• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植可调节肝硬化患者的肠道微生物失调及认知功能。

Liver transplant modulates gut microbial dysbiosis and cognitive function in cirrhosis.

作者信息

Bajaj Jasmohan S, Fagan Andrew, Sikaroodi Masoumeh, White Melanie B, Sterling Richard K, Gilles HoChong, Heuman Douglas, Stravitz Richard T, Matherly Scott C, Siddiqui Mohammed S, Puri Puneet, Sanyal Arun J, Luketic Velimir, John Binu, Fuchs Michael, Ahluwalia Vishwadeep, Gillevet Patrick M

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University and McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia.

Microbiome Analysis Center, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2017 Jul;23(7):907-914. doi: 10.1002/lt.24754.

DOI:10.1002/lt.24754
PMID:28240840
Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) improves daily function and cognition in patients with cirrhosis, but a subset of patients can remain impaired. Unfavorable microbiota or dysbiosis is observed in patients with cirrhosis, but the effect of LT on microbial composition, especially with poor post-LT cognition, is unclear. The aims were to determine the effect of LT on gut microbiota and to determine whether gut microbiota are associated with cognitive dysfunction after LT. We enrolled outpatient patients with cirrhosis on the LT list and followed them until 6 months after LT. Cognition (Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopathy score [PHES]), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and stool microbiota (multitagged sequencing for diversity and taxa) tests were performed at both visits. Persistent cognitive impairment was defined as a stable/worsening PHES. Both pre-/post-LT data were compared with age-matched healthy controls. We enrolled 45 patients (56 ± 7 years, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score 26 ± 8). They received LT 6 ± 3 months after enrollment and were re-evaluated 7 ± 2 months after LT with a stable course. A significantly improved HRQOL, PHES, with increase in microbial diversity, increase in autochthonous, and decrease in potentially pathogenic taxa were seen after LT compared with baseline. However, there was continued dysbiosis and HRQOL/cognitive impairment after LT compared with controls in 29% who did not improve PHES after LT. In these, Proteobacteria relative abundance was significantly higher and Firmicutes were lower after LT, whereas the reverse occurred in the group that improved. Delta PHES was negatively correlated with delta Proteobacteria and positively with delta Firmicutes. In conclusion, LT improves gut microbiota diversity and dysbiosis compared with pre-LT baseline but residual dysbiosis remains compared with controls. There is cognitive and HRQOL enhancement in general after LT, but a higher Proteobacteria relative abundance change is associated with posttransplant cognitive impairment. Liver Transplantation 23 907-914 2017 AASLD.

摘要

肝移植(LT)可改善肝硬化患者的日常功能和认知能力,但仍有一部分患者会持续存在功能障碍。肝硬化患者中存在不良微生物群或菌群失调的情况,但LT对微生物组成的影响,尤其是对肝移植后认知功能较差患者的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定LT对肠道微生物群的影响,并确定肠道微生物群是否与肝移植后的认知功能障碍有关。我们纳入了等待肝移植的门诊肝硬化患者,并对他们进行随访,直至肝移植后6个月。在两次访视时均进行了认知功能(心理测量肝性脑病评分[PHES])、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和粪便微生物群(多标签测序以评估多样性和分类群)检测。持续性认知障碍定义为PHES稳定/恶化。将肝移植前后的数据与年龄匹配的健康对照进行比较。我们纳入了45例患者(56±7岁,终末期肝病模型评分26±8)。他们在入组后6±3个月接受了肝移植,并在肝移植后7±2个月进行了重新评估,病程稳定。与基线相比,肝移植后HRQOL、PHES显著改善,微生物多样性增加,本土微生物增加,潜在致病分类群减少。然而,与对照组相比,29%肝移植后PHES未改善的患者在肝移植后仍存在持续的菌群失调和HRQOL/认知障碍。在这些患者中,肝移植后变形菌门相对丰度显著升高,厚壁菌门相对丰度降低,而改善组则相反。PHES的变化与变形菌门的变化呈负相关,与厚壁菌门的变化呈正相关。总之,与肝移植前基线相比,肝移植改善了肠道微生物群的多样性和菌群失调,但与对照组相比仍存在残余的菌群失调。肝移植后总体上认知功能和HRQOL有所增强,但变形菌门相对丰度变化较高与移植后认知障碍有关。《肝脏移植》2017年第23卷907 - 914页美国肝病研究学会

相似文献

1
Liver transplant modulates gut microbial dysbiosis and cognitive function in cirrhosis.肝移植可调节肝硬化患者的肠道微生物失调及认知功能。
Liver Transpl. 2017 Jul;23(7):907-914. doi: 10.1002/lt.24754.
2
Alterations in gut microbial function following liver transplant.肝移植后肠道微生物功能的改变。
Liver Transpl. 2018 Jun;24(6):752-761. doi: 10.1002/lt.25046. Epub 2018 May 13.
3
Impaired Gut-Liver-Brain Axis in Patients with Cirrhosis.肝硬化患者肠道-肝脏-脑轴受损
Sci Rep. 2016 May 26;6:26800. doi: 10.1038/srep26800.
4
The relevance of intestinal dysbiosis in liver transplant candidates.肠道菌群失调在肝移植候选者中的相关性。
Transpl Infect Dis. 2015 Apr;17(2):174-84. doi: 10.1111/tid.12352. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
5
Liver Transplant Is Associated with Sustained Improvement in Tandem Gait and Risk of Falls.肝移植与串联步态的持续改善及跌倒风险相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Apr;66(4):1360-1366. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06261-y. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
6
Salivary microbiota reflects changes in gut microbiota in cirrhosis with hepatic encephalopathy.唾液微生物群反映了肝硬化合并肝性脑病患者肠道微生物群的变化。
Hepatology. 2015 Oct;62(4):1260-71. doi: 10.1002/hep.27819. Epub 2015 May 6.
7
Liver transplantation significantly improves global functioning and cerebral processing.肝移植显著改善整体功能和大脑处理能力。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Oct;22(10):1379-90. doi: 10.1002/lt.24498.
8
Association Between Intestinal Microbiota Collected at Hospital Admission and Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis.入院时肠道微生物群与肝硬化患者结局的关系。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;17(4):756-765.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
9
Posttraumatic stress disorder is associated with altered gut microbiota that modulates cognitive performance in veterans with cirrhosis.创伤后应激障碍与肠道微生物群的改变有关,这种改变可调节肝硬化退伍军人的认知功能。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2019 Nov 1;317(5):G661-G669. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00194.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Faecal bacterial microbiota in patients with cirrhosis and the effect of lactulose administration.肝硬化患者的粪便细菌微生物群及乳果糖给药的影响。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0683-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapamycin immunomodulation utilizes time-dependent alterations of lymph node architecture, leukocyte trafficking, and gut microbiome.雷帕霉素免疫调节利用淋巴结结构、白细胞运输和肠道微生物群的时间依赖性改变。
JCI Insight. 2025 Apr 22;10(8). doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.186505.
2
Hepatic encephalopathy as an indication or contraindication to liver transplant?肝性脑病是肝移植的适应证还是禁忌证?
Metab Brain Dis. 2025 Apr 15;40(4):181. doi: 10.1007/s11011-025-01614-w.
3
The Impact of Liver Graft Preservation Method on Longitudinal Gut Microbiome Changes Following Liver Transplant: A Proof-of-concept Study.
肝移植保存方法对肝移植后肠道微生物群纵向变化的影响:一项概念验证研究。
J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2025 Apr 28;13(4):284-294. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2024.00352. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
4
A critical review of microbiome-derived metabolic functions and translational research in liver diseases.微生物群衍生的代谢功能与肝脏疾病转化研究的批判性综述。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Feb 24;15:1488874. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1488874. eCollection 2025.
5
Immunosuppressant imprecision: multidirectional effects on metabolism and microbiome.免疫抑制剂的不精确性:对代谢和微生物群的多向性影响
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Jun 12;38(2):e0017824. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00178-24. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
6
Gut microbiome composition in patients with liver cirrhosis with and without hepatic encephalopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.伴有和不伴有肝性脑病的肝硬化患者的肠道微生物群组成:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World J Hepatol. 2025 Jan 27;17(1):100377. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i1.100377.
7
Gut Microbial Dysbiosis and Implications in Solid Organ Transplantation.肠道微生物失调及其在实体器官移植中的影响
Biomedicines. 2024 Dec 9;12(12):2792. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12122792.
8
Dynamic human gut microbiome and immune shifts during an immersive psychosocial intervention program.沉浸式心理社会干预项目期间动态变化的人类肠道微生物群和免疫变化
Brain Behav Immun. 2025 Mar;125:428-443. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2024.12.027. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
9
Insights of gut-liver axis in hepatic diseases: Mechanisms, clinical implications, and therapeutic potentials.肝病中肠-肝轴的见解:机制、临床意义及治疗潜力
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Nov 5;15(6):98146. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v15.i6.98146.
10
Dynamic Human Gut Microbiome and Immune Shifts During an Immersive Psychosocial Therapeutic Program.沉浸式心理社会治疗项目期间动态变化的人类肠道微生物群和免疫转变
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 27:2024.06.26.600881. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.26.600881.