Rowan Matthew P, Niece Krista L, Rizzo Julie A, Akers Kevin S
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research , JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Texas.; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Feb 1;6(2):55-62. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0698.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) uses subatmospheric pressure as a noninvasive adjunct to treat wounds and has demonstrated clinical efficacy by accelerating healing of a variety of acute and chronic wounds. NPWT may also play a role in preventing or treating wound infections, possibly by increasing wound penetration of antibiotics. However, clinical data in patients undergoing antibiotic and NPWT treatment are limited. To evaluate the wound penetration of antibiotics in NPWT patients, we conducted a prospective, observational study of burn and trauma patients treated with NPWT and systemic antibiotics. We evaluated the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of systemic vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, cefazolin, and piperacillin/tazobactam, as well as total and unbound antibiotic concentrations in wound exudate from the same patients. Data from 32 patients with 37 wounds undergoing NPWT demonstrated that vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam all penetrated wounds with exudate to plasma concentration ratios more than 0.8. Cefazolin did not penetrate wounds in patients undergoing NPWT as effectively, with an average exudate to plasma concentration ratio of 0.51. Clinical data on the wound penetration of antibiotics in patients undergoing NPWT are limited, but these data suggest that antibiotics have different capacities for wound penetration during NPWT that should be considered when making clinical decisions. This initial report suggests that (1) vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin/tazobactam effectively penetrate wounds during NPWT and (2) cefazolin as well as other antibiotics may not penetrate wounds during NPWT.
负压伤口治疗(NPWT)利用低于大气压作为一种非侵入性辅助手段来治疗伤口,并已通过加速各种急性和慢性伤口的愈合证明了其临床疗效。NPWT还可能在预防或治疗伤口感染中发挥作用,可能是通过增加抗生素在伤口中的渗透。然而,接受抗生素和NPWT治疗的患者的临床数据有限。为了评估NPWT患者中抗生素的伤口渗透情况,我们对接受NPWT和全身抗生素治疗的烧伤和创伤患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。我们评估了全身万古霉素、环丙沙星、头孢唑林和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的血浆药代动力学特征,以及同一患者伤口渗出液中的总抗生素浓度和未结合抗生素浓度。来自32例接受NPWT治疗的37处伤口患者的数据表明,万古霉素、环丙沙星和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦均能渗透到伤口中,渗出液与血浆浓度比均超过0.8。头孢唑林在接受NPWT治疗的患者中对伤口的渗透效果不佳,平均渗出液与血浆浓度比为0.51。关于NPWT患者抗生素伤口渗透的临床数据有限,但这些数据表明,在NPWT期间抗生素的伤口渗透能力不同,在做出临床决策时应予以考虑。这份初步报告表明:(1)在NPWT期间,万古霉素、环丙沙星和哌拉西林/他唑巴坦能有效渗透到伤口中;(2)头孢唑林以及其他抗生素在NPWT期间可能无法渗透到伤口中。