Wilson Amy Blank, Bonfine Natalie, Farkas Kathleen J, Duda-Banwar Janelle
School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro St, Campus Box 3550, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3550, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 ST. Rt. 44, PO Box 95, Rootstown, OH, 44272, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2017 Nov;53(8):893-900. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0119-6. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
This study explored facilitators and barriers associated with engaging criminogenic interventions in community mental health service settings. Focus groups and guided large group discussions were conducted with 46 consumers, providers and administrators. Results suggest that participants were generally supportive of offering criminogenic interventions to justice involved persons with serious mental illness in community based mental health service settings. Key issues to consider when engaging criminogenic interventions in community mental health service settings include identifying sustainable funding sources, providing adequate training for staff, and tailoring the delivery and pace of the content to the particular treatment needs of SMI participants.
本研究探讨了在社区心理健康服务环境中开展犯罪成因干预措施的促进因素和障碍。对46名消费者、服务提供者和管理人员进行了焦点小组讨论和引导式大型小组讨论。结果表明，参与者普遍支持在社区心理健康服务环境中为患有严重精神疾病且涉及司法问题的人提供犯罪成因干预措施。在社区心理健康服务环境中开展犯罪成因干预措施时需要考虑的关键问题包括确定可持续的资金来源、为工作人员提供充分培训，以及根据严重精神疾病参与者的特定治疗需求调整干预内容的提供方式和节奏。
