The University of Edinburgh.
J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):12-22. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12310. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
Given their backgrounds in classical ethology and in comparative psychology, researchers who study animal personality in biology and psychology, respectively, differ in how they measure personality, what questions they see as important, and how they address these questions. Despite these differences, both comparative psychologists and biologists embrace personality traits. By doing so, they have solved empirical and conceptual problems in animal behavior. Studies of animal personality have provided answers to questions about the evolution of human personality and have presented conceptual and empirical anomalies for sociocognitive theories. Animal personality research does not break from trait theories of personality. Instead, it enriches trait theories by conceiving of traits as not belonging to a species, but as expressed, with some modifications, across species. Broadening trait theory in this way has the potential to further enhance its ability to answer questions related to animal and human personality.
分别从事生物学和心理学动物个性研究的、具有经典行为学和比较心理学背景的研究人员,在个性测量方法、重要问题的看法以及如何解决这些问题方面存在差异。尽管存在这些差异,比较心理学家和生物学家都接受个性特质。这样,他们就解决了动物行为学中的经验和概念问题。动物个性研究为人类个性进化的问题提供了答案,并为社会认知理论提出了概念和经验异常。动物个性研究并没有脱离个性特质理论。相反,它通过将特质理解为不属于一个物种,而是以某种方式在物种间表达,从而丰富了特质理论,只是这种表达需要一些修正。以这种方式拓宽特质理论,有可能进一步增强其回答与动物和人类个性相关问题的能力。