Bringard Aurélien, Adami Alessandra, Fagoni Nazzareno, Fontolliet Timothée, Lador Frédéric, Moia Christian, Tam Enrico, Ferretti Guido
Département d'Anesthésiologie, Pharmacologie et Soins Intensifs, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, 4 rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, CH-1211, Genève 4, Switzerland.
Département des Neurosciences Fondamentales, Université de Genève, 1 rue Michel Servet, CH-1211, Genève 4, Switzerland.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Apr;117(4):619-630. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3564-6. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
The dynamics of the postulated phenomenon of exercise baroreflex resetting is poorly understood, but can be investigated using closed-loop procedures. To shed light on some mechanisms and temporal relationships participating in the resetting process, we studied the time course of the relationship between the R-R interval (RRi) and arterial pressure with a closed-loop approach.
On ten young volunteers at rest and during light exercise in supine and upright position, we continuously determined, on single-beat basis, RRi (electrocardiography), and arterial pressure (non-invasive finger pressure cuff). From pulse pressure profiles, we determined cardiac output (CO) by Modelflow, computed mean arterial pressure (MAP), and calculated total peripheral resistance (TPR).
At exercise start, RRi was lower than in quiet rest. As exercise started, MAP fell to a minimum (MAP) of 72.8 ± 9.6 mmHg upright and 73.9 ± 6.2 supine, while RRi dropped. The initial RRi versus MAP relationship was linear, with flatter slope than resting baroreflex sensitivity, in both postures. TPR fell and CO increased. After MAP, RRi and MAP varied in opposite direction toward exercise steady state, with further CO increase.
These results suggest that, initially, the MAP fall was corrected by a RRi reduction along a baroreflex curve, with lower sensitivity than at rest, but eventually in the same pressure range as at rest. After attainment of MAP, a second phase started, where the postulated baroreflex resetting might have occurred. In conclusion, the change in baroreflex sensitivity and the resetting process are distinct phenomena, under different control systems.
人们对运动压力反射重调定这一假定现象的动态变化了解甚少,但可通过闭环程序进行研究。为了阐明参与重调定过程的一些机制和时间关系,我们采用闭环方法研究了R-R间期(RRi)与动脉压之间关系的时间进程。
对10名年轻志愿者在静息状态下以及仰卧位和直立位轻度运动期间,我们逐搏连续测定RRi(心电图)和动脉压(无创手指压力袖带)。根据脉压曲线,我们通过模型流法测定心输出量(CO),计算平均动脉压(MAP),并计算总外周阻力(TPR)。
运动开始时,RRi低于安静休息时。运动开始时,直立位MAP降至最低值(MAP)72.8±9.6 mmHg,仰卧位为73.9±6.2 mmHg,同时RRi下降。两种体位下,初始RRi与MAP的关系均为线性,斜率比静息压力反射敏感性更平缓。TPR下降,CO增加。MAP出现后,RRi和MAP朝着运动稳态方向呈相反方向变化,CO进一步增加。
这些结果表明,最初,MAP下降通过RRi沿压力反射曲线降低得到纠正,其敏感性低于静息时,但最终处于与静息时相同的压力范围内。MAP达到后,第二阶段开始,可能发生了假定的压力反射重调定。总之,压力反射敏感性的变化和重调定过程是不同的现象,受不同控制系统的控制。