• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培训护士在姑息治疗机构中促进和实施 CURA:混合学习计划的制定和评估。

Training nurses to facilitate and implement CURA in palliative care institutions: development and evaluation of a blended learning program.

机构信息

Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Oct 21;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01284-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12904-023-01284-4
PMID:37865740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10590004/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals in palliative care are found to be confronted with moral challenges on a frequent basis. CURA is a low-threshold instrument for dialogical ethical reflection that was developed to deal with these challenges. A previous study identified the need of healthcare professionals to be trained to introduce CURA in their organization, initiate and facilitate reflections with CURA, and contribute to the implementation of CURA. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a training for professionals to become 'CURA-ambassadors'.

METHODS

The training was developed in a participatory way in two cycles. We trained 72 healthcare professionals. The training was evaluated by means of a questionnaire and six semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

The study resulted in a blended learning training combining training sessions with an e-module and with practicing with organizing and facilitating CURA in daily healthcare practice. The main objectives of the training are to enable CURA-ambassadors to introduce CURA within their organization, initiate and facilitate ethical reflections using CURA, and contribute to the implementation of CURA. Participants were generally positive about the training program and the trainers. Technical difficulties related to the e-module were mentioned as main point of improvement.

DISCUSSION

The training program can generate ownership, responsibility, and competency among CURA-ambassadors, which are essential foundations for implementing complex interventions in healthcare practice. The training program received positive evaluations shortly after completing the program. This study adds to our understanding of what is needed for healthcare professionals to use CURA, in order to support them in dealing with moral challenges and to foster their moral resilience. Further research is needed to assess whether participants experience the training as sufficient and effective when using and implementing CURA structurally in their organizations over a longer period of time.

摘要

背景

姑息治疗中的医疗保健专业人员经常面临道德挑战。CURA 是一种用于对话伦理反思的低门槛工具,旨在应对这些挑战。先前的研究表明,医疗保健专业人员需要接受培训,以便在其组织中引入 CURA,用 CURA 发起和促进反思,并为 CURA 的实施做出贡献。本研究旨在开发和评估一种培训,以培养“CURA 大使”。

方法

该培训以参与式的方式在两个周期内进行。我们培训了 72 名医疗保健专业人员。通过问卷调查和六次半结构化访谈评估培训。

结果

该研究产生了一种混合学习培训,将培训课程与电子模块相结合,并在日常医疗实践中组织和促进 CURA 的实践相结合。培训的主要目标是使 CURA 大使能够在其组织中引入 CURA,使用 CURA 发起和促进伦理反思,并为 CURA 的实施做出贡献。参与者对培训计划和培训师普遍持积极态度。提到电子模块的技术困难是主要的改进点。

讨论

培训计划可以在 CURA 大使中产生所有权、责任和能力,这是在医疗保健实践中实施复杂干预的必要基础。培训计划在完成后不久就获得了积极评价。本研究增加了我们对医疗保健专业人员使用 CURA 所需的理解,以支持他们应对道德挑战并培养他们的道德韧性。需要进一步研究,以评估参与者在更长时间内将 CURA 结构地用于其组织中时,是否认为培训是充分和有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/5ebd8a5e6bcd/12904_2023_1284_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/3878ba11216d/12904_2023_1284_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/0c20d4cc4a34/12904_2023_1284_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/a2d3055de839/12904_2023_1284_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/645f57232635/12904_2023_1284_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/5ebd8a5e6bcd/12904_2023_1284_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/3878ba11216d/12904_2023_1284_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/0c20d4cc4a34/12904_2023_1284_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/a2d3055de839/12904_2023_1284_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/645f57232635/12904_2023_1284_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e41/10590004/5ebd8a5e6bcd/12904_2023_1284_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Training nurses to facilitate and implement CURA in palliative care institutions: development and evaluation of a blended learning program.培训护士在姑息治疗机构中促进和实施 CURA:混合学习计划的制定和评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2023 Oct 21;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01284-4.
2
CURA-An Ethics Support Instrument for Nurses in Palliative Care. Feasibility and First Perceived Outcomes.CURA-一种用于姑息治疗护士的伦理支持工具。可行性和最初感知到的结果。
HEC Forum. 2023 Jun;35(2):139-159. doi: 10.1007/s10730-021-09456-6. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
3
CURA: A clinical ethics support instrument for caregivers in palliative care.《CURA:姑息治疗护理人员的临床伦理支持工具》。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(7-8):1562-1577. doi: 10.1177/09697330221074014. Epub 2022 May 27.
4
Effectiveness of CURA: Healthcare professionals' moral resilience and moral competences.CURA 的有效性:医疗保健专业人员的道德韧性和道德能力。
Nurs Ethics. 2024 Sep;31(6):1140-1155. doi: 10.1177/09697330231218344. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Participatory development of CURA, a clinical ethics support instrument for palliative care.姑息治疗临床伦理支持工具CURA的参与式开发。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 23;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00772-1.
6
The Diversity Compass: a clinical ethics support instrument for dialogues on diversity in healthcare organizations.多样性指南针:一种临床伦理支持工具,用于医疗保健组织中关于多样性的对话。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jan 3;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00992-z.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitator of moral case deliberation.在实践中学习。培训医疗保健专业人员成为道德案例审议的促进者。
HEC Forum. 2015 Mar;27(1):47-59. doi: 10.1007/s10730-014-9251-7.
10
Helping patients prepare their dependent children for parental death: mixed-methods evaluation of a codeveloped training programme for palliative and allied healthcare professionals in the UK.帮助患者为其未成年子女做好父母去世的准备:为英国姑息治疗和联合医疗保健专业人员共同制定的培训计划的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 9;14(5):e081775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081775.

本文引用的文献

1
CURA: A clinical ethics support instrument for caregivers in palliative care.《CURA:姑息治疗护理人员的临床伦理支持工具》。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(7-8):1562-1577. doi: 10.1177/09697330221074014. Epub 2022 May 27.
2
Participatory development of CURA, a clinical ethics support instrument for palliative care.姑息治疗临床伦理支持工具CURA的参与式开发。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 23;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00772-1.
3
Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review.
支持医疗保健中伦理能力学习的伦理教育:综合系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 19;23(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00766-z.
4
CURA-An Ethics Support Instrument for Nurses in Palliative Care. Feasibility and First Perceived Outcomes.CURA-一种用于姑息治疗护士的伦理支持工具。可行性和最初感知到的结果。
HEC Forum. 2023 Jun;35(2):139-159. doi: 10.1007/s10730-021-09456-6. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Circumstances Related to Moral Distress in Palliative Care: An Integrative Review.姑息治疗中与道德困境相关的情况:综合述评。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1391-1397. doi: 10.1177/1049909120978826. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
6
"Teach for ethics in palliative care": a mixed-method evaluation of a medical ethics training programme.“姑息治疗中的伦理教学”:一项医学伦理培训计划的混合方法评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Sep 25;19(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00653-7.
7
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
8
E-learning in a new era: enablers and barriers to its implementation in nursing.新时代的电子学习:在护理中实施电子学习的促成因素和障碍。
Br J Community Nurs. 2020 Jun 2;25(6):272-275. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2020.25.6.272.
9
Change Management in Health Care.医疗保健中的变革管理。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2020 Apr/Jun;39(2):50-65. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000290.
10
Implementing ethics reflection groups in hospitals: an action research study evaluating barriers and promotors.在医院实施伦理反思小组:一项评估障碍和促进因素的行动研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 16;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0387-5.