• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在提示-任务指令后的首次试验中,从任务冲突效应中自动检索新指示的提示-任务关联。

Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.

作者信息

Meiran Nachshon, Pereg Maayan

机构信息

1 Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2017 Jan;64(1):37-48. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000349.

DOI:10.1027/1618-3169/a000349
PMID:28219260
Abstract

Novel stimulus-response associations are retrieved automatically even without prior practice. Is this true for novel cue-task associations? The experiment involved miniblocks comprising three phases and task switching. In the INSTRUCTION phase, two new stimuli (or familiar cues) were arbitrarily assigned as cues for up-down/right-left tasks performed on placeholder locations. In the UNIVALENT phase, there was no task cue since placeholder's location afforded one task but the placeholders were the stimuli that we assigned as task cues for the following BIVALENT phase (involving target locations affording both tasks). Thus, participants held the novel cue-task associations in memory while executing the UNIVALENT phase. Results show poorer performance in the first univalent trial when the placeholder was associated with the opposite task (incompatible) than when it was compatible, an effect that was numerically larger with newly instructed cues than with familiar cues. These results indicate automatic retrieval of newly instructed cue-task associations.

摘要

即使没有事先练习,新的刺激-反应关联也会自动被检索出来。对于新的线索-任务关联来说也是如此吗?该实验包括由三个阶段和任务切换组成的微型组块。在指令阶段,两个新的刺激(或熟悉的线索)被任意指定为在占位符位置上执行上下/左右任务的线索。在单值阶段,由于占位符的位置只允许执行一个任务,所以没有任务线索,但占位符是我们为接下来的双值阶段(涉及两个任务都适用的目标位置)指定为任务线索的刺激。因此,参与者在执行单值阶段时将新的线索-任务关联保存在记忆中。结果表明,当占位符与相反任务(不兼容)相关联时,在第一个单值试验中的表现比与兼容任务相关联时更差,新指示线索的这种效应在数值上比熟悉线索的更大。这些结果表明新指示的线索-任务关联会自动被检索出来。

相似文献

1
Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.在提示-任务指令后的首次试验中,从任务冲突效应中自动检索新指示的提示-任务关联。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jan;64(1):37-48. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000349.
2
The influence of cue-task association and location on switch cost and alternating-switch cost.线索-任务关联和位置对切换成本及交替切换成本的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Mar;56(1):18-29. doi: 10.1037/h0087382.
3
Cue-task associations in task switching.任务切换中的线索-任务关联
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jun;60(6):762-9. doi: 10.1080/17470210701268005.
4
The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.在具有显著线索的非焦点和焦点前瞻性记忆任务中灵活运用监测过程。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Sep;179:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
5
The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.注意在前瞻记忆遗忘中的作用。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Jun;64(3):226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.09.007. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
6
Is performance in task-cuing experiments mediated by task set selection or associative compound retrieval?在任务提示实验中的表现是由任务集选择还是联想复合检索介导的?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1002-24. doi: 10.1037/a0035981. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
7
Task conflict effect in task switching.任务转换中的任务冲突效应。
Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
8
Learned interval time facilitates associate memory retrieval.习得的间隔时间有助于联想记忆检索。
Learn Mem. 2017 Mar 15;24(4):158-161. doi: 10.1101/lm.044404.116. Print 2017 Apr.
9
Intelligence as the efficiency of cue-driven retrieval from secondary memory.智力即线索驱动的二级记忆检索效率。
Memory. 2016;24(3):285-94. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.1002412. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
10
Cue familiarity is represented in monkey medial prefrontal cortex during visuomotor association learning.在视觉运动关联学习过程中,线索熟悉度在猴子内侧前额叶皮层中得到体现。
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Jan;168(1-2):281-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0285-6. Epub 2005 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
How can caching explain automaticity?缓存如何解释自动化?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Apr;30(2):407-420. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02191-0. Epub 2022 Oct 12.