Borrusso Patricia, Quinlan Jennifer J
Department of Nutrition Sciences, Drexel University, 1505 Race St., Mail Stop 1030, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA.
Foods. 2013 Dec 4;2(4):572-584. doi: 10.3390/foods2040572.
Research suggests that consumers often mishandle food in the home based on survey and observation studies. There is a need for a standardized tool for researchers to objectively evaluate the prevalence and identify the nature of food safety risks in the domestic environment. An audit tool was developed to measure compliance with recommended sanitation, refrigeration and food storage conditions in the domestic kitchen. The tool was piloted by four researchers who independently completed the inspection in 22 homes. Audit tool questions were evaluated for reliability using the κ statistic. Questions that were not sufficiently reliable (κ < 0.5) or did not provide direct evidence of risk were revised or eliminated from the final tool. Piloting the audit tool found good reliability among 18 questions, 6 questions were revised and 28 eliminated, resulting in a final 24 question tool. The audit tool was able to identify potential food safety risks, including evidence of pest infestation (27%), incorrect refrigeration temperature (73%), and lack of hot water (>43 °C, 32%). The audit tool developed here provides an objective measure for researchers to observe and record the most prevalent food safety risks in consumer's kitchens and potentially compare risks among consumers of different demographics.
研究表明,根据调查和观察研究,消费者在家中经常对食物处理不当。研究人员需要一种标准化工具,以便客观地评估家庭环境中食品安全风险的发生率并确定其性质。开发了一种审计工具,用于衡量家庭厨房中对推荐的卫生、冷藏和食物储存条件的遵守情况。该工具由四名研究人员进行试点,他们在22户家庭中独立完成了检查。使用κ统计量对审计工具的问题进行可靠性评估。可靠性不足(κ<0.5)或未提供风险直接证据的问题在最终工具中进行了修订或删除。对审计工具进行试点后发现,18个问题具有良好的可靠性,6个问题进行了修订,28个问题被删除,最终形成了一个包含24个问题的工具。该审计工具能够识别潜在的食品安全风险,包括害虫侵扰迹象(27%)、冷藏温度不正确(73%)以及缺乏热水(>43°C,32%)。此处开发的审计工具为研究人员提供了一种客观的方法,用于观察和记录消费者厨房中最普遍的食品安全风险,并有可能比较不同人口统计学特征消费者之间的风险。