美国的骨科学术活动：按城市和州对出版物的文献计量分析。
Orthopaedic Academic Activity in the United States: Bibliometric Analysis of Publications by City and State.
作者信息
Hohmann Erik, Glatt Vaida, Tetsworth Kevin
机构信息
Valiant Clinic/Houston Methodist Group, Dubai, United Arab Emirates (Dr. Hohmann); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa (Dr. Hohmann); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Center, San Antonio, TX (Dr. Glatt); the Orthopaedic Research Centre of Australia, Brisbane, Australia (Dr. Glatt and Dr. Tetsworth); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Australia (Dr. Tetsworth); and the Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia (Dr. Tetsworth).
出版信息
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Jul 23;2(7):e027. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00027. eCollection 2018 Jul.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to conduct a bibliometric analysis of orthopaedic academic output in the United States.
METHODS
Publications based on city and state origin, corrected for population size, median household income, total number of surgeons, and the number of various subspecialties were evaluated. The 15 highest-ranked orthopaedic journals were audited from 2010 to 2014 and then subdivided into anatomic regions and 14 subspecialties.
RESULTS
A total of 8,100 articles were published during the study period. Most originated from New York, California, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Minnesota. New York published the greatest number by city, followed by Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, and Rochester. When adjusted for the number of publications per city, surgeons per population, publications per surgeon population, publications per population, and publications per median income per capita, Vail and New York led in two and Stanford in one of the metrics.
CONCLUSIONS
New York was the leader for the total publications, greatest activity within subspecialties, and publications per surgeon/population and per median income/capita. Vail was the leader for publications/surgeon and population. The top four cities of New York, Philadelphia, Boston, and Chicago were responsible for 28% of the academic output over the 5-year study period.
背景
本研究旨在对美国骨科领域的学术产出进行文献计量分析。
方法
对基于城市和州来源的出版物进行评估，并根据人口规模、家庭收入中位数、外科医生总数以及各个亚专业的数量进行校正。对2010年至2014年排名前15的骨科期刊进行审核，然后按解剖区域和14个亚专业进行细分。
结果
在研究期间共发表了8100篇文章。大多数文章来自纽约、加利福尼亚、宾夕法尼亚、马萨诸塞和明尼苏达。按城市统计，纽约发表的文章数量最多，其次是费城、波士顿、芝加哥和罗切斯特。在对每个城市的出版物数量、每人口外科医生数量、每外科医生人口出版物数量、每人口出版物数量以及每人均收入中位数出版物数量进行调整后，韦尔和纽约在两项指标上领先，斯坦福在其中一项指标上领先。
结论
纽约在总出版物数量、亚专业内的最大活跃度以及每外科医生/人口和每人均收入/人口的出版物数量方面领先。韦尔在每外科医生和人口的出版物数量方面领先。在为期5年的研究期间，纽约、费城、波士顿和芝加哥这四个顶级城市贡献了28%的学术产出。
Zotero 插件