• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低相对压力下的低负荷阻力训练产生的肌肉变化与高负荷阻力训练相似。

Low-load resistance training with low relative pressure produces muscular changes similar to high-load resistance training.

作者信息

Kim Daeyeol, Loenneke Jeremy P, Ye Xin, Bemben Debra A, Beck Travis W, Larson Rebecca D, Bemben Michael G

机构信息

Department of Physical Education, Chonnam National University, Yongbong-Ro 77 Education Building 5-302, Buk-Gu, Gwang-Ju, South Korea, 61186.

Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA.

出版信息

Muscle Nerve. 2017 Dec;56(6):E126-E133. doi: 10.1002/mus.25626. Epub 2017 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1002/mus.25626
PMID:28224640
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study compares the acute and chronic response of high-load resistance training (HL) to low-load resistance training with low blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) pressure.

METHODS

Participants completed elbow flexion with either HL or LL-BFR or nonexercise. In the chronic study, participants in the HL and LL-BFR groups were trained for 8 weeks to determine differences in muscle size and strength. The acute study examined the changes in pretesting/posttesting (Pre/Post) torque, muscle swelling, and blood lactate.

RESULTS

In the chronic study, similar changes in muscle size and strength were observed for both HL and LL-BFR. In the acute study, Pre/Post changes in the torque, muscle swelling, and blood lactate were similar between HL and LL-BFR.

DISCUSSION

Our findings indicate that pressure as low as 50% arterial occlusion can produce similar changes in muscle mass and strength compared with traditional HL. Muscle Nerve 56: E126-E133, 2017.

摘要

引言

本研究比较了高负荷抗阻训练(HL)与低负荷抗阻训练加低血流限制(LL-BFR)压力的急性和慢性反应。

方法

参与者分别进行HL、LL-BFR训练或不进行训练的屈肘动作。在慢性研究中,HL组和LL-BFR组的参与者接受为期8周的训练,以确定肌肉大小和力量的差异。急性研究则检测了测试前/测试后(Pre/Post)扭矩、肌肉肿胀和血乳酸的变化。

结果

在慢性研究中,HL组和LL-BFR组的肌肉大小和力量变化相似。在急性研究中,HL组和LL-BFR组在扭矩、肌肉肿胀和血乳酸的Pre/Post变化相似。

讨论

我们的研究结果表明,与传统的HL相比,低至50%动脉闭塞压力可使肌肉质量和力量产生相似的变化。《肌肉与神经》56:E126-E133,2017年。

相似文献

1
Low-load resistance training with low relative pressure produces muscular changes similar to high-load resistance training.低相对压力下的低负荷阻力训练产生的肌肉变化与高负荷阻力训练相似。
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Dec;56(6):E126-E133. doi: 10.1002/mus.25626. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
2
Magnitude of Muscle Strength and Mass Adaptations Between High-Load Resistance Training Versus Low-Load Resistance Training Associated with Blood-Flow Restriction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高负荷抗阻训练与低负荷抗阻训练联合血流限制对肌肉力量和质量适应性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):361-378. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y.
3
Low-load blood flow restriction training induces similar morphological and mechanical Achilles tendon adaptations compared with high-load resistance training.低负荷血流限制训练引起的跟腱形态和力学适应性与高负荷抗阻训练相似。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 Dec 1;127(6):1660-1667. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00602.2019. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Acute cellular and molecular responses and chronic adaptations to low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance exercise in trained individuals.在训练有素的个体中,低负荷血流限制和高负荷抗阻运动的急性细胞和分子反应及慢性适应。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Dec 1;131(6):1731-1749. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00464.2021. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
5
Acute Muscular Responses to Practical Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Exercise Versus Traditional Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and High-/Low-Load Exercise.实用型低负荷血流限制训练与传统低负荷血流限制训练和高低负荷训练对肌肉的急性反应。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Dec 9;29(7):984-992. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0217. Print 2020 Sep 1.
6
Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction and High-Load Resistance Training Induce Comparable Changes in Patellar Tendon Properties.低负荷血流限制和高负荷抗阻训练引起髌腱性质的可比变化。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Apr 1;54(4):582-589. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002824.
7
Unilateral bicep curl hemodynamics: Low-pressure continuous vs high-pressure intermittent blood flow restriction.单侧二头肌弯举血流动力学:低压连续与高压间歇性血流限制
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Dec;25(6):770-7. doi: 10.1111/sms.12297. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
8
Similar patterns of tendon regional hypertrophy after low-load blood flow restriction and high-load resistance training.低负荷血流限制训练和高负荷抗阻训练后肌腱局部肥大的相似模式。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023 Jun;33(6):848-856. doi: 10.1111/sms.14321. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
9
Blood Flow Restricted Exercise Compared to High Load Resistance Exercise During Unloading.卸载期间血流限制运动与高负荷抗阻运动的比较。
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2016 Aug;87(8):688-96. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4566.2016.
10
Heavier and lighter load resistance training to momentary failure produce similar increases in strength with differing degrees of discomfort.较重和较轻负荷的抗阻训练至瞬间疲劳,会产生相似的力量增长,但不适程度不同。
Muscle Nerve. 2017 Oct;56(4):797-803. doi: 10.1002/mus.25537. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Unpacking the blood flow restriction device features literature - set/interface pressure: recommendations and considerations for an evolving field.剖析血流限制装置特性文献——设定/界面压力:对一个不断发展领域的建议与考量
Front Physiol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1627583. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1627583. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Isokinetic Strength Muscle Thickness and Athletic Performance.血流限制训练对等速肌力、肌肉厚度和运动表现的影响。
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2025 Jun 1;25(2):208-218.
3
Commentary: Blood flow restriction combined with resistance training on muscle strength and thickness improvement in young adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
评论:血流限制联合阻力训练对年轻人肌肉力量和厚度改善的影响:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归分析
Front Physiol. 2024 Oct 17;15:1486727. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1486727. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparing adaptations from blood flow restriction exercise training using regulated or unregulated pressure systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.比较使用调节或非调节压力系统的血流限制训练的适应性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Nov;38(11):1446-1465. doi: 10.1177/02692155241271040. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
5
Potential Moderators of the Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Meta-analysis Based on a Comparison with High-Load Resistance Training.血流限制训练对肌肉力量和肥大影响的潜在调节因素:基于与高负荷抗阻训练比较的荟萃分析
Sports Med Open. 2024 May 22;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00719-3.
6
Comparing the effect of intermittent blood flow restriction training and high-load resistance training in patients with patellofemoral pain: study protocol for a randomised trial.比较间歇血流限制训练和高负荷抗阻训练对髌股疼痛患者的效果:一项随机试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 21;13(10):e073188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073188.
7
Does Beta-Alanine Supplementation Potentiate Muscle Performance Following 6 Weeks of Blood Flow Restriction or Traditional Resistance Training?补充β-丙氨酸在6周的血流限制或传统抗阻训练后是否能增强肌肉表现?
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Aug 1;16(2):999-1011. doi: 10.70252/TCYG6960. eCollection 2023.
8
Low-Load x High-Load Resistance Exercise: Greater Cell Swelling After a Training Session.低负荷x高负荷抗阻训练:训练课后更大程度的细胞肿胀
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 May 1;16(3):513-524. doi: 10.70252/UIYF2129. eCollection 2023.
9
Effects of Training with Blood Flow Restriction on Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血流限制训练对肌肉力量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Dec 1;15(3):1563-1577. doi: 10.70252/TLFI8466. eCollection 2022.
10
Exercised-Induced Hypoalgesia following An Elbow Flexion Low-Load Resistance Exercise with Blood Flow Restriction: A Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial in Healthy Adults.肘部屈曲低负荷血流限制抗阻运动后的运动诱导性痛觉减退:一项针对健康成年人的假手术对照随机试验
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;10(12):2557. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122557.