作为社区参与式研究中基层参与方法的“家庭聊天”：彼得斯堡的“我们”项目

House Chats as a Grassroots Engagement Methodology in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project, Petersburg.

作者信息

Mosavel Maghboeba, Ferrell Dwala, LaRose Jessica Gokee

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):391-400. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0046.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2016.0046

PMID:28230547

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5733140/

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Wellness Engagement (WE) Project is an academic-community partnership developed to engage the community to inform the development of a pilot intervention aimed at promoting healthy eating and physical activity among residents of Petersburg, Virginia.

OBJECTIVES

To implement House Chats as a novel methodology for engaging community members in focused discussion about obesity, exercise, dietary intake, and barriers to health.

METHODS

We recruited and trained laypersons as House Chat Leaders (HCLs) to host informal group discussions about obesity with members of their network in a social setting following predetermined questions.

RESULTS

HCLs hosted 34 House Chats with 176 participants over a period of 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The House Chat proved to be a highly successful engagement strategy that allowed access to respondents who may not have participated in a traditional, focus group discussion.

摘要

未标注

健康参与（WE）项目是一个学术与社区的合作项目，旨在让社区参与其中，为一项试点干预措施的制定提供信息，该干预措施旨在促进弗吉尼亚州彼得斯堡居民的健康饮食和体育活动。

目标

实施家庭聊天作为一种新颖的方法，让社区成员参与关于肥胖、运动、饮食摄入和健康障碍的重点讨论。

方法

我们招募并培训外行人作为家庭聊天领导者（HCL），按照预先确定的问题，在社交环境中与他们社交网络中的成员就肥胖问题进行非正式小组讨论。

结果

家庭聊天领导者在4个月的时间里主持了34次家庭聊天，有176名参与者。

结论

家庭聊天被证明是一种非常成功的参与策略，能够接触到那些可能不会参加传统焦点小组讨论的受访者。

相似文献

House Chats as a Grassroots Engagement Methodology in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project, Petersburg.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):391-400. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0046.

Engaging the Dan River Region to reduce obesity: application of the Comprehensive Participatory Planning and Evaluation process.

Fam Community Health. 2012 Jan-Mar;35(1):44-56. doi: 10.1097/FCH.0b013e3182385cd9.

Community voices in program development: the wisdom of individuals with incarceration experience.

Can J Public Health. 2012 Jul 18;103(5):e379-83. doi: 10.1007/BF03404446.

Translating evidence-based behavioral weight loss into a multi-level, community intervention within a community-based participatory research framework: the Wellness Engagement (WE) Project.

Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):1235-1243. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa140.

Developing an obesity intervention in Micronesia: From needs assessment to planning.

Eval Program Plann. 2018 Aug;69:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 5.

Assessing tribal youth physical activity and programming using a community-based participatory research approach.

Public Health Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;27(2):104-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2010.00833.x.

Combining Photovoice and focus groups: engaging Latina teens in community assessment.

Am J Prev Med. 2013 Mar;44(3 Suppl 3):S215-24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.11.011.

Developing a transcultural academic-community partnership to arrest obesity.

Int Q Community Health Educ. 2013;34(3):215-33. doi: 10.2190/IQ.34.3.b.

Rural Oregon community perspectives: introducing community-based participatory research into a community health coalition.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Fall;7(3):313-22. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0032.

Process evaluation of a community-based adolescent obesity prevention project in Tonga.

BMC Public Health. 2011 May 9;11:284. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-284.

引用本文的文献

Translating evidence-based behavioral weight loss into a multi-level, community intervention within a community-based participatory research framework: the Wellness Engagement (WE) Project.

Transl Behav Med. 2021 Jun 17;11(6):1235-1243. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa140.

Responsiveness and adaptability in community engaged biobanking research: experiences from a Hispanic community.

J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):395-406. doi: 10.1007/s12687-018-0397-x. Epub 2019 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

CIRTification: Training in Human Research Protections for Community-Engaged Research Partners.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):283-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0044.

The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: a conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy.

Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):1615-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301961. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

Engaging patients and their loved ones in the ultimate conversation.

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):203-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1174.

Community-based participatory research and the challenges of qualitative analysis enacted by lay, nurse, and academic researchers.

Res Nurs Health. 2012 Oct;35(5):550-9. doi: 10.1002/nur.21494. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

Lessons learned from undertaking community-based participatory research dissertations: the trials and triumphs of two junior health scholars.

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):347-56. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0019.

More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.

J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Aug;21(3):879-97. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0323.

The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes.

Am J Public Health. 2008 Aug;98(8):1407-17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.113571. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

Using community-based participatory research to develop a culturally sensitive smoking cessation intervention with public housing neighborhoods.

Ethn Dis. 2007 Spring;17(2):331-7.

The effect of involvement in participatory research on parent researchers in a Sure Start programme.

Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Nov;14(6):465-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00632.x.

A case study in the use of community-based participatory research in public health nursing.

Public Health Nurs. 2006 Sep-Oct;23(5):472-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00585.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

作为社区参与式研究中基层参与方法的“家庭聊天”：彼得斯堡的“我们”项目

House Chats as a Grassroots Engagement Methodology in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project, Petersburg.

作者信息

Mosavel Maghboeba, Ferrell Dwala, LaRose Jessica Gokee

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):391-400. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0046.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2016.0046

PMID:28230547

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5733140/

Abstract

UNLABELLED

OBJECTIVES

To implement House Chats as a novel methodology for engaging community members in focused discussion about obesity, exercise, dietary intake, and barriers to health.

METHODS

We recruited and trained laypersons as House Chat Leaders (HCLs) to host informal group discussions about obesity with members of their network in a social setting following predetermined questions.

RESULTS

HCLs hosted 34 House Chats with 176 participants over a period of 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The House Chat proved to be a highly successful engagement strategy that allowed access to respondents who may not have participated in a traditional, focus group discussion.

摘要

未标注

目标

实施家庭聊天作为一种新颖的方法，让社区成员参与关于肥胖、运动、饮食摄入和健康障碍的重点讨论。

方法

我们招募并培训外行人作为家庭聊天领导者（HCL），按照预先确定的问题，在社交环境中与他们社交网络中的成员就肥胖问题进行非正式小组讨论。

结果

家庭聊天领导者在4个月的时间里主持了34次家庭聊天，有176名参与者。

结论

家庭聊天被证明是一种非常成功的参与策略，能够接触到那些可能不会参加传统焦点小组讨论的受访者。

作为社区参与式研究中基层参与方法的“家庭聊天”：彼得斯堡的“我们”项目

House Chats as a Grassroots Engagement Methodology in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project, Petersburg.

作者信息

出版信息

UNLABELLED

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

未标注

目标

方法

结果

结论

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

作为社区参与式研究中基层参与方法的“家庭聊天”：彼得斯堡的“我们”项目

House Chats as a Grassroots Engagement Methodology in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project, Petersburg.

作者信息

出版信息

UNLABELLED

OBJECTIVES

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSIONS

未标注

目标

方法

结果

结论