用、身体活动及体重指数变化:与完备街道轻轨建设相关的客观指标
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105(7):1468-74. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302561. Epub 2015 May 14.