Kannisto Kati Anneli, Korhonen Joonas, Adams Clive E, Koivunen Marita Hannele, Vahlberg Tero, Välimäki Maritta Anneli
Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 21;19(2):e46. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6417.
Clinical trials are the gold standard of evidence-based practice. Still many papers inadequately report methodology in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), particularly for mHealth interventions for people with serious mental health problems. To ensure robust enough evidence, it is important to understand which study phases are the most vulnerable in the field of mental health care.
We mapped the recruitment and the trial follow-up periods of participants to provide a picture of the dropout predictors from a mHealth-based trial. As an example, we used a mHealth-based multicenter RCT, titled "Mobile.Net," targeted at people with serious mental health problems.
Recruitment and follow-up processes of the Mobile.Net trial were monitored and analyzed. Recruitment outcomes were recorded as screened, eligible, consent not asked, refused, and enrolled. Patient engagement was recorded as follow-up outcomes: (1) attrition during short message service (SMS) text message intervention and (2) attrition during the 12-month follow-up period. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify which demographic factors were related to recruitment and retention.
We recruited 1139 patients during a 15-month period. Of 11,530 people screened, 36.31% (n=4186) were eligible. This eligible group tended to be significantly younger (mean 39.2, SD 13.2 years, P<.001) and more often women (2103/4181, 50.30%) than those who were not eligible (age: mean 43.7, SD 14.6 years; women: 3633/6514, 55.78%). At the point when potential participants were asked to give consent, a further 2278 refused. Those who refused were a little older (mean 40.2, SD 13.9 years) than those who agreed to participate (mean 38.3, SD 12.5 years; t1842=3.2, P<.001). We measured the outcomes after 12 months of the SMS text message intervention. Attrition from the SMS text message intervention was 4.8% (27/563). The patient dropout rate after 12 months was 0.36% (4/1123), as discovered from the register data. In all, 3.12% (35/1123) of the participants withdrew from the trial. However, dropout rates from the patient survey (either by paper or telephone interview) were 52.45% (589/1123) and 27.8% (155/558), respectively. Almost all participants (536/563, 95.2%) tolerated the intervention, but those who discontinued were more often women (21/27, 78%; P=.009). Finally, participants' age (P<.001), gender (P<.001), vocational education (P=.04), and employment status (P<.001) seemed to predict their risk of dropping out from the postal survey.
Patient recruitment and engagement in the 12-month follow-up conducted with a postal survey were the most vulnerable phases in the SMS text message-based trial. People with serious mental health problems may need extra support during the recruitment process and in engaging them in SMS text message-based trials to ensure robust enough evidence for mental health care.
International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 27704027; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN27704027 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6oHcU2SFp).
临床试验是循证医学实践的金标准。然而,仍有许多论文对随机对照试验(RCT)的方法学报告不充分,尤其是针对有严重心理健康问题人群的移动健康干预研究。为确保有足够有力的证据,了解精神卫生保健领域中哪些研究阶段最易出现问题很重要。
我们梳理了参与者的招募和试验随访期,以呈现基于移动健康的试验中退出预测因素的情况。作为示例,我们使用了一项针对有严重心理健康问题人群的基于移动健康的多中心RCT,名为“移动网络(Mobile.Net)”。
对“移动网络”试验的招募和随访过程进行监测与分析。招募结果记录为筛查、符合条件、未询问同意、拒绝和入组。患者参与情况记录为随访结果:(1)短信干预期间的损耗;(2)12个月随访期内的损耗。采用多元回归分析确定哪些人口统计学因素与招募和留存相关。
在15个月期间,我们招募了1139名患者。在11530名接受筛查的人中,36.31%(n = 4186)符合条件。与不符合条件者相比(年龄:平均43.7岁,标准差14.6岁;女性:3633/6514,55.78%),该符合条件组往往显著更年轻(平均39.2岁,标准差13.2岁),且女性比例更高(2103/4181,50.30%)。在要求潜在参与者给予同意时,另有2278人拒绝。拒绝者比同意参与者稍年长(平均40.2岁,标准差13.9岁,而同意参与者平均38.3岁,标准差12.5岁;t1842 = 3.2,P <.001)。我们在短信干预12个月后测量了结果。短信干预期间的损耗率为4.8%(27/563)。根据登记数据,12个月后的患者退出率为0.36%(4/1123)。总体而言,3.12%(35/1,123)的参与者退出了试验。然而,患者调查(通过纸质或电话访谈)的退出率分别为52.45%(589/1123)和27.8%(155/558)。几乎所有参与者(536/563,95.2%)耐受了干预,但中断干预的参与者中女性更常见(21/27,78%;P = 0.009)。最后,参与者的年龄(P <.001)、性别(P <.001)、职业教育(P = 0.04)和就业状况(P <.001)似乎可预测他们在邮政调查中的退出风险。
在基于短信的试验中,患者招募以及通过邮政调查进行的12个月随访中的参与情况是最易出现问题的阶段。有严重心理健康问题的人群在招募过程中以及参与基于短信的试验时可能需要额外支持,以确保有足够有力的精神卫生保健证据。
国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN):27704027;http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN27704027(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6oHcU2SFp)