Gutin Iliya
The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 155 Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
Soc Theory Health. 2018 Aug;16(3):256-271. doi: 10.1057/s41285-017-0055-0. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
Recent work in medical sociology has provided critical insights into distinguishing between obesity as a condition with severe individual- and population-level health consequences, and obesity as a socially undesirable, stigmatizing construct opposing thinness as the healthy ideal. Less often considered is the role of Body Mass Index (BMI) as the standard by which obesity and healthy weight are measured and defined. Addressing this issue, I begin by distinguishing between BMI as an empirical, objective measure of health, and BMI as an arbitrary, subjective label for categorizing the population. I further consider how BMI is empowered as a measurable quantity through the lens of medicalization and evidence-based medicine, and introduce the "performativity" of BMI as a superior framework for confronting the measure's conceptual limitations. Emphasizing key parallels between BMI and self-rated health as measures with high predictive validity, yet unspecified mechanisms of action, I propose an epistemological shift away from classifying BMI as a biomarker and toward a more flexible view of the measure as a holistic appraisal of health. In closing, I argue that researchers may continue to leverage BMI's ease of collection and interpretation, provided they are attuned to its definitional ambiguity across diverse research methods and contexts.
医学社会学领域的近期研究为区分肥胖提供了批判性见解,一种是作为对个人和人群健康有严重后果的状况的肥胖,另一种是作为一种社会上不受欢迎的、将瘦视为健康理想对立面的污名化概念的肥胖。人们较少考虑体重指数(BMI)作为衡量和定义肥胖及健康体重的标准所起的作用。为解决这个问题,我首先区分作为健康的实证性、客观衡量指标的BMI和作为对人群进行分类的任意、主观标签的BMI。我进一步探讨了BMI如何通过医学化和循证医学的视角被赋予可测量的属性,并引入BMI的“ performativity”作为应对该指标概念局限性的更优框架。我强调BMI与自我评估健康之间的关键相似之处,它们都是具有高预测效度但作用机制不明的指标,我提议进行一种认识论上的转变,即不再将BMI归类为生物标志物,而是以更灵活的视角将该指标视为对健康的整体评估。最后,我认为研究人员可以继续利用BMI易于收集和解释的特点,前提是他们要意识到BMI在不同研究方法和背景下定义的模糊性。