Dental Informatics, Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry & Dental Public Health, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.
J Dent Res. 2022 Oct;101(11):1328-1334. doi: 10.1177/00220345221093936. Epub 2022 May 12.
Few studies have examined the longevity of endodontically treated teeth in nonacademic clinical settings where most of the population receives its care. This study aimed to quantify the longevity of teeth treated endodontically in general dentistry practices and test the hypothesis that longevity significantly differed by the patient's age, gender, dental insurance, geographic region, and placement of a crown and/or other restoration soon after root canal treatment (RCT). This retrospective study used deidentified data of patients who underwent RCT of permanent teeth through October 2015 in 99 general dentistry practices in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (Network). The data set included 46,702 patients and 71,283 RCT permanent teeth. The Kaplan-Meier (product limit) estimator was performed to estimate survival rate after the first RCT performed on a specific tooth. The Cox proportional hazards model was done to account for patient- and tooth-specific covariates. The overall median survival time was 11.1 y; 26% of RCT teeth survived beyond 20 y. Tooth type, presence of dental insurance any time during dental care, placement of crown and/or receiving a filling soon after RCT, and Network region were significant predictors of survival time ( < 0.0001). Gender and age were not statistically significant predictors in univariable analysis, but in multivariable analyses, gender was significant after accounting for other variables. This study of Network practices geographically distributed across the United States observed shorter longevity of endodontically treated permanent teeth than in previous community-based studies. Also, having a crown placed following an RCT was associated with 5.3 y longer median survival time. Teeth that received a filling soon after the RCT before the crown was placed had a median survival time of 20.1 y compared to RCT teeth with only a crown (11.4 y), only a filling (11.2 y), or no filling and no crown (6.5 y).
很少有研究检查在大多数人接受治疗的非学术临床环境中接受根管治疗的牙齿的长期效果。本研究旨在量化普通牙科实践中根管治疗牙齿的长期效果,并检验以下假设:患者的年龄、性别、牙科保险、地理位置以及根管治疗(RCT)后不久放置牙冠和/或其他修复体的位置会显著影响长期效果。本回顾性研究使用了全国牙科实践为基础的研究网络(Network)中 99 家普通牙科诊所在 2015 年 10 月前接受 RCT 的恒牙患者的匿名数据。该数据集包括 46702 名患者和 71283 颗接受 RCT 的恒牙。采用 Kaplan-Meier(乘积限)估计器估计特定牙齿首次接受 RCT 后的生存率。使用 Cox 比例风险模型考虑患者和牙齿特定的协变量。总体中位生存时间为 11.1 年;26%的 RCT 牙存活时间超过 20 年。牙类型、任何时候都有牙科保险、RCT 后不久放置牙冠和/或接受填充、以及 Network 地区是生存时间的显著预测因素(<0.0001)。在单变量分析中,性别和年龄不是统计学上显著的预测因素,但在多变量分析中,在考虑其他变量后,性别是显著的。这项对美国各地网络实践的研究观察到,根管治疗的恒牙长期效果比以前的基于社区的研究短。此外,在 RCT 后放置牙冠与中位生存时间延长 5.3 年相关。在放置牙冠之前不久接受 RCT 后接受填充的牙齿的中位生存时间为 20.1 年,而仅接受牙冠(11.4 年)、仅接受填充(11.2 年)或既无填充又无牙冠(6.5 年)的 RCT 牙相比。