Suppr超能文献

如何在床边引入医学伦理学——影响伦理决策模型实施的因素

How to introduce medical ethics at the bedside - Factors influencing the implementation of an ethical decision-making model.

作者信息

Meyer-Zehnder Barbara, Albisser Schleger Heidi, Tanner Sabine, Schnurrer Valentin, Vogt Deborah R, Reiter-Theil Stella, Pargger Hans

机构信息

Department of Clinical Ethics, Psychiatric Hospitals and University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Wilhelm Klein-Strasse 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.

Department for Anesthesia, Surgical Intensive Care, Prehospital Emergency Medicine and Pain Therapy, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0174-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the implementation of new approaches and procedures of medical ethics is as complex and resource-consuming as in other fields, strategies and activities must be carefully planned to use the available means and funds responsibly. Which facilitators and barriers influence the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model in daily routine? Up to now, there has been little examination of these factors in this field.

METHODS

A medical ethics decision-making model called METAP was introduced on three intensive care units and two geriatric wards. An evaluation study was performed from 7 months after deployment of the project until two and a half years. Quantitative and qualitative methods including a questionnaire, semi-structured face-to-face and group-interviews were used.

RESULTS

Sixty-three participants from different professional groups took part in 33 face-to-face and 9 group interviews, and 122 questionnaires could be analysed. The facilitating factors most frequently mentioned were: acceptance and presence of the model, support given by the medical and nursing management, an existing or developing (explicit) ethics culture, perception of a need for a medical ethics decision-making model, and engaged staff members. Lack of presence and acceptance, insufficient time resources and staff, poor inter-professional collaboration, absence of ethical competence, and not recognizing ethical problems were identified as inhibiting the implementation of the METAP model. However, the results of the questionnaire as well as of explicit inquiry showed that the respondents stated to have had enough time and staff available to use METAP if necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Facilitators and barriers of the implementation of a medical ethics decision-making model are quite similar to that of medical guidelines. The planning for implementing an ethics model or guideline can, therefore, benefit from the extensive literature and experience concerning the implementation of medical guidelines. Lack of time and staff can be overcome when people are convinced that the benefits justify the effort.

摘要

背景

由于医学伦理新方法和程序的实施与其他领域一样复杂且资源消耗大,因此必须精心规划策略和活动,以负责任地利用现有资源和资金。哪些促进因素和障碍会影响医学伦理决策模型在日常工作中的实施?到目前为止,该领域对这些因素的研究很少。

方法

在三个重症监护病房和两个老年病房引入了一种名为METAP的医学伦理决策模型。从项目部署7个月后到两年半进行了一项评估研究。使用了定量和定性方法,包括问卷调查、半结构化面对面访谈和小组访谈。

结果

来自不同专业组的63名参与者参加了33次面对面访谈和9次小组访谈,122份问卷可以进行分析。最常提到的促进因素是:模型的接受度和存在情况、医疗和护理管理层给予的支持、现有的或正在发展的(明确的)伦理文化、对医学伦理决策模型的需求认知以及积极参与的工作人员。缺乏存在和接受度、时间资源和工作人员不足、跨专业协作不佳、缺乏伦理能力以及未认识到伦理问题被确定为阻碍METAP模型实施的因素。然而,问卷调查以及明确询问的结果表明,受访者表示如有必要,他们有足够的时间和人员来使用METAP。

结论

医学伦理决策模型实施的促进因素和障碍与医学指南的情况非常相似。因此,实施伦理模型或指南的规划可以受益于有关医学指南实施的大量文献和经验。当人们相信收益值得付出努力时,时间和人员不足的问题是可以克服的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1720/5324224/dba485170a70/12910_2017_174_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验