• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sorting it out: Eliciting consumer priorities for recovery in supportive housing.理清头绪:确定消费者在支持性住房中恢复的优先事项。
Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2016;19(3):223-234. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2016.1197862. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
2
Eliciting Life Priorities of Older Adults Living in Permanent Supportive Housing.挖掘居住在永久性支持性住房中的老年人的生活优先事项。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):60-68. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz040.
3
Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula.向消费者学习:一项关于澳大利亚心理健康消费者对以康复为导向课程的优先事项的电子德尔菲研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Dec;65(6):586-597. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12518. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
4
Canadian community mental health workers' perceived priorities for supportive housing services in northern and rural contexts.加拿大社区心理健康工作者对北部和农村地区支持性住房服务的优先认知。
Health Soc Care Community. 2015 Nov;23(6):632-41. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12187. Epub 2015 Feb 8.
5
Case Manager Perspectives on the Role of Treatment in Supportive Housing for People with Severe Mental Illness.病例管理者对治疗在重度精神疾病患者支持性住房中的作用的看法。
J Soc Social Work Res. 2016 Fall;7(3):507-525. doi: 10.1086/687986. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Consumer perspectives on recovery: a focus on housing following discharge from hospital.消费者对康复的看法:聚焦出院后的住房问题。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Dec;17(6):402-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00575.x.
7
From Structural Chaos to a Model of Consumer Support: Understanding the Roles of Structure and Agency in Mental Health Recovery for the Formerly Homeless.从结构混乱到消费者支持模式:理解结构与能动性在曾经无家可归者心理健康康复中的作用
J Forensic Psychol Pract. 2012 Jul 1;12(4):325-348. doi: 10.1080/15228932.2012.695656. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
8
What is "Support" in Supportive Housing: Client and Service Providers' Perspectives.支持性住房中的“支持”是什么:客户与服务提供者的观点
Hum Organ. 2013 Fall;72(3):254-262. doi: 10.17730/humo.72.3.x13112p2u238m8mw.
9
Consumer participation in housing: reflecting on consumer preferences.消费者在住房方面的参与:对消费者偏好的反思。
Australas Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;18(6):579-83. doi: 10.3109/10398562.2010.499432.
10
Housing and Support Narratives of People Experiencing Mental Health Issues: Making My Place, My Home.有心理健康问题者的住房与支持经历:打造我的空间,我的家。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;10:939. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00939. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceiving Ethical Discomfort Triggered by Situations that Resist Meaning in Community Mental Health Settings: A Grounded Theory.在社区心理健康环境中,感知由抗拒意义的情境引发的伦理不适:一项扎根理论
Community Ment Health J. 2025 May;61(4):783-796. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01415-y. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
2
Eliciting Life Priorities of Older Adults Living in Permanent Supportive Housing.挖掘居住在永久性支持性住房中的老年人的生活优先事项。
Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):60-68. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz040.

本文引用的文献

1
The Method of Sorting as a Data-Gathering Procedure in Multivariate Research.多元研究中作为数据收集程序的分类方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1975 Oct 1;10(4):489-502. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1004_7.
2
Service users' priorities and preferences for treatment of psychosis: a user-led Delphi study.服务使用者对精神病治疗的优先事项和偏好:一项由用户主导的德尔菲研究。
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Sep 1;65(9):1167-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300289.
3
Preserving the person: The ethical imperative of recovery-oriented practices.维护人的尊严:以康复为导向的实践的伦理要求。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2014 Mar;84(2):182-9. doi: 10.1037/h0099362.
4
Patient preference for psychological vs pharmacologic treatment of psychiatric disorders: a meta-analytic review.患者对精神障碍心理治疗与药物治疗的偏好:荟萃分析综述。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;74(6):595-602. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12r07757.
5
Core dimensions of recovery: a psychometric analysis.康复的核心维度:一项心理测量分析
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2014 Jul;41(4):535-42. doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0489-1.
6
Predictors of shared decision making and level of agreement between consumers and providers in psychiatric care.精神科护理中共享决策制定的预测因素及消费者和提供者之间的一致性水平。
Community Ment Health J. 2014 May;50(4):375-82. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9584-0. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
7
Impact of person-centered planning and collaborative documentation on treatment adherence.以患者为中心的计划和协作式记录对治疗依从性的影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Jan;64(1):76-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201100489.
8
Preferences for family involvement in care among consumers with serious mental illness.消费者对严重精神疾病患者的家庭参与护理的偏好。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Mar 1;64(3):257-63. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200176.
9
Life course adversity in the lives of formerly homeless persons with serious mental illness: context and meaning.曾无家可归的严重精神疾病患者生活中的生命历程逆境:背景与意义。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Jul;82(3):421-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01159.x.
10
Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods.健康经济学和卫生服务研究中的有序偏好 elicitation 方法:使用离散选择实验和排序方法。
Br Med Bull. 2012 Sep;103(1):21-44. doi: 10.1093/bmb/lds020. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

理清头绪:确定消费者在支持性住房中恢复的优先事项。

Sorting it out: Eliciting consumer priorities for recovery in supportive housing.

作者信息

Choy-Brown Mimi, Padgett Deborah, Smith Bikki, Tiderington Emmy

机构信息

New York University, Silver School of Social Work, 20 Cooper Square, New York, 10003 United States.

New York University, New York, United States.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatr Rehabil. 2016;19(3):223-234. doi: 10.1080/15487768.2016.1197862. Epub 2016 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1080/15487768.2016.1197862
PMID:28239306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5321566/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to understand participant priorities in their personal recovery journey and their perspectives of recovery domains.

METHODS

A card sort data gathering technique was employed to elicit priorities in recovery from consumers in supportive housing programs serving formerly homeless adults with severe mental illnesses in New York City. Participants (N=38) were asked to sort 12 cards printed with recovery domains in order of importance and describe the meaning attached to each domain.

RESULTS

Mental health (95%), physical health (89%), and housing (92%) were the domains most frequently included and prioritized in the top three rankings. Family (76%) and partner (74%) were also frequently included and endorsed as most important second only to mental health. Housing was prioritized yet rated most important less often (58%). Work, school, hobbies, program, friends and neighborhood were less frequently endorsed. 'Card sort talk' revealed critical understanding of participants' priorities and their reasons for endorsing other domains less frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Most important to participants was regaining functional independence through improved mental and physical health and access to housing. With underlying principles of efficiency and empowerment, card sort is a promising engagement technique for providers to elicit consumer priorities in their own recovery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在了解参与者在个人康复过程中的优先事项以及他们对康复领域的看法。

方法

采用卡片分类数据收集技术,从纽约市为患有严重精神疾病的前无家可归成年人提供支持性住房项目的消费者中,引出康复方面的优先事项。参与者(N = 38)被要求按照重要性对12张印有康复领域的卡片进行排序,并描述每个领域所赋予的含义。

结果

心理健康(95%)、身体健康(89%)和住房(92%)是最常被列入且排在前三位的领域。家庭(76%)和伴侣(74%)也经常被列入并被认可为仅次于心理健康的最重要因素。住房被列为优先事项,但被评为最重要的频率较低(58%)。工作、学校、爱好、项目、朋友和社区被认可的频率较低。“卡片分类讨论”揭示了对参与者优先事项以及他们较少认可其他领域的原因的关键理解。

结论

对参与者来说最重要的是通过改善身心健康和获得住房来重新获得功能独立。基于效率和赋权的基本原则,卡片分类是一种很有前景的参与技术,可供提供者引出消费者在自身康复中的优先事项。