Monnais Laurence
Département d'histoire, Centre d'études de l'Asie de l'est (CETASE) ; Chaire de recherche du Canada sur le pluralisme en santé, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, Succursale Centre-ville, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Med Sci (Paris). 2017 Feb;33(2):183-187. doi: 10.1051/medsci/20173302014. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
At a time of growing interest in integrative approaches to health and care, this article examines, from a historical perspective, the factors underlying the global popularity of so-called complementary and alternative medicines (CAM). Focusing on the multiple and changing meanings of the concepts used with reference to CAM since the nineteenth century, it emphasizes the agency of CAM practitioners' and calls into question a linear progression from outright exclusion to gradual inclusion into mainstream health care systems. This analysis concludes that biomedicine and "other" medical systems have mutually defined each other in a process of co-production that has had a significant impact on the medicalization of contemporary societies from North America to East Asia.
在人们对健康与护理的综合方法兴趣日增之际,本文从历史角度审视了所谓补充和替代医学(CAM)在全球流行的潜在因素。文章聚焦自19世纪以来与补充和替代医学相关概念的多重且不断变化的含义,强调了补充和替代医学从业者的能动性,并对从完全排斥到逐渐纳入主流医疗保健系统的线性发展提出质疑。该分析得出结论,生物医学和“其他”医疗体系在共同生产过程中相互界定,这一过程对从北美到东亚的当代社会的医学化产生了重大影响。