Endodontic Clinical Section, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), School of Dentistry, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Int Endod J. 2018 Apr;51 Suppl 3:e178-e188. doi: 10.1111/iej.12757. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
This retrospective study explored survival and periapical healing outcomes in teeth root filled with Thermafil obturators.
Root canals of 213 teeth (94 subjects, mean age 48 ± 13 years), instrumented with a step-down technique, irrigated with 5% NaOCl and 10% EDTA and filled with Thermafil and AH Plus sealer, were involved in a recall programme. Teeth were retrospectively re-examined after 5 ± 1 years in a controlled environment. Clinical and radiographic data that were collected included the following: preoperative Periapical Index (PAI) score and signs/symptoms, treatment type, root filling length and presence/absence of voids, restoration type, follow-up PAI score and signs/symptoms. Teeth were considered 'healthy' (PAI ≤ 2, no signs/symptoms) or 'diseased' (PAI ≥ 3, signs/symptoms present, retreated, extracted for endodontic reasons). Two PAI-calibrated examiners assessed outcomes blinded to preoperative status. Bivariate and multilevel analyses were performed at level of patient and tooth (α = 5%).
Of 213 teeth treated, 187 (88%) survived and 26 were extracted, six (3%) for persistent endodontic infection (considered 'diseased'), and 20 (9%) for root fracture, periodontal disease or coronal fracture (excluded from analysis). Whilst survival was significantly associated with tooth type (P = 0.015), type of treatment (P = 0.012) and pulpal/periapical diagnosis (P = 0.035), none of these variables were substantiated as survival predictors by the multilevel analysis. A total of 164 of 193 teeth (85%) were assessed as 'healthy', with significantly higher (chi-square; P < 0.04) 'healthy' rates for teeth with PAI score ≤2 and root fillings of adequate length. Multilevel analysis identified PAI score ≤2 (P = 0.002) as the only predictor of periapical health.
In this 5 ± 1 year retrospective assessment, survival and healing rates after root canal treatment with Thermafil root fillings were comparable to those previously reported for conventional root filling techniques.
本回顾性研究旨在探讨使用 Thermafil 根管充填系统治疗的患牙的存活率和根尖愈合情况。
本研究纳入了 213 颗牙齿(94 名患者,平均年龄 48±13 岁)的根管治疗病例,这些牙齿采用逐步后退技术进行根管预备,使用 5%次氯酸钠和 10% EDTA 进行冲洗,并使用 Thermafil 和 AH Plus 进行根管充填。所有患牙均纳入了一个召回计划,并在 5±1 年后于控制环境下进行了回顾性复查。收集的临床和放射学数据包括:术前根尖指数(PAI)评分和体征/症状、治疗类型、根管充填长度以及是否有空隙、修复类型、随访 PAI 评分和体征/症状。将牙齿分为“健康”(PAI≤2,无体征/症状)或“患病”(PAI≥3,有体征/症状,经治疗、再治疗或因根管原因而拔除)。两名经过 PAI 校准的检查者在不知道术前状态的情况下对结果进行了盲法评估。在患者和牙齿两个水平上进行了双变量和多水平分析(α=5%)。
在 213 颗接受治疗的牙齿中,187 颗(88%)存活,26 颗被拔除,其中 6 颗(3%)因持续性牙髓感染(被视为“患病”),20 颗(9%)因根折、牙周病或冠折而拔除(排除在分析之外)。虽然牙齿类型(P=0.015)、治疗类型(P=0.012)和牙髓/根尖病变诊断(P=0.035)与存活率显著相关,但多水平分析并未证实这些变量是存活率的预测因素。在 193 颗可评估的牙齿中,有 164 颗(85%)被评估为“健康”,其中 PAI 评分≤2 和根管充填长度充足的牙齿的“健康”率显著更高(卡方检验;P<0.04)。多水平分析确定 PAI 评分≤2(P=0.002)是根尖健康的唯一预测因素。
在这项 5±1 年的回顾性评估中,使用 Thermafil 根管充填系统进行根管治疗后的存活率和愈合率与传统根管充填技术的报告结果相当。