Hinsch Martin, Komdeur Jan
Computational and Systems Biology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK
TRÊS, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 7, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 22;284(1849). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2356.
Theoretical research on evolutionary aspects of territoriality has a long history. Existing studies, however, differ widely in modelling approach and research question. A generalized view on the evolution of territoriality is accordingly still missing. In this review, we show that territorial conflicts can be classified into qualitatively distinct types according to what mode of access to a territory which competitor attempts to gain. We argue that many of the inconsistencies between existing studies can be traced back to the fact that, while using the same terminology, different instances of these types of conflicts have been investigated. We discuss the connections of each type of conflict to existing research within the wider area of animal conflicts. We conclude that a clear conceptual separation of different types of territorial conflicts is helpful but that a more general theory of territoriality has to account for interdependencies between them and that a more mechanistic approach to modelling territoriality is needed.
关于领地性进化方面的理论研究有着悠久的历史。然而,现有的研究在建模方法和研究问题上差异很大。因此,关于领地性进化的普遍观点仍然缺失。在这篇综述中,我们表明,根据竞争者试图获得领地的进入模式,领地冲突可以被定性地分为不同类型。我们认为,现有研究之间的许多不一致之处可以追溯到这样一个事实,即虽然使用相同的术语,但对这些类型冲突的不同实例进行了研究。我们讨论了每种冲突类型与动物冲突更广泛领域内现有研究的联系。我们得出结论,对不同类型的领地冲突进行清晰的概念区分是有帮助的,但更普遍的领地性理论必须考虑它们之间的相互依存关系,并且需要一种更具机械性的方法来模拟领地性。