Suppr超能文献

关于复杂对比训练我们了解多少?一项系统性综述。

What do we Know about Complex-Contrast Training? A Systematic Scoping Review.

作者信息

Thapa Rohit K, Weldon Anthony, Freitas Tomás T, Boullosa Daniel, Afonso José, Granacher Urs, Ramirez-Campillo Rodrigo

机构信息

Symbiosis School of Sports Sciences, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, 412115, India.

Centre for Life and Sport Sciences (CLaSS), Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, B15 3TN, UK.

出版信息

Sports Med Open. 2024 Sep 27;10(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00771-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The complex-contrast training (CCT) method utilizes two exercises with different loads and movement velocities in a set-by-set fashion to induce multiple neuromuscular adaptations. The speculated primary mechanism involves the post-activation potentiation or post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) of the muscles used during the heavy load (low velocity) exercise, thereby improving the performance of lower load (high velocity) exercise. However, no previous study has attempted to systematically synthesize the available evidence on CCT (e.g., if post-activation potentiation or PAPE was measured during the training sessions during the intervention period). This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on CCT using a systematic scoping review approach. More specifically, we identified gaps in the literature using an evidence gap map (EGM), and provided future directions for research.

METHODS

Three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched up to 20th February 2024. Data were extracted under a PICO framework: (a) Participants-related data (e.g., age, sex, type of sport); (b) Intervention-related data (e.g., duration of training); (c) Comparators (when available); and (d) Outcomes (e.g., measures of physical fitness). Interactive EGMs were created using the EPPI mapper software.

RESULTS

From the 5,695 records screened, 68 studies were eligible for inclusion, involving 1,821 participants (only 145 females from 5 studies). All CCT interventions lasted ≤ 16 weeks. More than half of the studies assessed countermovement jump, sprint, and maximal strength performances. No studies were identified which examined upper-body CCT exercises alone, and no study assessed PAPE during the CCT sessions. Overall, the available evidence was rated with a low level of confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, whether CCT produces a PAPE that translates into longitudinal performance gains remains unclear. Moreover, the available evidence on the effects of CCT on various outcomes provides low confidence regarding the most effective way to implement this training method, particularly among females, and beyond long-term interventions.

摘要

背景

复合对比训练(CCT)方法以每组的方式利用两种具有不同负荷和运动速度的练习来诱导多种神经肌肉适应性变化。推测的主要机制涉及在重负荷(低速度)练习期间所使用肌肉的激活后增强或激活后表现增强(PAPE),从而提高低负荷(高速度)练习的表现。然而,以前没有研究试图系统地综合关于CCT的现有证据(例如,在干预期的训练期间是否测量了激活后增强或PAPE)。本研究旨在使用系统的范围综述方法综合关于CCT的现有证据。更具体地说,我们使用证据缺口图(EGM)确定了文献中的差距,并提供了未来的研究方向。

方法

截至2024年2月20日,对三个电子数据库(PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science)进行了检索。在PICO框架下提取数据:(a)与参与者相关的数据(例如,年龄、性别、运动类型);(b)与干预相关的数据(例如,训练持续时间);(c)对照(如有);以及(d)结果(例如,身体素质测量)。使用EPPI mapper软件创建交互式EGM。

结果

在筛选的5695条记录中,有68项研究符合纳入标准,涉及1821名参与者(仅5项研究中的145名女性)。所有CCT干预持续时间≤16周。超过一半的研究评估了纵跳、短跑和最大力量表现。未发现单独研究上肢CCT练习的研究,也没有研究在CCT训练期间评估PAPE。总体而言,现有证据的置信度较低。

结论

总之,CCT是否会产生转化为长期表现提升的PAPE仍不清楚。此外,关于CCT对各种结果影响的现有证据对于实施这种训练方法的最有效方式,特别是在女性中以及长期干预之外,提供的置信度较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc78/11436572/5992398b4e6f/40798_2024_771_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验