Suppr超能文献

从开展基于社区的参与性研究论文中吸取的经验教训:两位初级健康学者的试验与成功

Lessons learned from undertaking community-based participatory research dissertations: the trials and triumphs of two junior health scholars.

作者信息

Khobzi Nooshin, Flicker Sarah

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Univetsity of Western Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):347-56. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For graduate students addressing health issues pertinent to marginalized communities, community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods may be an appropriate mode of inquiry. Although there are a number of useful guides on conducting traditional doctoral dissertations (TDD), there is a paucity of similar resources for students engaged in CBPR.

OBJECTIVES

Drawing on our own experiences, we aimed to describe the key lessons learned from doing participatory doctoral research. Furthermore, this paper outlines 6 suggestions for those who may be considering or already conducting a CBPR dissertation. Suggestions are derived from elements of the CBPR process that were employed in our own projects.

LESSONS LEARNED

Upon reflection on our experiences conducting CBPR dissertations, we identified 4 lessons learned: (1) to understand the differences between TDDs and the CBPR approach; (2) to be aware of and able to clearly articulate the advantages of CBPR doctoral dissertations; (3) to acknowledge and plan for the possible challenges of CBPR doctoral research; and (4) to recognize aspects of the CBPR process that contribute to the successful completion of doctoral projects.

CONCLUSION

This paper provides an additional resource for doctoral students, based on our own experiences working on CBPR projects. Despite many of the obstacles and challenges, we found the process of engaging in CBPR dissertations deeply rewarding, and hope that our experiences are useful to others.

摘要

背景

对于致力于解决与边缘化社区相关健康问题的研究生而言,基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法可能是一种合适的探究模式。尽管有许多关于开展传统博士论文(TDD)的实用指南,但针对从事CBPR的学生,类似资源却很匮乏。

目的

借鉴我们自身的经验,我们旨在描述从参与式博士研究中汲取的关键经验教训。此外,本文为那些可能正在考虑或已经在进行CBPR博士论文的人概述了6条建议。这些建议源自我们自己项目中所采用的CBPR过程要素。

经验教训

在反思我们开展CBPR博士论文的经历时,我们确定了4条经验教训:(1)理解TDD与CBPR方法之间的差异;(2)意识到并能够清晰阐述CBPR博士论文的优势;(3)认识到并为CBPR博士研究可能面临的挑战制定计划;(4)认识到CBPR过程中有助于博士项目成功完成的方面。

结论

本文基于我们在CBPR项目中的自身经验,为博士生提供了额外的资源。尽管存在许多障碍和挑战,但我们发现参与CBPR博士论文的过程非常有意义,并希望我们的经验对其他人有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验