Askheim Clemet, Sandset Tony, Engebretsen Eivind
Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Faculty of Humanities, Department of Cultural Studies and Oriental Languages, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Med Humanit. 2017 Mar;43(1):41-46. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011037. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
Over the last 20 years, the evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement has sought to develop standardised approaches to patient treatment by drawing on research results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane Collaboration and its eponym, Archie Cochrane, have become symbols of this development, and Cochrane's book from 1972 is often referred to as the first sketch of what was to become EBM. In this article, we claim that this construction of EBM's historical roots is based on a selective reading of Cochrane's text. Through a close reading of this text, we show that the principal aim of modern EBM, namely to warrant clinical decisions based on evidence drawn from RCTs, is part of Cochrane's original project. He had more modest ambitions for what RCTs can accomplish, and, more importantly, he was more concerned with care and equality than are his followers in the EBM movement. We try to reconstruct some of Cochrane's lost legacy and to articulate some of the important silences in From these clues it might be possible, we argue, to remodel EBM in a broader, more pluralistic, more democratic and less authoritarian manner.
在过去20年里,循证医学(EBM)运动一直试图通过借鉴随机对照试验(RCT)的研究结果来开发标准化的患者治疗方法。考克兰协作网及其同名创始人阿奇·考克兰已成为这一发展的象征,考克兰1972年出版的著作常被视为循证医学雏形的首次勾勒。在本文中,我们认为这种对循证医学历史根源的构建基于对考克兰文本的选择性解读。通过仔细研读该文本,我们发现现代循证医学的主要目标,即基于随机对照试验得出的证据来保证临床决策,是考克兰最初计划的一部分。他对随机对照试验所能达成的目标期望更为适度,更重要的是,相较于循证医学运动中的追随者,他更关注医疗护理和平等问题。我们试图重构考克兰一些被遗忘的遗产,并阐明其中一些重要的被忽视之处。我们认为,从这些线索出发,有可能以一种更广泛、更多元、更民主且更少独裁的方式重塑循证医学。