Ali Sadeeq, Osman Noor Azuan Abu, Mortaza Niyousha, Eshraghi Arezoo, Gholizadeh Hossein, Wan Abas Wan Abu Bakar Bin
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2012 Nov;27(9):943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.06.004. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
The interface pressure between the residual limb and prosthetic socket has a significant effect on an amputee's satisfaction and comfort. Liners provide a comfortable interface by adding a soft cushion between the residual limb and the socket. The Dermo and the Seal-In X5 liner are two new interface systems and, due to their relative infancy, very little are known about their effect on patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to compare the interface pressure with these two liners and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Nine unilateral transtibial amputees participated in the study. Two prostheses were fabricated for each amputee, one with the Seal-In liner and one with the Dermo liner. Interface pressure was measured at the anterior, posterior, medial and lateral regions during walking on the level ground. Each subject filled in a Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) regarding the satisfaction with the two liners. Findings The mean peak pressures with the Seal-In liner was 34.0% higher at the anterior, 24.0% higher at the posterior and 7.0% higher at the medial regions of the socket (P=0.008, P=0.046, P=0.025) than it was with the Dermo Liner. There were no significant differences in the mean peak pressures between the two liners at the lateral regions. In addition, significant difference was found between the two liners both for satisfaction and problems (P<0.05). Interpretation There was less interface pressure between the socket and the residual limb with the Dermo liner. The results indicated that the Dermo liner provides more comfort in the socket than the Seal-In liner.
残肢与假肢接受腔之间的界面压力对截肢者的满意度和舒适度有显著影响。内衬通过在残肢和接受腔之间添加柔软垫层来提供舒适的界面。Dermo和Seal-In X5内衬是两种新型界面系统,由于它们相对较新,关于它们对患者满意度的影响知之甚少。本研究的目的是比较这两种内衬的界面压力及其对患者满意度的影响。
9名单侧胫部截肢者参与了本研究。为每位截肢者制作了两个假肢,一个配有Seal-In内衬,另一个配有Dermo内衬。在平地上行走时,测量前侧、后侧、内侧和外侧区域的界面压力。每位受试者填写一份关于对两种内衬满意度的假肢评估问卷(PEQ)。
与Dermo内衬相比,Seal-In内衬在接受腔前侧的平均峰值压力高34.0%,后侧高24.0%,内侧高7.0%(P = 0.008,P = 0.046,P = 0.025)。在外侧区域,两种内衬的平均峰值压力没有显著差异。此外,在满意度和问题方面,两种内衬之间也存在显著差异(P<0.05)。
Dermo内衬在接受腔与残肢之间产生的界面压力较小。结果表明,Dermo内衬在接受腔中比Seal-In内衬提供更多的舒适度。