• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

袖状胃切除术与胃旁路手术的安全性和有效性:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的一年结果

Safety and effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: one-year results of Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).

作者信息

Barzin Maryam, Khalaj Alireza, Motamedi Mohammad Ali, Shapoori Pravin, Azizi Fereidoun, Hosseinpanah Farhad

机构信息

Obesity Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Dec;9(Suppl1):S62-S69.

PMID:28224030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5310802/
Abstract

AIM

We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass at one-year.

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the two most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide.

METHODS

Patients from a prospectively collected database who presented to a specialized bariatric center and underwent a primary bariatric procedure between March 2013 and April 2015 were included and compared regarding major and minor complication rates and weight loss parameters at 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 513 patients with a mean age of 37.5±12.5, 82.6 % female and mean body mass index (BMI) of 44.1±6.3 kg/m2 were included in our analysis: 73.3% underwent SG and 26.7% underwent RYGB. Major and minor complication rates were 7.1 and 2.6% for SG vs. 9.5 and 2.2% for the RYGB, respectively (=NS). The operative and anesthesia time in SG patients were significantly shorter than in RYGB patients (P<0.001). SG and RYBG patients achieved similar excess weight loss at one year (75.4±20.5% vs. 71.8±26.3%, respectively, =NS). Baseline BMI was the only predictive factor for weight loss at one year (OR: 0.901, CI: 0.827-0.982, <0.017).

CONCLUSION

RYGB and SG both showed similar one-year safety and effectiveness. Long-term studies are needed to complement these findings.

摘要

目的

我们旨在比较袖状胃切除术与胃旁路术在一年时的有效性和安全性。

背景

Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)是全球最常开展的两种减肥手术。

方法

纳入前瞻性收集数据库中2013年3月至2015年4月期间就诊于一家专业减肥中心并接受初次减肥手术的患者,比较6个月和12个月时的主要和次要并发症发生率及体重减轻参数。

结果

我们的分析共纳入513例患者,平均年龄37.5±12.5岁,女性占82.6%,平均体重指数(BMI)为44.1±6.3kg/m²:73.3%接受了SG,26.7%接受了RYGB。SG的主要和次要并发症发生率分别为7.1%和2.6%,而RYGB分别为9.5%和2.2%(=无统计学差异)。SG患者的手术和麻醉时间显著短于RYGB患者(P<0.001)。SG和RYBG患者在一年时实现了相似的超重减轻(分别为75.4±20.5%和71.8±26.3%,=无统计学差异)。基线BMI是一年时体重减轻的唯一预测因素(比值比:0.901,可信区间:0.827 - 0.982,<0.017)。

结论

RYGB和SG均显示出相似的一年安全性和有效性。需要长期研究来补充这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e4/5310802/d0e2c8294d4a/GHFBB-S62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e4/5310802/3181b760572a/GHFBB-S62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e4/5310802/d0e2c8294d4a/GHFBB-S62-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e4/5310802/3181b760572a/GHFBB-S62-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77e4/5310802/d0e2c8294d4a/GHFBB-S62-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: one-year results of Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS).袖状胃切除术与胃旁路手术的安全性和有效性:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的一年结果
Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2016 Dec;9(Suppl1):S62-S69.
2
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.三种减肥手术方法的比较效果:Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.基于代谢与减重外科认证和质量改进计划数据库的袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术 30 天结果:首次报告。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
4
Ten-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: an observational nonrandomized cohort study.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术 10 年后的结果:一项观察性非随机队列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Mar;15(3):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients (BMI ≥60 kg/m): 6-year follow-up at a single university.超级肥胖患者(BMI≥60kg/m²)行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的疗效比较:单所大学的 6 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jan;15(1):23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.09.487. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
6
Loop Duodenojejunal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy: Comparative Study with Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Type 2 Diabetic Patients with a BMI <35 kg/m(2), First Year Results.十二指肠空肠袢式旁路术联合袖状胃切除术:与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗BMI<35kg/m²的2型糖尿病患者的对比研究,第一年结果
Obes Surg. 2016 Oct;26(10):2291-301. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2118-z.
7
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
8
Laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure: our algorithm.因减重失败将腹腔镜袖状胃切除术转换为十二指肠转位的胆胰分流术或 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:我们的算法
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
9
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
Comparative effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in super obese patients.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗超级肥胖患者的比较疗效
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):317-323. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4974-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Helicobacter pylori on sleeve gastrectomy and gastric microbiome differences in patients with obesity and diabetes.肥胖合并糖尿病患者中幽门螺杆菌对袖状胃切除术及胃微生物组差异的影响。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Nov;48(11):1664-1672. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01611-6. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Comparative Analysis of Hemostasis and Staple-Line Integrity between Medtronic Tri-Staple with Preloaded Buttress Material and the AEON Stapler in Bariatric Surgery.减重手术中使用带预装加强板的美敦力三钉与 AEON 吻合器的止血和吻合口完整性的对比分析。
JSLS. 2024 Apr-Jun;28(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2023.00058.
3
The Effect of Bariatric Surgery on Menstrual Abnormalities in Saudi Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Bariatric Surgery for Morbid Obesity: Tehran Obesity Treatment Study (TOTS) Rationale and Study Design.重度肥胖的减肥手术:德黑兰肥胖治疗研究(TOTS)的基本原理和研究设计。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Jan 20;5(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5214.
2
Psychological and Personality Predictors of Weight Loss and Comorbid Metabolic Changes After Bariatric Surgery.减肥手术后体重减轻及合并代谢变化的心理和人格预测因素
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 Nov;23(6):509-16. doi: 10.1002/erv.2404. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
3
Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery.
减肥手术对沙特女性月经异常的影响:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54964. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54964. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Impacts of Bariatric Surgery on Improvement of Incontinence Among Obese Asian Women: A Prospective Study and Literature Review.减重手术对改善亚洲肥胖女性尿失禁的影响:一项前瞻性研究和文献回顾。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1425-1431. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07172-x. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
5
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of Weight Loss Using a Multilevel Mixed-Effects Linear Model.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:使用多级混合效应线性模型对体重减轻情况的分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 8;12(6):2132. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062132.
6
Residual Gastric Dilatation Interferes with Metabolic Improvements Following Sleeve Gastrectomy by Upregulating the Expression of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-1.残胃扩张通过上调钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-1 的表达干扰袖状胃切除术后的代谢改善。
Obes Surg. 2019 Oct;29(10):3324-3333. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03997-z.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study.减重手术的疗效和安全性比较:PCORnet 队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):741-750. doi: 10.7326/M17-2786. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
代谢与减重手术中的标准化结局报告
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):489-506. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.003.
4
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy leads the U.S. utilization of bariatric surgery at academic medical centers.在学术医疗中心,腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在美国减肥手术的应用中占主导地位。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):987-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.02.008. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Use and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons NSQIP.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜胃旁路术的应用及结果:美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 May;220(5):880-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.059. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
6
Comparison of results after one year between sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².体重指数(BMI)≥50kg/m²的患者中,袖状胃切除术与胃旁路手术一年后结果的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jul-Aug;11(4):785-90. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.11.022. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
7
Effectiveness and Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass, and Adjustable Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Patients: a Multicenter, Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study.袖状胃切除术、胃旁路手术和可调节胃束带术在病态肥胖患者中的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、回顾性、匹配队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2015 Jul;25(7):1110-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1503-8.
8
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
9
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: a meta-analysis of 21 studies.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖及相关合并症:21项研究的荟萃分析
Obes Surg. 2015 Jan;25(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1385-9.
10
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a single center experience with 2 years follow-up.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:一项单中心2年随访经验
Obes Surg. 2015 Feb;25(2):254-62. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1388-6.