• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CIRT认证:面向社区参与研究伙伴的人类研究保护培训。

CIRTification: Training in Human Research Protections for Community-Engaged Research Partners.

作者信息

Anderson Emily E

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):283-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0044.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2015.0044
PMID:26412769
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4711932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Human research ethics training should provide relevant, meaningful information and build skills. Compliance should not be the only goal; training should also enhance knowledge, skills, and capacity. However, most currently available human research ethics training programs are geared toward learners who already have some research experience and working knowledge of research methods (e.g., graduate students, junior researchers); many community partners, however, have little or no prior exposure to research. More important, standard training programs do not adequately address the unique context of community-engaged research (CEnR).

OBJECTIVES

This article describes the development process, final curricular materials, and suggestions for successful implementation of CIRTification, a human research ethics training program designed specifically for community research partners who will be working on the "frontlines" of research.

METHODS

Development of CIRTification involved an extensive literature review, consultation with stakeholders including community partners, academic researchers, and human research protection program personnel.

CONCLUSIONS

The curriculum, as well as information and materials to help potential users promote acceptance of the curriculum by their local institutional review boards (IRBs), are freely available online at www.go.uic.edu/CIRT. Ideally, community research partners who complete CIRTification will not only learn about the importance of protecting research participants but also be empowered to substantially contribute to the ethical practices of their respective research collaborations.

摘要

背景

人类研究伦理培训应提供相关且有意义的信息并培养技能。合规不应是唯一目标;培训还应增强知识、技能和能力。然而,目前大多数现有的人类研究伦理培训项目是针对那些已经有一定研究经验和研究方法实用知识的学习者(例如研究生、初级研究人员);然而,许多社区合作伙伴几乎没有或完全没有研究方面的前期接触。更重要的是,标准培训项目没有充分考虑社区参与研究(CEnR)的独特背景。

目的

本文描述了CIRTification的开发过程、最终课程材料以及成功实施的建议,CIRTification是一个专门为将在研究“前线”工作的社区研究合作伙伴设计的人类研究伦理培训项目。

方法

CIRTification的开发涉及广泛的文献综述,与包括社区合作伙伴、学术研究人员和人类研究保护项目人员在内的利益相关者进行磋商。

结论

该课程以及帮助潜在用户促使其当地机构审查委员会(IRB)接受该课程的信息和材料可在www.go.uic.edu/CIRT上免费在线获取。理想情况下,完成CIRTification的社区研究合作伙伴不仅将了解保护研究参与者的重要性,而且将有能力为各自研究合作的伦理实践做出重大贡献。

相似文献

1
CIRTification: Training in Human Research Protections for Community-Engaged Research Partners.CIRT认证:面向社区参与研究伙伴的人类研究保护培训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):283-8. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0044.
2
Engaging Institutional Review Boards in Developing a Brief, Community-Responsive Human Subjects Training for Community Partners.让机构审查委员会参与制定一份简短的、响应社区需求的社区合作伙伴人类受试者培训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2016;10(3):471-477. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2016.0053.
3
Community Partnered Research Ethics Training in Practice: A Collaborative Approach to Certification.实践中的社区合作研究伦理培训:认证的协作方法
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Apr;11(2):97-105. doi: 10.1177/1556264616650802. Epub 2016 May 30.
4
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
5
Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study.学术与社区合作伙伴对参与者保护和研究诚信的看法:一项焦点小组试点研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):20-31. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.20.
6
Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda.社区参与研究的研究伦理教育:综述与研究议程
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr;7(2):3-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3.
7
Viewpoint: developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research.观点:发展研究伦理咨询服务以促进积极且负责的临床研究
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):900-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318132f0ee.
8
Nine key functions for a human subjects protection program for community-engaged research: points to consider.社区参与研究的人体受试者保护计划的九项关键功能:需考虑的要点。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar;5(1):33-47. doi: 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.33.
9
"Community 101 for researchers": an online training program to build capacity for ethical community-engaged research with Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders.“研究人员社区 101”:一个在线培训项目,旨在培养与夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民进行道德社区参与式研究的能力。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1121748. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1121748. eCollection 2023.
10
Convergence Despite Divergence: Views of Academic and Community Stakeholders about the Ethics of Community-Engaged Research.尽管存在分歧,但仍有共识:学术和社区利益相关者对社区参与式研究的伦理观点。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):309-316. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.309. eCollection 2019 Spring.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing Tobacco-Related Disparities Among Youth Experiencing Homelessness by Engaging Youth Collaborators in Intervention Research: Protocol for a Multimethod, Community-Based Participatory Research Study.通过让青年合作者参与干预研究来解决无家可归青年中与烟草相关的差异:一项多方法、基于社区的参与性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 19;14:e69441. doi: 10.2196/69441.
2
Community Based Participatory Research in Global Health: Time to Provide Appropriate Ethics Training for Community Researchers.全球卫生领域基于社区的参与性研究:是时候为社区研究人员提供适当的伦理培训了。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251350492. doi: 10.1177/00469580251350492. Epub 2025 Jul 3.
3
Optimizing diabetes management interventions for Black and Hispanic adults using the multiphase optimization strategy: Protocol for a randomized mixed methods factorial trial.使用多阶段优化策略为黑人和西班牙裔成年人优化糖尿病管理干预措施:一项随机混合方法析因试验的方案
Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Feb;149:107804. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107804. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
4
Study design and protocol for Nourishing Beginnings, an integrated service delivery model addressing food insecurity and social needs of low-income pregnant individuals.《滋养开端研究设计与方案》:一个综合服务交付模式,旨在解决低收入孕妇的粮食不安全和社会需求问题。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;133:107310. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107310. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
5
Addressing institutional and community barriers to development and implementation of community-engaged research through competency-based academic and community training.通过基于能力的学术和社区培训,解决社区参与式研究的发展和实施中的制度和社区障碍。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;10:1070475. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1070475. eCollection 2022.
6
Preliminary Evaluation of a Citizen Scientist Educational Curriculum Aimed at Engaging Black Men in Lung Cancer Early Detection Screening.面向参与肺癌早期检测筛查的黑人男性的公民科学家教育课程的初步评估。
Am J Mens Health. 2022 May-Jun;16(3):15579883221099417. doi: 10.1177/15579883221099417.
7
Peer Support Specialists' Perspectives of a Standard Online Research Ethics Training: Qualitative Study.同伴支持专家对标准在线研究伦理培训的看法:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Feb 1;6(2):e29073. doi: 10.2196/29073.
8
A Community-Based Participatory Approach to the Development and Implementation of an HIV Health Behavior Intervention: Lessons Learned in Navigating Research and Practice Systems from Project HAPPY.基于社区的参与式方法开发和实施艾滋病毒健康行为干预:从 HAPPY 项目中汲取的经验教训,用于探索研究和实践系统。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 8;17(2):399. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020399.
9
Translating a stress management intervention for rural Latina breast cancer survivors: The Nuevo Amanecer-II.将一项压力管理干预措施翻译成农村拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者的语言:Nuevo Amanecer-II。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0224068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224068. eCollection 2019.
10
Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.约旦调查员对伦理审查委员会重要性的认识:一项初步研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):821-831. doi: 10.1007/s11948-019-00139-7. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study.学术与社区合作伙伴对参与者保护和研究诚信的看法:一项焦点小组试点研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):20-31. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.20.
2
Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda.社区参与研究的研究伦理教育:综述与研究议程
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr;7(2):3-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2012.7.2.3.
3
Human subjects protection training for community workers: an example from "Faith Moves Mountains".社区工作者的人体受试者保护培训:以“信念移山”为例。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2007 Fall;1(3):257-65. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2007.0022.
4
New graduate students' baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research.新研究生关于科研行为责任的基础知识。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):838-45. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7956.