• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谷歌学术个人资料在骨科中的应用。

Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics.

作者信息

Tetsworth Kevin, Fraser Dave, Glatt Vaida, Hohmann Erik

机构信息

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

2 University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499017690322. doi: 10.1177/2309499017690322.

DOI:10.1177/2309499017690322
PMID:28228048
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to survey the growth of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics over a 12-month period and to investigate global patterns.

METHODS

Data was prospectively acquired from June 2013 to June 2014. Google Scholar queries specific to orthopedic surgery were performed at 90-day intervals. Demographic aspects of each user were also compiled, including gender, current location, and primary interests. To determine differences between the growth of Google Scholar public profile registrations and citation counts, as well as differences in growth in different regions, repeated measures of analysis of variance (RMANOVA) were used.

RESULTS

RMANOVA revealed statistically significant differences ( p = 0.0001) for regional growth. The largest growth was observed in the United Kingdom ( p = 0.009, 289%), followed by the Asia-Pacific region ( p = 0.004, 177%) and "Other" ( p = 0.006, 172%). The mean growth per 90-day interval is 19.9% ( p = 0.003) and the mean 12-month growth is 107% ( p = 0.05). Statistically significant differences between gender (male vs. female) and basic and clinical sciences ( χ = 22.4, p = 0.0001) were observed.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests an exponential growth in the number of authors in the field of orthopedic surgery creating a Google Scholar public profile, and at the current rate participation doubles every 10.6 months.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是调查12个月内骨科领域谷歌学术公开资料的增长情况,并研究全球模式。

方法

前瞻性收集2013年6月至2014年6月的数据。每隔90天进行一次针对骨外科的谷歌学术查询。还收集了每个用户的人口统计学信息,包括性别、当前位置和主要兴趣。为了确定谷歌学术公开资料注册增长与引用次数之间的差异,以及不同地区增长的差异,使用了重复测量方差分析(RMANOVA)。

结果

RMANOVA显示区域增长存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.0001)。英国增长幅度最大(p = 0.009,289%),其次是亚太地区(p = 0.004,177%)和“其他”地区(p = 0.006,172%)。每90天间隔的平均增长率为19.9%(p = 0.003),12个月的平均增长率为107%(p = 0.05)。观察到性别(男性与女性)以及基础科学与临床科学之间存在统计学显著差异(χ = 22.4,p = 0.0001)。

结论

本研究表明,创建谷歌学术公开资料的骨外科领域作者数量呈指数增长,按照当前速度,参与人数每10.6个月翻一番。

相似文献

1
Use of Google Scholar public profiles in orthopedics.谷歌学术个人资料在骨科中的应用。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499017690322. doi: 10.1177/2309499017690322.
2
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.对发表在普通医学期刊上的文章在科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术中被引用情况的比较。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1092-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1307.
3
[Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment].[谷歌学术与生物医学领域的h指数:文献计量评估的普及]
Med Intensiva. 2013 Jun-Jul;37(5):343-54. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.01.008. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
4
Google Scholar versus PubMed in locating primary literature to answer drug-related questions.在查找用于回答药物相关问题的原始文献方面,谷歌学术与医学期刊数据库(PubMed)的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Mar;43(3):478-84. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L223. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
5
Subspecialty Variation in Academic Citations of Orthopedic Surgery Publications.骨科出版物学术引用的亚专业差异。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(4):569-574. doi: 10.4055/cios20263. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
6
Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.谷歌学术、Scopus 和 Web of Science 的收录情况:以护理专业中的 h 指数为例的研究。
Nurs Outlook. 2012 Nov-Dec;60(6):391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
7
The use of the Hirsch index in benchmarking hepatic surgery research.利用 Hirsch 指数对肝脏外科研究进行基准测试。
Am J Surg. 2013 Oct;206(4):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.01.037. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
8
"Publish or Perish" as citation metrics used to analyze scientific output in the humanities: International case studies in economics, geography, social sciences, philosophy, and history.“不发表就出局”作为用于分析人文学科科研产出的引文指标:经济学、地理学、社会科学、哲学和历史领域的国际案例研究
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008 Nov-Dec;56(6):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0043-0. Epub 2008 Dec 1.
9
Evaluation of the academic productivity of the top 100 worldwide physicians in the field of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery using the Google Scholar h-index as the bibliometrics ranking system.使用谷歌学术h指数作为文献计量排名系统,对全球耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学领域前100名医生的学术生产力进行评估。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Dec;132(12):1097-1101. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118002190.
10
Using Google Scholar to track the scholarly output of research groups.利用谷歌学术追踪研究小组的学术产出。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):201-205. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0515-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Institution Origin and Medical School Rank Impact the Citation Frequency and Publication Rate in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals.机构来源和医学院校排名对骨科运动医学期刊的引用频率和发表率有影响。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb 8;4(2):e295-e300. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.005. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Assessing the academic achievement of United States orthopaedic departments.评估美国骨科部门的学术成就。
World J Orthop. 2022 Feb 18;13(2):201-211. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i2.201.
3
Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio.
髋臼前突患者行全髋关节置换术的疗效。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Jul;4(7):e2000121. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00121.
4
Orthopaedic Academic Activity in the United States: Bibliometric Analysis of Publications by City and State.美国的骨科学术活动:按城市和州对出版物的文献计量分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Jul 23;2(7):e027. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00027. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
Trend in H₂S Biology and Medicine Research-A Bibliometric Analysis.H₂S 生物学和医学研究趋势——文献计量分析。
Molecules. 2017 Nov 29;22(12):2087. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122087.