Suppr超能文献

我们信赖身体质量指数:将身体质量指数重新定义为一种健康衡量指标。

In BMI We Trust: Reframing the Body Mass Index as a Measure of Health.

作者信息

Gutin Iliya

机构信息

The University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 155 Hamilton Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.

出版信息

Soc Theory Health. 2018 Aug;16(3):256-271. doi: 10.1057/s41285-017-0055-0. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

Abstract

Recent work in medical sociology has provided critical insights into distinguishing between obesity as a condition with severe individual- and population-level health consequences, and obesity as a socially undesirable, stigmatizing construct opposing thinness as the healthy ideal. Less often considered is the role of Body Mass Index (BMI) as the standard by which obesity and healthy weight are measured and defined. Addressing this issue, I begin by distinguishing between BMI as an empirical, objective measure of health, and BMI as an arbitrary, subjective label for categorizing the population. I further consider how BMI is empowered as a measurable quantity through the lens of medicalization and evidence-based medicine, and introduce the "performativity" of BMI as a superior framework for confronting the measure's conceptual limitations. Emphasizing key parallels between BMI and self-rated health as measures with high predictive validity, yet unspecified mechanisms of action, I propose an epistemological shift away from classifying BMI as a biomarker and toward a more flexible view of the measure as a holistic appraisal of health. In closing, I argue that researchers may continue to leverage BMI's ease of collection and interpretation, provided they are attuned to its definitional ambiguity across diverse research methods and contexts.

摘要

医学社会学领域的近期研究为区分肥胖提供了批判性见解,一种是作为对个人和人群健康有严重后果的状况的肥胖,另一种是作为一种社会上不受欢迎的、将瘦视为健康理想对立面的污名化概念的肥胖。人们较少考虑体重指数(BMI)作为衡量和定义肥胖及健康体重的标准所起的作用。为解决这个问题,我首先区分作为健康的实证性、客观衡量指标的BMI和作为对人群进行分类的任意、主观标签的BMI。我进一步探讨了BMI如何通过医学化和循证医学的视角被赋予可测量的属性,并引入BMI的“ performativity”作为应对该指标概念局限性的更优框架。我强调BMI与自我评估健康之间的关键相似之处,它们都是具有高预测效度但作用机制不明的指标,我提议进行一种认识论上的转变,即不再将BMI归类为生物标志物,而是以更灵活的视角将该指标视为对健康的整体评估。最后,我认为研究人员可以继续利用BMI易于收集和解释的特点,前提是他们要意识到BMI在不同研究方法和背景下定义的模糊性。

相似文献

4
5
10
BMI-related errors in the measurement of obesity.肥胖测量中与体重指数相关的误差。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Aug;32 Suppl 3:S56-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.87.

引用本文的文献

1
Body Mass Index and Postsurgical Outcomes in Older Adults.老年人的体重指数与术后结果
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2528875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.28875.
3
Exploring obesity phenotypes: a longitudinal perspective.探索肥胖表型:纵向视角
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11154-025-09976-3.
9
Behavioral and Nutritional Needs of Transgender and Gender Diverse Patients.跨性别和性别多样化患者的行为与营养需求
Transgend Health. 2025 Feb 10;10(1):104-108. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0108. eCollection 2025 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Who cares? The lost legacy of Archie Cochrane.谁在乎呢?阿奇·科克伦失落的遗产。
Med Humanit. 2017 Mar;43(1):41-46. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011037. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
3
Changing the endpoints for determining effective obesity management.改变有效肥胖管理的终点指标。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;57(4):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 25.
6
Standards and classification: a perspective on the 'obesity epidemic'.标准与分类:透视“肥胖流行”
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Jun;87:9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
7
The "obesity paradox" explained.“肥胖悖论”解析。
Epidemiology. 2013 May;24(3):461-2. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31828c776c.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验