• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务转换中的任务冲突效应。

Task conflict effect in task switching.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2
PMID:20309709
Abstract

A part of action preparation is deciding what the relevant task is. This task-decision process is conceptually separate from response selection. To show this, the authors manipulated task conflict in a spatial task-switching paradigm, using conflict stimuli that appeared during trials with univalent targets (affording 1 task). The conflict stimuli afforded task identity because they were used as task cues with bivalent targets (affording 2 tasks) that were intermixed with the univalent targets. Thus, for univalent targets, irrelevant stimuli either caused low task conflict or high task conflict. In three experiments, the authors found poorer performance in high task conflict trials than in low task conflict trials. Task conflict was introduced during target appearance (Experiment 1) or task preparation (Experiments 2 and 3). In the latter case, the task conflict effect decreased with increasing task preparation time showing that task preparation involves task decision.

摘要

动作准备的一部分是确定相关任务是什么。这个任务决策过程在概念上与反应选择是分开的。为了证明这一点,作者在空间任务转换范式中操纵了任务冲突,使用冲突刺激在具有单一价值目标的试验中出现(提供 1 项任务)。冲突刺激提供了任务身份,因为它们与具有双重价值目标的任务线索一起使用(提供 2 项任务),双重价值目标与单一价值目标混合出现。因此,对于单一价值目标,无关刺激要么导致低任务冲突,要么导致高任务冲突。在三个实验中,作者发现高任务冲突试验的表现比低任务冲突试验差。任务冲突在目标出现时(实验 1)或任务准备时(实验 2 和 3)引入。在后一种情况下,随着任务准备时间的增加,任务冲突效应减小,表明任务准备涉及任务决策。

相似文献

1
Task conflict effect in task switching.任务转换中的任务冲突效应。
Psychol Res. 2010 Nov;74(6):568-78. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0279-2. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task.一项与仅提供相关任务的刺激相关的任务转换的准备和执行的脑电位研究。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2012 May;33(5):1137-54. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21277. Epub 2011 May 31.
3
Task Switching Hurts Memory Encoding.任务切换会损害记忆编码。
Exp Psychol. 2019 Jan;66(1):58-67. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000431.
4
Automatic Retrieval of Newly Instructed Cue-Task Associations Seen in Task-Conflict Effects in the First Trial after Cue-Task Instructions.在提示-任务指令后的首次试验中,从任务冲突效应中自动检索新指示的提示-任务关联。
Exp Psychol. 2017 Jan;64(1):37-48. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000349.
5
"Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching.“智能抑制”:任务转换过程中冲突产生任务规则被抑制的电生理证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Sep;11(3):292-308. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y.
6
Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.将干扰项转变为目标会增强一致性序列效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jan;192:31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
7
Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.在任务切换的背景下,分离刺激集和反应集。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Jun;39(3):700-19. doi: 10.1037/a0029545. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
8
Conflict modification: predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task.冲突修正:可预测地产生一致情境有助于在斯特鲁普任务中做出反应。
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1021-8. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
9
Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of bivalent and univalent responses during task switching.任务切换过程中双价和单价反应的行为及神经生理学关联
Brain Res. 2007 Jul 9;1157:56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.046. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
10
Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions.任务冲突对交替运行和提示任务切换中任务切换成本和任务混合成本的差异贡献:来自反应时间分布的前高斯建模的证据。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):259-66. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1. Epub 2014 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.任务切换中基于刺激的任务冲突的局部和全局控制调整。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):963-977. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200442. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
2
Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.任务转换范式中扩散决策模型的老化效应。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Sep;35(6):850-865. doi: 10.1037/pag0000562. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
3
Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review.任务冲突与任务控制:一篇小型综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis.在斯特鲁普任务中区分反应冲突和任务冲突:来自高斯分布分析的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1398-412. doi: 10.1037/a0016467.
2
Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will.人类意志:迈向意志的神经科学
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):934-46. doi: 10.1038/nrn2497.
3
An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching.任务切换中认知控制的整合模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 17;10:1598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01598. eCollection 2019.
4
Consistent Performance Differences between Children and Adults Despite Manipulation of Cue-Target Variables.尽管对线索-目标变量进行了操纵,但儿童与成人之间仍存在持续的表现差异。
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 3;8:1304. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01304. eCollection 2017.
5
A role for proactive control in rapid instructed task learning.主动控制在快速指令性任务学习中的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Mar;184:20-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
6
Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.线索反应分离抑制过程:任务同一性信息与逆向抑制有关,但与竞争规则抑制无关。
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):168-181. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0742-1. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
7
Task uncertainty can account for mixing and switch costs in task-switching.任务不确定性可以解释任务转换中的混合成本和切换成本。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0131556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131556. eCollection 2015.
8
Parallel temporal dynamics in hierarchical cognitive control.分层认知控制中的并行时间动态
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:205-29. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
9
Differential contribution of task conflicts to task switch cost and task mixing cost in alternating runs and cued task-switching: evidence from ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction time distributions.任务冲突对交替运行和提示任务切换中任务切换成本和任务混合成本的差异贡献:来自反应时间分布的前高斯建模的证据。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):259-66. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0569-1. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
10
Conflict control in task conflict and response conflict.任务冲突和反应冲突中的冲突控制。
Psychol Res. 2015 Mar;79(2):238-48. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0565-5. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jul;115(3):602-39. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602.
4
The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation.双重可供性的双重含义:任务准备期间的刺激-任务绑定与注意力焦点变化。
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(4):251-9. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.251.
5
Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching.通过动作表征和输入选择进行控制(CARIS):任务切换的理论框架。
Psychol Res. 2008 Sep;72(5):473-500. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0136-8. Epub 2008 Mar 19.
6
The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory.任务转换中的任务规则一致性效应反映了激活的长期记忆。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Feb;34(1):137-57. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.137.
7
Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect.斯特鲁普效应中任务冲突的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1170-6. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1170.
8
Cue-task associations in task switching.任务切换中的线索-任务关联
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2007 Jun;60(6):762-9. doi: 10.1080/17470210701268005.
9
Exogenous influences on task set activation in task switching.任务切换中任务集激活的外部影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jun;59(6):1033-46. doi: 10.1080/02724980543000105.
10
Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm.提前任务准备可降低线索提示任务切换范式中的任务错误率。
Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1272-88. doi: 10.3758/bf03193228.