• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋臼翻修术中伴大量骨量缺损时采用打压植骨技术的临床及影像学结果:4至7年随访研究

Clinical and radiological results of impaction bone allograft technique in acetabular revisions associated with massive bone stock deficiencies: Four to seven years follow-up study.

作者信息

El-Kawy S, Hay D, Drabu K

机构信息

Joint Replacement Research Unit, East Surrey Hospital Redhill, Surrey - UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2005 Jan-Mar;15(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/112070000501500107.

DOI:10.1177/112070000501500107
PMID:28224582
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate the medium- term results of impaction bone allograft technique when used on its own with cemented cups in acetabular revisions associated with massive bone loss.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study involved 28 hips in 27 patients classified as severe acetabular deficiencies (Paprosky type 3) secondary to aseptic loosening. All were revised with impacted morsellised bone allograft using fresh-frozen and freeze-dried bone together with cemented rim bearing UHMWP (28 mm I.D.) cups and followed for an average of 72 months (range 48 to 91 m). Clinical assessment was based on the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Radiological assessment included measurement of cup migration using image analysis computer software as well as assessment of graft incorporation.

RESULTS

Clinically, HHS improved from pre-operative average of 24.9 to average of 78 at the last follow-up. One hip was revised at 12 months postoperatively due to aseptic loosening. Survivorship for the cup with endpoint revision for any reason was 96.4%. Radio-logically, the average of superior migration was 1.53 mm; average of medial migration was 0.59 mm. 92.8% of hips showed radiographic evidence of graft incorporation. Cup survival rate with aseptic loosening as endpoint was 92.85%.

CONCLUSION

The technique of impaction bone grafting using morsellised fresh frozen bone allograft appears to be a valuable biological option in such patients, with encouraging results, but further follow-up is required to establish the longer term outcome of these reconstructions. (Hip International 2005; 15: 46-51).

摘要

引言

我们开展这项回顾性研究,以评估在伴有大量骨质流失的髋臼翻修术中,单纯使用打压植骨技术并结合骨水泥杯的中期结果。

患者与方法

本研究纳入了27例患者的28个髋关节,这些患者被归类为继发于无菌性松动的严重髋臼缺损(Paprosky 3型)。所有患者均采用新鲜冷冻骨和冻干骨混合的颗粒状异体骨打压植骨,并使用带骨水泥边缘的超高分子量聚乙烯(内径28 mm)杯进行翻修,平均随访72个月(范围48至91个月)。临床评估基于Harris髋关节评分(HHS)。影像学评估包括使用图像分析计算机软件测量髋臼杯移位,以及评估植骨融合情况。

结果

临床方面,HHS从术前平均24.9分提高到最后一次随访时的平均78分。1例髋关节在术后12个月因无菌性松动进行了翻修。因任何原因进行翻修作为终点的髋臼杯生存率为96.4%。影像学方面,上移平均为1.53 mm;内移平均为0.59 mm。92.8%的髋关节有影像学证据显示植骨融合。以无菌性松动为终点的髋臼杯生存率为92.85%。

结论

对于此类患者,使用颗粒状新鲜冷冻异体骨进行打压植骨技术似乎是一种有价值的生物学选择,结果令人鼓舞,但需要进一步随访以确定这些重建的长期结果。(《国际髋关节杂志》2005年;15:46 - 51)

相似文献

1
Clinical and radiological results of impaction bone allograft technique in acetabular revisions associated with massive bone stock deficiencies: Four to seven years follow-up study.髋臼翻修术中伴大量骨量缺损时采用打压植骨技术的临床及影像学结果:4至7年随访研究
Hip Int. 2005 Jan-Mar;15(1):46-51. doi: 10.1177/112070000501500107.
2
[Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].[采用非骨水泥髋臼杯及打压植骨异体碎骨块进行全髋关节置换术中无菌性松动的髋臼翻修术]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
3
Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.平均随访20年时,髋关节发育不良患者初次髋关节置换术的满意结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Nov;474(11):2462-2468. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4998-6. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
4
Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.50岁以下患者采用打压植骨和骨水泥杯进行髋臼重建。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Nov;86(11):2385-92. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00004.
5
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.使用带网塞骨移植术进行全髋关节翻修术对髋臼内侧缺损有效,但对髋臼外侧缺损效果不佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7.
6
[Acetabular revision with impacted irradiated frozen allografts].[采用嵌压式辐照冷冻同种异体骨进行髋臼翻修术]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Jul 15;48(14):1045-9.
7
[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].髋臼组件打压植骨治疗严重髋臼缺损的短期和中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 15;34(3):341-346. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201904153.
8
Acetabular revision with impacted morselized cancellous bone graft and a cemented cup in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: three to fourteen-year follow-up.类风湿性关节炎患者使用嵌压颗粒状松质骨移植和骨水泥型髋臼杯进行髋臼翻修:3至14年随访
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Apr;85(4):647-52. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200304000-00010.
9
Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery.髋关节翻修术中的嵌压植骨。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Mar;103-B(3):492-499. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-1228.R1.
10
Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects.使用加强网进行打压植骨治疗Paprosky 3B型髋臼缺损的早期良好结果
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Mar;32(3):919-923. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.037. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of different reconstruction options using allografts in revision total hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.翻修全髋关节置换术中使用同种异体移植物的不同重建选择治疗严重髋臼骨缺损的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6403-6422. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04843-9. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?髋臼骨缺损的大小是否是使用打压植骨进行全髋关节置换翻修失败的预测因素?
Rev Bras Ortop. 2016 Jun 27;51(4):412-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2015.09.015. eCollection 2016 Jul-Aug.
3
CORR Insights(®): THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
CORR见解(®):使用带网片的打压植骨进行全髋关节置换翻修术对髋臼内侧缺损有效,但对髋臼外侧缺损效果不佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3892-3. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4540-2. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
4
THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.使用带网塞骨移植术进行全髋关节翻修术对髋臼内侧缺损有效,但对髋臼外侧缺损效果不佳。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Dec;473(12):3882-91. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7.
5
The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.带打压植骨的髋臼重建治疗大块骨缺损的生存和结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3304-13. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1395-4.