Béjot Y, Guilloteau A, Joux J, Lannuzel A, Mimeau E, Mislin-Tritsch C, Fournel I, Bonithon-Kopp C
Neurology Department and Dijon Stroke Registry, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon.
Bourgogne-Franche-Comté University, Dijon.
Eur J Neurol. 2017 May;24(5):694-702. doi: 10.1111/ene.13271. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
Although there is growing and convincing evidence that socially deprived patients are at higher risk of stroke and worse outcomes, it remains controversial whether or not they suffer more severe stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of social deprivation on initial clinical severity in patients with stroke.
A total of 1536 consecutive patients with an acute first-ever stroke (both ischaemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage) were prospectively enrolled from six French study centers. Stroke severity on admission was measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Social deprivation was assessed at the individual level by the Evaluation de la Précarité et des Inégalités de santé dans les Centres d'Examen de Santé (EPICES) score, a validated multidimensional questionnaire, and several additional single socioeconomic indicators. Polytomous logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between social deprivation and stroke severity.
In univariate analysis, the EPICES score (P = 0.039) and level of education (P = 0.018) were the only two socioeconomic variables associated with stroke severity. Multivariate analysis of the association between EPICES and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores showed that more deprived patients presented a significantly higher risk of both mild and moderate/severe stroke (odds ratio for mild versus minor stroke, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.84; odds ratio for moderate/severe versus minor stroke, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.92). A non-significant trend towards a higher risk of both mild and moderate/severe stroke in less educated patients was observed.
Social deprivation was associated with a more severe clinical presentation in patients with stroke. These findings may contribute to the worse outcome after stroke in deprived patients, and underline the need for strategies to reduce social inequalities for stroke.
尽管越来越多的确凿证据表明,社会经济条件差的患者中风风险更高且预后更差,但他们是否会发生更严重的中风仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估社会经济条件差对中风患者初始临床严重程度的影响。
从六个法国研究中心前瞻性纳入了1536例首次发生急性中风(包括缺血性中风和脑出血)的连续患者。入院时的中风严重程度通过美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分来衡量。社会经济条件差程度通过健康检查中心的健康脆弱性和不平等评估(EPICES)评分(一种经过验证的多维度问卷)以及其他几个单一社会经济指标在个体层面进行评估。进行多分类逻辑回归分析以评估社会经济条件差与中风严重程度之间的关联。
在单因素分析中,EPICES评分(P = 0.039)和教育水平(P = 0.018)是仅有的两个与中风严重程度相关的社会经济变量。对EPICES与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分之间的关联进行多因素分析显示,社会经济条件更差的患者发生轻度和中度/重度中风的风险显著更高(轻度与轻微中风的优势比为1.39;95%置信区间为1.06 - 1.84;中度/重度与轻微中风的优势比为1.44;95%置信区间为1.09 - 1.92)。在受教育程度较低的患者中,观察到发生轻度和中度/重度中风风险更高的非显著趋势。
社会经济条件差与中风患者更严重的临床表现相关。这些发现可能导致社会经济条件差的患者中风后预后更差,并强调需要采取策略减少中风方面的社会不平等。