Swift-Gallant Ashlyn, Coome Lindsay A, Monks D Ashley, VanderLaan Doug P
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0170241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170241. eCollection 2017.
Developmental theories of the biological basis of sexual orientation suggest that sexually differentiated psychological and behavioural traits should be linked with sexual orientation. Subgroups of gay men delineated by anal sex roles differ according to at least one such trait: gender expression. The present study assessed the hypothesis that handedness, a biologically determined sexually differentiated trait, corresponds to differences in subgroups of gay men based on anal sex role. Furthermore, it assessed whether handedness mediates the association between gender nonconformity and male sexual orientation. Straight and gay men (N = 333) completed the Edinburgh Inventory of Handedness and the Recalled Childhood Gender Nonconformity Scale. Gay men also completed measures of anal sex role preference. As in previous studies, gay men showed greater non-right-handedness and gender nonconformity than straight men. Also, among gay men, bottoms/versatiles (i.e., gay men who take a receptive anal sex role, or who take on both a receptive and insertive anal sex role) were more gender-nonconforming than tops (i.e., gay men who take an insertive anal sex role). In support of the hypothesis, bottoms/versatiles were more non-right-handed than tops and handedness mediated the male sexual orientation and anal sex role differences in Recalled Childhood Gender Nonconformity. Together, these findings suggest that developmental processes linked to handedness underpin variation among men in sexual orientation and gender nonconformity as well as variation among subgroups of gay men that are delineated by anal sex roles.
性取向生物学基础的发展理论表明,性别分化的心理和行为特征应与性取向相关联。根据肛交角色划分的男同性恋亚组至少在一种此类特征上存在差异:性别表达。本研究评估了如下假设:利手(一种由生物学决定的性别分化特征)与基于肛交角色的男同性恋亚组差异相对应。此外,研究还评估了利手是否介导了性别非一致性与男性性取向之间的关联。异性恋和男同性恋男性(N = 333)完成了爱丁堡利手量表和回忆童年性别非一致性量表。男同性恋者还完成了肛交角色偏好测量。与之前的研究一样,男同性恋者比异性恋男性表现出更高的非右利手率和性别非一致性。此外,在男同性恋者中,受插者/多面手(即扮演接受肛交角色或同时扮演接受和插入肛交角色的男同性恋者)比插入者(即扮演插入肛交角色的男同性恋者)在性别上更不符合常规。为支持该假设,受插者/多面手比插入者更倾向于非右利手,且利手介导了回忆童年性别非一致性方面的男性性取向和肛交角色差异。总之,这些发现表明,与利手相关的发育过程是男性性取向和性别非一致性差异以及由肛交角色划分的男同性恋亚组差异的基础。