• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Social Determinants of Comfort: A New Way of Conceptualizing Pediatric End-of-Life Care.舒适的社会决定因素:一种儿科临终关怀概念化的新方法。
J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Sep 9. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000902.
2
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
3
Dying, dependency and death: Exploring palliative care access gaps for children.濒死、依赖与死亡:探寻儿童姑息治疗的获取差距
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Mar 1;9:120. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.20803.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Pediatric Palliative Care.儿科姑息治疗
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(sup1):422-430. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1964867. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
Equity First: Conceptualizing a Normative Framework to Assess the Role of Preemption in Public Health.公平优先:概念化一个规范性框架,以评估预先防范在公共卫生中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar;98(1):131-149. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12444. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
7
Broadening End-of-Life Comfort to Improve Palliative Care Practices in Long Term Care.拓展临终关怀以改善长期护理中的姑息治疗实践。
Can J Aging. 2017 Sep;36(3):306-317. doi: 10.1017/S0714980817000253. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Dying at home for people experiencing financial hardship and deprivation: How health and social care professionals recognise and reflect on patients' circumstances.对于面临经济困难和贫困的人来说,在家中离世:健康与社会护理专业人员如何识别并思考患者的情况。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2023 Mar 31;17:26323524231164162. doi: 10.1177/26323524231164162. eCollection 2023.
9
Self-Perceived Knowledge and Comfort Discussing Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues among Professionals Managing Neuroinflammatory Diseases.管理神经炎症性疾病的专业人员对姑息治疗和生命末期问题的自我感知知识和舒适度的探讨。
J Palliat Med. 2021 May;24(5):725-735. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0268. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
10
Goals of care in advanced dementia: quality of life, dignity and comfort.晚期痴呆症的护理目标:生活质量、尊严与舒适。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2007 Nov-Dec;11(6):481.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining Rurality in Hospice Research: Evaluation of Common Measures.界定临终关怀研究中的农村性:常用指标评估。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(4):2167-2180. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0189.
2
Social Determinants of Comfort: A New Term for End-of-Life Care.舒适的社会决定因素:临终关怀的一个新术语。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;24(8):1130-1131. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0209.
3
Mental health and developmental disabilities in US children admitted in hospice care.美国儿童在临终关怀机构接受治疗时的心理健康和发育障碍。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2021 May 2;27(3):124-130. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2021.27.3.124.
4
Medical complexity and concurrent hospice care: A national study of Medicaid children from 2011 to 2013.医疗复杂性与同期临终关怀:2011 至 2013 年 Medicaid 儿童的全国性研究。
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2021 Oct;26(4):e12333. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12333. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
5
Barriers to Optimal End-of-Life Care for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Bereaved Caregiver Perspectives.癌症青少年和年轻患者临终关怀的障碍:丧亲照料者的观点。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Feb 11;19(5):528-533. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7645. Print 2021 May.
6
Dying Poor in the US-Disparities in End-of-Life Care.美国贫困者临终时的情况——临终关怀中的差异
JAMA. 2021 Feb 2;325(5):423-424. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26162.
7
Variation In State Medicaid Implementation Of The ACA: The Case Of Concurrent Care For Children.《平价医疗法案》在各州医疗补助计划实施中的差异:儿童同步护理案例
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Oct;39(10):1770-1775. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01192.
8
End-of-life care for homeless people in shelter-based nursing care settings: A retrospective record study.庇护式护理环境中无家可归者的临终关怀:一项回顾性记录研究。
Palliat Med. 2020 Dec;34(10):1374-1384. doi: 10.1177/0269216320940559. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
9
Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients With Cancer.癌症患者姑息治疗的提供模式。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 20;38(9):852-865. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02123. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
10
An ecological framework for improving child and adolescent health.改善儿童和青少年健康的生态框架。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Mar;105(3):299-301. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317518. Epub 2019 Nov 7.

舒适的社会决定因素:一种儿科临终关怀概念化的新方法。

Social Determinants of Comfort: A New Way of Conceptualizing Pediatric End-of-Life Care.

作者信息

Mooney-Doyle Kim, Mendola Annette, Naumann Wendy C, Svynarenko Radion, Lindley Lisa C

出版信息

J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2022 Sep 9. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000902.

DOI:10.1097/NJH.0000000000000902
PMID:36083230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9995599/
Abstract

The social determinants of comfort describe structural conditions that influence whether, to what degree, and in what forms comfort measures are offered to and accepted by people living with serious illness and their families. The notion of social determinants of comfort builds on the well-accepted concept of social determinants of health. Although some guiding palliative care documents begin to address this intersection, deeper understanding and exploration are needed. The goals of this article are to (1) describe and articulate the impact of structural and ecological factors on the comfort children and families can attain near the end of life; (2) describe how to address these factors to support children and families in attaining comfort, and maybe even flourish, at end of life; and (3) provide an agenda for research that addresses how palliative care research can advance health equity and how a focus on equity can advance palliative care science. A variety of inequities reinforce social vulnerability and disadvantage throughout the life span and can have profound effects on children, particularly children with serious illness or at the end of life. Ethical care for these children requires recognition of the social determinants of comfort.

摘要

舒适的社会决定因素描述了一些结构性条件,这些条件会影响针对重症患者及其家人提供舒适措施的方式、程度以及形式,以及他们是否接受这些措施。舒适的社会决定因素这一概念建立在已被广泛认可的健康的社会决定因素概念之上。尽管一些指导性的姑息治疗文件开始涉及这一交叉领域,但仍需要更深入的理解和探索。本文的目标是:(1)描述并阐明结构和生态因素对儿童及其家人在生命末期所能获得的舒适程度的影响;(2)描述如何应对这些因素,以支持儿童及其家人在生命末期获得舒适,甚至实现蓬勃发展;(3)提供一个研究议程,探讨姑息治疗研究如何促进健康公平,以及关注公平如何推动姑息治疗科学发展。在整个生命过程中,各种不平等加剧了社会脆弱性和劣势,对儿童,尤其是重症儿童或生命末期的儿童可能产生深远影响。对这些儿童进行符合伦理的照护需要认识到舒适的社会决定因素。