Pino-Bodas R, Pérez-Vargas I, Stenroos S, Ahti T, Burgaz A R
Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife 38071, Canary Islands, Spain.
Persoonia. 2016 Dec;37:1-12. doi: 10.3767/003158516X688081. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
The complex belongs to the section and is formed by , and These species are basically distributed in the Mediterranean and Macaronesian Regions. In the present work the limits between the species of this complex are re-examined. To this end, the morphological characters were studied along with the secondary metabolites and the DNA sequences from three loci (ITS rDNA, IGS rDNA and ). The morphological data were studied by principal component analysis (PCA), while the DNA sequences were analyzed using several approaches available to delimit species: genealogical concordance phylogenetic species recognition, species tree (BEAST* and spedeSTEM) and cohesion species recognition. In addition, the genealogical sorting index was used in order to assess the monophyly of the species. The different procedures used in our study turned out to be highly congruent with respect to the limits they establish, but these limits are not the ones separating the prior species. Either the morphological analysis or the different approaches to species delimitation indicate that is a different species from , while and , which are reduced to synonyms of , constitute a separate lineage.
该复合体属于某一分类单元,由[具体物种1]、[具体物种2]和[具体物种3]组成。这些物种主要分布在地中海和马卡罗尼西亚地区。在本研究中,重新审视了该复合体各物种之间的界限。为此,研究了形态特征、次生代谢产物以及来自三个基因座(ITS rDNA、IGS rDNA和[具体基因座3])的DNA序列。通过主成分分析(PCA)研究形态数据,同时使用多种可用于界定物种的方法分析DNA序列:谱系一致性系统发育物种识别、物种树(BEAST*和spedeSTEM)以及凝聚种识别。此外,使用谱系分选指数来评估物种的单系性。我们研究中使用的不同程序在它们所确定的界限方面高度一致,但这些界限并非先前物种的划分界限。形态分析或物种界定的不同方法均表明,[具体物种1]与[具体物种2]是不同的物种,而[具体物种3]和[具体物种4]被归为[具体物种2]的同义词,构成一个单独的谱系。