• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雷米普利与替米沙坦对高血压患者内皮功能改善作用的反应性充血指数比较

Comparison of endothelial function improvement estimated with reactive hyperemia index between ramipril and telmisartan in hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Ki You-Jeong, Seo Jae-Bin, Kim Hack-Lyoung, Lim Woo-Hyun, Seo Hye Yeon, Lee Jin Yong, Chung Woo-Young

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Hypertens. 2017 Feb 15;23:4. doi: 10.1186/s40885-016-0060-y. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40885-016-0060-y
PMID:28228970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5309991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endothelium has a function to regulate vascular tone by releasing mediators either vasodilating or vasoconstricting blood vessels. Endothelial dysfunction can be measured conveniently by Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) with a peripheral arterial tonometry. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II (AT II) receptor blockers (ARBs) are considered to have beneficial effects on endothelium through inhibition of AT II. This study was performed to compare the effect of ACEIs or ARBs on endothelial function estimated by RHI in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with hypertension (57.9 ± 11.3 years, 60% men) were assigned to receive treatment with ramipril or telmisartan for eight weeks ( 10 per group). Blood pressure (BP) and RHI were measured at baseline and after eight weeks treatment.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in terms of demographic and laboratory characteristics. But baseline systolic BP and pulse pressure (PP) were higher in telmisartan group than ramipril group (systolic BP, 159 ± 6.83 vs 150 ± 7.49,  0.028; PP, 75.0 ± 14.0 vs 60.3 ± 12.4,  0.034). In both groups, systolic and diastolic BP decreased significantly after eight weeks treatment (p < 0.05 for each). Although PP reduced in both group (ramipril group, 60.3 ± 12.4 mm Hg to 50.4 ± 7.60 mm Hg; telmisartan group, 75.0 ± 14.0 mm Hg to 57.4 ± 15.1 mm Hg), change was statistically remarkable only in telmisartan group. During eight weeks, there was no significant changes of RHI in both groups. There was a positive relationship between decrease of PP after 8 weeks and the improvement of endothelial function only in ramipril group, but not in telmisartan group (ramipril group,  = 0.671,  0.034; telmisartan group,  = -0.487,  0.153).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite PP reduction effect favoring endothelial function, it's not correlated with RHI improvement with telmisartan. These findings suggest telmisartan itself may negatively influence endothelium dependent vasodilatation different from ramipril.

摘要

背景

内皮细胞具有通过释放使血管舒张或收缩的介质来调节血管张力的功能。内皮功能障碍可通过外周动脉张力测定法的反应性充血指数(RHI)方便地进行测量。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)和血管紧张素II(AT II)受体阻滞剂(ARBs)被认为通过抑制AT II对内皮细胞有有益作用。本研究旨在比较ACEIs或ARBs对高血压患者中通过RHI评估的内皮功能的影响。

方法

连续纳入20例高血压患者(年龄57.9±11.3岁,男性占60%),分为两组,每组10例,分别接受雷米普利或替米沙坦治疗8周。在基线及治疗8周后测量血压(BP)和RHI。

结果

两组在人口统计学和实验室特征方面相似。但替米沙坦组的基线收缩压和脉压(PP)高于雷米普利组(收缩压,159±6.83 vs 150±7.49,P = 0.028;PP,75.0±14.0 vs 60.3±12.4,P = 0.034)。两组治疗8周后收缩压和舒张压均显著下降(每组P < 0.05)。虽然两组的PP均降低(雷米普利组,60.3±12.4 mmHg降至50.4±7.60 mmHg;替米沙坦组,75.0±14.0 mmHg降至57.4±15.1 mmHg),但仅替米沙坦组的变化有统计学意义。在8周期间,两组的RHI均无显著变化。仅在雷米普利组,8周后PP的降低与内皮功能的改善呈正相关,而替米沙坦组无此相关性(雷米普利组,r = 0.671,P = 0.034;替米沙坦组,r = -0.487,P = 0.153)。

结论

尽管替米沙坦降低PP的作用有利于内皮功能,但与RHI的改善无关。这些发现提示替米沙坦本身可能与雷米普利不同,会对内皮依赖性血管舒张产生负面影响。

相似文献

1
Comparison of endothelial function improvement estimated with reactive hyperemia index between ramipril and telmisartan in hypertensive patients.雷米普利与替米沙坦对高血压患者内皮功能改善作用的反应性充血指数比较
Clin Hypertens. 2017 Feb 15;23:4. doi: 10.1186/s40885-016-0060-y. eCollection 2017.
2
A multicenter, 14-week study of telmisartan and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.一项使用动态血压监测对轻度至中度高血压患者进行的替米沙坦和雷米普利的多中心、为期14周的研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2006 Jan;19(1):104-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.10.001.
3
Effects of telmisartan and ramipril on adiponectin and blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes.替米沙坦和雷米普利对2型糖尿病患者脂联素及血压的影响
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Dec;21(12):1330-6. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.297. Epub 2008 Nov 6.
4
Ventricular and vascular remodelling effects of the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan and/or the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in hypertensive patients.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂替米沙坦和/或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利对高血压患者心室及血管重塑的影响
J Int Med Res. 2005;33 Suppl 1:39A-49A. doi: 10.1177/14732300050330S106.
5
Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.替米沙坦、雷米普利或两者联合用于血管事件高危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1547-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801317. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
6
Antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan vs ramipril over the 24-h dosing period, including the critical early morning hours: a pooled analysis of the PRISMA I and II randomized trials.替米沙坦与雷米普利在24小时给药期间(包括关键的清晨时段)的降压疗效:PRISMA I和II随机试验的汇总分析
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Sep;23(9):610-9. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.4. Epub 2009 Feb 19.
7
Ambulatory blood pressure values in the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET).在替米沙坦单药治疗和替米沙坦与雷米普利联合治疗全球终点试验(ONTARGET)中的动态血压值。
Hypertension. 2012 Dec;60(6):1400-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.199562. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
8
Effects of oral fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus ramipril and losartan plus ramipril in hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase iii trial in adult indian patients.替米沙坦联合雷米普利及氯沙坦联合雷米普利口服固定剂量复方制剂治疗高血压的效果:一项针对成年印度患者的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、III期试验。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005 Nov;66(6):630-42. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.007.
9
A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of telmisartan, amlodipine and ramipril in patients with confirmed ambulatory hypertension.替米沙坦、氨氯地平和雷米普利在确诊的动态高血压患者中的疗效及作用持续时间比较。
Blood Press Monit. 2004 Oct;9(5):231-6. doi: 10.1097/00126097-200410000-00001.
10
The prospective, randomized investigation of the safety and efficacy of telmisartan versus ramipril using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (PRISMA I).使用动态血压监测对替米沙坦与雷米普利的安全性和疗效进行前瞻性随机研究(PRISMA I)。
J Hypertens. 2006 Jan;24(1):193-200. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000194364.11516.ab.

引用本文的文献

1
Endothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Emerging Therapeutic Modality?内皮功能障碍与心血管疾病:高压氧治疗会成为一种新兴的治疗方式吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Dec 19;11(12):408. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11120408.
2
ACE inhibitors and their interaction with systems and molecules involved in metabolism.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂及其与参与代谢的系统和分子的相互作用。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 14;10(2):e24655. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24655. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
3
Novel use of structural equation modelling to examine diet and metabolic traits associated with microvascular endothelial dysfunction in middle-aged Chinese males: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Angiotensin II receptor blockers improve peripheral endothelial function: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂可改善外周血管内皮功能:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 3;9(3):e90217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090217. eCollection 2014.
2
The assessment of endothelial function: from research into clinical practice.内皮功能评估:从研究到临床实践。
Circulation. 2012 Aug 7;126(6):753-67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.093245.
3
Pulse pressure is a predictor of vascular endothelial function in middle-aged subjects with no apparent heart disease.
利用结构方程模型研究中年中国男性饮食和代谢特征与微血管内皮功能障碍的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 13;13(9):e073357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073357.
4
Microvascular Endothelial Function Assessed Using Peripheral Arterial Tonometry in Adolescents with Repaired Congenital Heart Disease.采用外周动脉张力测定法评估青少年先天性心脏病修复术后的微血管内皮功能。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2024 Dec;45(8):1804-1810. doi: 10.1007/s00246-023-03283-x. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
5
Reactive Hyperemia Index Associated With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Under Treatment for Lifestyle Diseases.与接受生活方式疾病治疗的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病相关的反应性充血指数
J Clin Med Res. 2020 May;12(5):293-299. doi: 10.14740/jocmr4100. Epub 2020 May 8.
6
Endothelial function estimated by digital reactive hyperemia in patients with atherosclerotic risk factors or coronary artery disease.通过数字反应性充血评估有动脉粥样硬化危险因素或冠状动脉疾病患者的内皮功能。
Heart Vessels. 2018 Jul;33(7):706-712. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-1118-4. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
脉压是无明显心脏病的中年患者血管内皮功能的预测因子。
Vasc Med. 2010 Aug;15(4):299-305. doi: 10.1177/1358863X10373300.
4
Endothelial effects of antihypertensive treatment: focus on irbesartan.抗高血压治疗对内皮的影响:聚焦于厄贝沙坦。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(1):89-101. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2008.04.01.89.
5
Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events.替米沙坦、雷米普利或两者联合用于血管事件高危患者。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1547-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801317. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
6
Blood pressure-dependent and independent effects of agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin system.抑制肾素-血管紧张素系统药物的血压依赖性及非依赖性作用
J Hypertens. 2007 May;25(5):951-8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3280bad9b4.
7
Angiotensin receptor blockers do not increase risk of myocardial infarction.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂不会增加心肌梗死的风险。
Circulation. 2006 Aug 22;114(8):855-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594978.
8
Angiotensin receptor blockers may increase risk of myocardial infarction: unraveling the ARB-MI paradox.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂可能增加心肌梗死风险:解析ARB-MI悖论。
Circulation. 2006 Aug 22;114(8):838-54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.594986.
9
How to explain the differences between renin angiotensin system modulators.如何解释肾素-血管紧张素系统调节剂之间的差异。
Am J Hypertens. 2005 Sep;18(9 Pt 2):134S-141S. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.005.
10
Increased ambulatory pulse pressure is a strong risk factor for coronary endothelial vasomotor dysfunction.动态脉压升高是冠状动脉内皮血管运动功能障碍的一个重要危险因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1461-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.038.