Christmann Corinna Anna, Hoffmann Alexandra, Bleser Gabriele
Junior research group wearHEALTH, Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 23;5(2):e22. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6471.
Chronic stress has been shown to be associated with disease. This link is not only direct but also indirect through harmful health behavior such as smoking or changing eating habits. The recent mHealth trend offers a new and promising approach to support the adoption and maintenance of appropriate stress management techniques. However, only few studies have dealt with the inclusion of evidence-based content within stress management apps for mobile phones.
The aim of this study was to evaluate stress management apps on the basis of a new taxonomy of effective emotion-focused stress management techniques and an established taxonomy of behavior change techniques.
Two trained and independent raters evaluated 62 free apps found in Google Play with regard to 26 behavior change and 15 emotion-focused stress management techniques in October 2015.
The apps included an average of 4.3 behavior change techniques (SD 4.2) and 2.8 emotion-focused stress management techniques (SD 2.6). The behavior change technique score and stress management technique score were highly correlated (r=.82, P=.01).
The broad variation of different stress management strategies found in this sample of apps goes in line with those found in conventional stress management interventions and self-help literature. Moreover, this study provided a first step toward more detailed and standardized taxonomies, which can be used to investigate evidence-based content in stress management interventions and enable greater comparability between different intervention types.
慢性应激已被证明与疾病有关。这种联系不仅是直接的,还通过吸烟或改变饮食习惯等有害健康行为间接产生。最近的移动健康趋势提供了一种新的、有前景的方法来支持采用和维持适当的压力管理技巧。然而,只有少数研究涉及在手机压力管理应用程序中纳入循证内容。
本研究的目的是基于有效的情绪聚焦压力管理技巧的新分类法和既定的行为改变技巧分类法,对压力管理应用程序进行评估。
2015年10月,两名经过培训的独立评估人员对在谷歌应用商店中找到的62款免费应用程序,就26种行为改变技巧和15种情绪聚焦压力管理技巧进行了评估。
这些应用程序平均包含4.3种行为改变技巧(标准差4.2)和2.8种情绪聚焦压力管理技巧(标准差2.6)。行为改变技巧得分与压力管理技巧得分高度相关(r = 0.82,P = 0.01)。
在该应用程序样本中发现的不同压力管理策略的广泛差异与传统压力管理干预措施和自助文献中的情况一致。此外,本研究朝着更详细和标准化的分类法迈出了第一步,可用于调查压力管理干预措施中的循证内容,并提高不同干预类型之间的可比性。