Cagle John C, Reinhall Per G, Hafner Brian J, Sanders Joan E
Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 3720 15th Avenue NE, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195 e-mail:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Stevens Way, Box 352600, Seattle, WA 98195 e-mail:
J Biomech Eng. 2017 Apr 1;139(4):0450011-04500112. doi: 10.1115/1.4035917.
A set of protocols was created to characterize prosthetic liners across six clinically relevant material properties. Properties included compressive elasticity, shear elasticity, tensile elasticity, volumetric elasticity, coefficient of friction (CoF), and thermal conductivity. Eighteen prosthetic liners representing the diverse range of commercial products were evaluated to create test procedures that maximized repeatability, minimized error, and provided clinically meaningful results. Shear and tensile elasticity test designs were augmented with finite element analysis (FEA) to optimize specimen geometries. Results showed that because of the wide range of available liner products, the compressive elasticity and tensile elasticity tests required two test maxima; samples were tested until they met either a strain-based or a stress-based maximum, whichever was reached first. The shear and tensile elasticity tests required that no cyclic conditioning be conducted because of limited endurance of the mounting adhesive with some liner materials. The coefficient of friction test was based on dynamic coefficient of friction, as it proved to be a more reliable measurement than static coefficient of friction. The volumetric elasticity test required that air be released beneath samples in the test chamber before testing. The thermal conductivity test best reflected the clinical environment when thermal grease was omitted and when liner samples were placed under pressure consistent with load bearing conditions. The developed procedures provide a standardized approach for evaluating liner products in the prosthetics industry. Test results can be used to improve clinical selection of liners for individual patients and guide development of new liner products.
创建了一套方案,以表征六种临床相关材料特性的假肢衬垫。这些特性包括压缩弹性、剪切弹性、拉伸弹性、体积弹性、摩擦系数(CoF)和热导率。对代表各种商业产品的18种假肢衬垫进行了评估,以创建能够最大限度提高可重复性、最小化误差并提供具有临床意义结果的测试程序。通过有限元分析(FEA)增强了剪切和拉伸弹性测试设计,以优化试样几何形状。结果表明,由于现有衬垫产品种类繁多,压缩弹性和拉伸弹性测试需要两个测试最大值;对样品进行测试,直到它们达到基于应变或基于应力的最大值,以先达到者为准。由于某些衬垫材料的安装粘合剂耐久性有限,剪切和拉伸弹性测试要求不进行循环调节。摩擦系数测试基于动态摩擦系数,因为它被证明是比静态摩擦系数更可靠的测量方法。体积弹性测试要求在测试前在测试室内的样品下方释放空气。当省略导热油脂且衬垫样品在与承重条件一致的压力下放置时,热导率测试最能反映临床环境。所制定的程序为假肢行业评估衬垫产品提供了一种标准化方法。测试结果可用于改善个体患者衬垫的临床选择,并指导新衬垫产品的开发。