Wang Xiao, Knight Louise S, Evans Anne, Wang Jiangxia, Smith Thomas J
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore; and Gilchrist Services, Hunt Valley, MD.
J Oncol Pract. 2017 May;13(5):e496-e504. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.018093. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
The benefits of hospice for patients with end-stage disease are well established. Although hospice use is increasing, a growing number of patients are enrolled for ≤ 7 days, a marker of poor quality of care and patient and family dissatisfaction. In this study, we examined variations in referrals among individuals and groups of physicians to assess a potential source of suboptimal hospice use.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of 452 patients with advanced cancer referred to hospice from a comprehensive cancer center. We analyzed patient length of service (LOS) under hospice care, looking specifically at median LOS and percent of short enrollments (%LOS ≤ 7), to examine the variation between individual oncologists and divisions of oncologists.
Of 394 successfully referred patients, median LOS was 14.5 days and %LOS ≤ 7 was 32.5%, consistent with national data. There was significant interdivisional variation in LOS, both by overall distribution and %LOS ≤ 7 ( P < .01). In addition, there was dramatic variation in median LOS by individual physician (range, 4 to 88 days for physicians with five or more patients), indicating differences in hospice referral practices between providers (coefficient of variation > 125%). As one example, median LOS of physicians in the Division of Thoracic Malignancies varied from 4 to 33 days, despite similarities in patient population.
Nearly one in three patients with cancer who used hospice had LOS ≤ 7 days, a marker of poor quality. There was significant LOS variability among different divisions and different individual physicians, suggesting a need for increased education and training to meet recommended guidelines.
临终关怀对终末期疾病患者的益处已得到充分证实。尽管临终关怀的使用在增加,但越来越多的患者登记入住时间≤7天,这是护理质量差以及患者和家属不满的一个标志。在本研究中,我们检查了个体医生和医生群体之间转诊的差异,以评估临终关怀使用欠佳的一个潜在原因。
我们对一家综合癌症中心转诊至临终关怀机构的452例晚期癌症患者进行了回顾性病历审查。我们分析了患者在临终关怀护理下的服务时长(LOS),特别关注中位LOS和短期入住率(%LOS≤7),以检查个体肿瘤学家和肿瘤学家科室之间的差异。
在394例成功转诊的患者中,中位LOS为14.5天,%LOS≤7为32.5%,与全国数据一致。LOS在科室之间存在显著差异,无论是总体分布还是%LOS≤7(P<.01)。此外,个体医生的中位LOS存在显著差异(对于有5名或更多患者的医生,范围为4至88天),表明提供者之间临终关怀转诊实践存在差异(变异系数>125%)。例如,胸科恶性肿瘤科室医生的中位LOS从4天到33天不等,尽管患者群体相似。
近三分之一使用临终关怀的癌症患者LOS≤7天,这是质量差的一个标志。不同科室和不同个体医生之间的LOS存在显著差异,表明需要加强教育和培训以符合推荐指南。