Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia.
J Environ Manage. 2017 Dec 1;203(Pt 3):1158-1162. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.040. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
Iron and steel are highly important materials used in a wide range of products with important contribution to the economic development. The processes for making iron and steel are energy intensive and known to contribute to local pollution. Deposition of the metals may also have adverse impacts on soil quality, which requires detailed assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of iron and steelmaking facilities on the local soil quality. Soil samples were collected in the vicinity of two steelmaking sites in Australia, one based on blast furnace steelmaking operation, while the second site was based on electric arc furnace steel recycling. The soil samples were compared to a background site where no industrial impact is expected. The soil collected near industrial facilities contained larger toxic metal contents, however this concentration for all priority metals was within the Australian National Environmental Protection Measure guidelines for the acceptable recreational soil quality. When compared to the international soil quality guidelines, some of the soils collected near the industrial sites, particularly near the blast furnace operated steelmaking, exceeded the arsenic, iron and manganese (according to United States Environmental Protection Agency guidelines) and chromium, copper and nickel concentrations (according to the Canadian guidelines). The work further provided a novel environmental assessment model taking into consideration the environmental and health impacts of each element. The environmental assessment revealed most significant contribution of manganese, followed by titanium, zinc, chromium and lead. Titanium was the second most important contributor to the soil quality, however this metal is currently not included in any of the international soil quality guidelines.
钢铁是用途广泛的重要材料,对经济发展有重要贡献。钢铁生产过程能源密集,已知会造成局部污染。金属沉积也可能对土壤质量产生不利影响,需要进行详细评估。本研究旨在调查钢铁制造设施对当地土壤质量的影响。在澳大利亚的两个炼钢地点附近采集了土壤样本,一个基于高炉炼钢操作,另一个基于电弧炉钢回收。将土壤样本与预计没有工业影响的背景地点进行了比较。在工业设施附近采集的土壤中含有更多的有毒金属,但所有优先金属的浓度均在澳大利亚国家环境保护措施规定的可接受的娱乐土壤质量指南范围内。与国际土壤质量指南相比,一些在工业场地附近采集的土壤,特别是在高炉炼钢附近采集的土壤,超过了砷、铁和锰(根据美国环境保护署的指南)以及铬、铜和镍的浓度(根据加拿大的指南)。这项工作还提供了一种新颖的环境评估模型,考虑了每个元素的环境和健康影响。环境评估显示,锰的贡献最大,其次是钛、锌、铬和铅。钛是对土壤质量的第二大重要贡献者,但这种金属目前未被纳入任何国际土壤质量指南。