• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扣带回下区深部脑刺激治疗难治性神经性厌食症:一项开放标签试验的1年随访

Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial.

作者信息

Lipsman Nir, Lam Eileen, Volpini Matthew, Sutandar Kalam, Twose Richelle, Giacobbe Peter, Sodums Devin J, Smith Gwenn S, Woodside D Blake, Lozano Andres M

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Physical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):285-294. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30076-7. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30076-7
PMID:28238701
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anorexia nervosa is a life-threatening illness. Brain circuits believed to drive anorexia nervosa symptoms can be accessed with surgical techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS). Initial results suggest that DBS of the subcallosal cingulate is safe and associated with improvements in mood and anxiety. Here, we investigated the safety, clinical, and neuroimaging outcomes of DBS of the subcallosal cingulate in a group of patients during 12 months of active stimulation.

METHODS

We did this prospective open-label trial at the Department of Surgery of the University of Toronto (Toronto, ON, Canada). Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 20-60 years and had a diagnosis of anorexia nervosa (restricting or binge-purging subtype) and a demonstrated history of chronicity or treatment resistance. Following a period of medical stabilisation, patients underwent surgery for DBS and received open-label continuous stimulation for the entire 1 year study duration. The primary outcome was safety and acceptability of the procedure. The secondary outcomes were body-mass index (BMI), mood, anxiety, affective regulation, and anorexia nervosa-specific behaviours at 12 months after surgery, as well as changes in neural circuitry (measured with PET imaging of cerebral glucose metabolism at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after surgery). This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01476540.

FINDINGS

16 patients with treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa were enrolled between September, 2011, and January, 2014, and underwent DBS of the subcallosal cingulate between November, 2011, and April, 2014. Patients had a mean age of 34 years (SD 8) and average illness duration of 18 years (SD 6). Two patients requested that their devices be removed or deactivated during the study, although their reasons for doing so were poorly defined. The most common adverse event was pain related to surgical incision or positioning that required oral analgesics for longer than 3-4 days after surgery (five [31%] of 16 patients). Seven (44%) of 16 patients had serious adverse events, most of which were related to the underlying illness, including electrolyte disturbances. Average BMI at surgery was 13·83 (SD 1·49) and 14 (88%) of the 16 patients had comorbid mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or both. Mean BMI after 12 months of stimulation was 17·34 (SD 3·40; p=0·0009 vs baseline). DBS was associated with significant improvements in measures of depression (mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores 19·40 [SD 6·76] at baseline vs 8·79 [7·64] at 12 months; p=0·00015), anxiety (mean Beck Anxiety Inventory score 38·00 [15·55] vs 27·14 [18·39]; p=0·035), and affective regulation (mean Dysfunction in Emotional Regulation Scale score 131·80 [22·04] vs 104·36 [31·27]; p=0·019). We detected significant changes in cerebral glucose metabolism in key anorexia nervosa-related structures at both 6 months and 12 months of ongoing brain stimulation.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with chronic treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa, DBS is well tolerated and is associated with significant and sustained improvements in affective symptoms, BMI, and changes in neural circuitry at 12 months after surgery.

FUNDING

Klarman Family Foundation Grants Program in Eating Disorders Research and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

摘要

背景

神经性厌食症是一种危及生命的疾病。通过深部脑刺激(DBS)等外科技术可以触及被认为驱动神经性厌食症症状的脑回路。初步结果表明,扣带回下区的DBS是安全的,并且与情绪和焦虑的改善有关。在此,我们研究了一组患者在12个月的积极刺激期间扣带回下区DBS的安全性、临床和神经影像学结果。

方法

我们在加拿大多伦多大学外科系进行了这项前瞻性开放标签试验。年龄在20-60岁之间、被诊断为神经性厌食症(限制型或暴食-清除型)且有慢性病史或治疗抵抗史的患者有资格参与。经过一段时间的医学稳定后,患者接受DBS手术,并在整个1年的研究期间接受开放标签的持续刺激。主要结果是该手术的安全性和可接受性。次要结果是术后12个月时的体重指数(BMI)、情绪、焦虑、情感调节和神经性厌食症特异性行为,以及神经回路的变化(通过手术前、术后6个月和12个月的脑葡萄糖代谢PET成像测量)。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01476540。

结果

2011年9月至2014年1月期间,16例难治性神经性厌食症患者入组,并在2011年11月至2014年4月期间接受了扣带回下区DBS。患者的平均年龄为34岁(标准差8),平均病程为18年(标准差6)。两名患者在研究期间要求移除或停用他们的设备,尽管他们这样做的原因并不明确。最常见的不良事件是与手术切口或定位相关的疼痛,术后需要口服镇痛药超过3-4天(16例患者中有5例[31%])。16例患者中有7例(44%)发生严重不良事件,其中大多数与基础疾病有关,包括电解质紊乱。手术时的平均BMI为13.83(标准差1.49),16例患者中有14例(88%)合并有情绪障碍、焦虑障碍或两者皆有。刺激12个月后的平均BMI为17.34(标准差3.40;与基线相比p=0.0009)。DBS与抑郁测量指标(汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均得分在基线时为19.40[标准差6.76],在12个月时为8.79[7.64];p=0.00015)、焦虑(贝克焦虑量表平均得分38.00[15.55]对27.14[18.39];p=0.035)和情感调节(情绪调节障碍量表平均得分131.80[22.04]对104.36[31.27];p=0.019)的显著改善有关。在持续脑刺激的6个月和12个月时,我们在关键的神经性厌食症相关结构中检测到脑葡萄糖代谢的显著变化。

解读

在慢性难治性神经性厌食症患者中,DBS耐受性良好,并且与术后12个月时情感症状、BMI和神经回路变化的显著且持续改善有关。

资助

克拉曼家族基金会饮食失调研究资助计划和加拿大卫生研究院。

相似文献

1
Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial.扣带回下区深部脑刺激治疗难治性神经性厌食症:一项开放标签试验的1年随访
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):285-294. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30076-7. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
2
Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial.扣带回下回深部脑刺激治疗难治性神经性厌食症:一项 1 期初步试验
Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1361-1370. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62188-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
3
Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: A long-term follow-up study.伏隔核深部脑刺激治疗难治性神经性厌食症:一项长期随访研究。
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):643-649. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
4
Cognitive and quality-of-life related factors of body mass index (BMI) improvement after deep brain stimulation in the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in treatment-refractory chronic anorexia nervosa.治疗抵抗性慢性神经性厌食症患者经扣带回下脚和伏隔核深部脑刺激后体重指数(BMI)改善的认知和生活质量相关因素。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2022 Jul;30(4):353-363. doi: 10.1002/erv.2895. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
5
Deep-brain stimulation for anorexia nervosa.深部脑刺激治疗神经性厌食症。
World Neurosurg. 2013 Sep-Oct;80(3-4):S29.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.039. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
6
Subcallosal Cingulate Connectivity in Anorexia Nervosa Patients Differs From Healthy Controls: A Multi-tensor Tractography Study.神经性厌食症患者的扣带下回连接与健康对照组不同:一项多张量纤维束追踪研究。
Brain Stimul. 2015 Jul-Aug;8(4):758-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 21.
7
Effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa and Obesity: A Systematic Review.深部脑刺激治疗神经性厌食症和肥胖症的疗效:系统评价。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.114. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
8
Safety and efficacy of dual-lead thalamic deep brain stimulation for patients with treatment-refractory multiple sclerosis tremor: a single-centre, randomised, single-blind, pilot trial.双侧丘脑深部脑刺激治疗难治性多发性硬化震颤的安全性和有效性:单中心、随机、单盲、初步试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Sep;16(9):691-700. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30166-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a multisite, randomised, sham-controlled trial.扣带回下深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症:一项多中心、随机、假手术对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;4(11):839-849. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30371-1. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
10
A Randomized Trial of Deep Brain Stimulation to the Subcallosal Cingulate and Nucleus Accumbens in Patients with Treatment-Refractory, Chronic, and Severe Anorexia Nervosa: Initial Results at 6 Months of Follow Up.难治性、慢性和重度神经性厌食症患者扣带回下束和伏隔核深部脑刺激的随机试验:6个月随访的初步结果
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 22;9(6):1946. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061946.

引用本文的文献

1
What influences food choices in anorexia nervosa? Disentangling cognitive and emotional components of decision-making by translational research.神经性厌食症中是什么影响了食物选择?通过转化研究厘清决策的认知和情感成分。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Jun 22;3:104080. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104080. eCollection 2024.
2
Seizure incidence after deep brain stimulation: a meta-analysis of risk factors and target-specific outcomes in non-epileptic disorders.脑深部电刺激术后癫痫发作发生率:非癫痫性疾病危险因素及靶点特异性结局的荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jul 14;48(1):566. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03727-3.
3
Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in adult patients suffering from severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (STIMARS): protocol for a pilot study.
伏隔核深部脑刺激治疗成年重度及持续性神经性厌食症(STIMARS):一项试点研究方案
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 20;16:1554346. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1554346. eCollection 2025.
4
Biological treatments for co-occurring eating disorders and psychological trauma: a systematic review.共病饮食失调与心理创伤的生物治疗:一项系统综述。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 21;16:1523269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1523269. eCollection 2025.
5
Why does invasive brain stimulation sometimes improve memory and sometimes impair it?为什么侵入性脑刺激有时能改善记忆,有时却会损害记忆?
PLoS Biol. 2024 Oct 25;22(10):e3002894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002894. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Structural connectivity modifications following deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate and nucleus accumbens in severe anorexia nervosa.严重神经性厌食症患者扣带回下脚和伏隔核深部脑刺激后的结构连接改变。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Sep 12;166(1):364. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06258-w.
7
Clinical and scientific review of severe and enduring anorexia nervosa in intensive care settings: introducing an innovative treatment paradigm.重症监护环境下严重且持续性神经性厌食症的临床与科学综述:引入创新治疗模式
J Eat Disord. 2024 Sep 3;12(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01079-9.
8
Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy and exposure-response prevention on brain activation in obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: systematic review and meta-analysis.认知行为疗法和暴露反应预防对强迫症患者大脑激活的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01852-6.
9
Neurosurgical neuromodulation therapy for psychiatric disorders.神经外科神经调节治疗精神障碍。
Neurotherapeutics. 2024 Apr;21(3):e00366. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00366. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
10
Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: role of imaging in identifying/confirming DBS targets, predicting, and optimizing outcome and unravelling mechanisms of action.深部脑刺激治疗精神疾病:影像学在识别/确认深部脑刺激靶点、预测和优化疗效以及揭示作用机制中的作用
Psychoradiology. 2021 Oct 4;1(3):118-151. doi: 10.1093/psyrad/kkab012. eCollection 2021 Sep.