Suppr超能文献

用于探测动物社会决策神经基础的竞争与合作游戏。

Competitive and cooperative games for probing the neural basis of social decision-making in animals.

机构信息

Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Meinig School of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.

出版信息

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Jun;149:105158. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105158. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Abstract

In a social environment, it is essential for animals to consider the behavior of others when making decisions. To quantitatively assess such social decisions, games offer unique advantages. Games may have competitive and cooperative components, modeling situations with antagonistic and shared objectives between players. Games can be analyzed by mathematical frameworks, including game theory and reinforcement learning, such that an animal's choice behavior can be compared against the optimal strategy. However, so far games have been underappreciated in neuroscience research, particularly for rodent studies. In this review, we survey the varieties of competitive and cooperative games that have been tested, contrasting strategies employed by non-human primates and birds with rodents. We provide examples of how games can be used to uncover neural mechanisms and explore species-specific behavioral differences. We assess critically the limitations of current paradigms and propose improvements. Together, the synthesis of current literature highlights the advantages of using games to probe the neural basis of social decisions for neuroscience studies.

摘要

在社交环境中,动物在做决策时考虑他人的行为至关重要。为了定量评估这种社会决策,游戏提供了独特的优势。游戏可能具有竞争和合作成分,模拟玩家之间存在对抗性和共享目标的情况。可以通过数学框架(包括博弈论和强化学习)来分析游戏,从而可以将动物的选择行为与最佳策略进行比较。然而,到目前为止,游戏在神经科学研究中还未得到充分重视,特别是在啮齿动物研究中。在这篇综述中,我们调查了已测试的各种竞争性和合作性游戏,对比了非人类灵长类动物和鸟类与啮齿动物所采用的策略。我们提供了一些示例,说明如何使用游戏来揭示神经机制并探索特定于物种的行为差异。我们批判性地评估了当前范式的局限性,并提出了改进建议。综上所述,当前文献的综合分析强调了使用游戏来探究社会决策的神经基础在神经科学研究中的优势。

相似文献

2
Opponent Identity Influences Value Learning in Simple Games.对手身份会影响简单游戏中的价值学习。
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 5;35(31):11133-43. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3530-14.2015.
4
Cortical mechanisms for reinforcement learning in competitive games.竞争性游戏中强化学习的皮层机制。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 12;363(1511):3845-57. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0158.
5
10
Neural correlates of strategic reasoning during competitive games.竞技游戏中策略推理的神经关联
Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):340-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1256254. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

3
Dynamic influences on the neural encoding of social valence.社会效价的神经编码的动态影响。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2022 Sep;23(9):535-550. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00609-1. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
4
Learning, fast and slow.学习,快与慢。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2022 Aug;75:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2022.102555. Epub 2022 May 23.
6
9
Applying Reinforcement Learning to Rodent Stress Research.将强化学习应用于啮齿动物应激研究。
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2021 Feb 1;5:2470547020984732. doi: 10.1177/2470547020984732. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
10
Neuronal correlates of strategic cooperation in monkeys.猴子策略合作的神经元相关性。
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Jan;24(1):116-128. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00746-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验