Bajaj Jasmohan S, Betrapally Naga S, Hylemon Phillip B, Heuman Douglas M, Daita Kalyani, White Melanie B, Unser Ariel, Thacker Leroy R, Sanyal Arun J, Kang Dae Joong, Sikaroodi Masoumeh, Gillevet Patrick M
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University and McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
Microbiome Analysis Center, George Mason University, Manassas, VA.
Hepatology. 2015 Oct;62(4):1260-71. doi: 10.1002/hep.27819. Epub 2015 May 6.
Altered gut microbiome is associated with systemic inflammation and cirrhosis decompensation. However, the correlation of the oral microbiome with inflammation in cirrhosis is unclear. Our aim was to evaluate the oral microbiome in cirrhosis and compare with stool microbiome. Outpatients with cirrhosis (with/without hepatic encephalopathy [HE]) and controls underwent stool/saliva microbiome analysis (for composition and function) and also systemic inflammatory evaluation. Ninety-day liver-related hospitalizations were recorded. Salivary inflammation was studied using T helper 1 cytokines/secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), histatins and lysozyme in a subsequent group. A total of 102 patients with cirrhosis (43 previous HE) and 32 age-matched controls were included. On principal component analysis (PCA), stool and saliva microbiome clustered far apart, showing differences between sites as a whole. In salivary microbiome, with previous HE, relative abundance of autochthonous families decreased whereas potentially pathogenic ones (Enterobacteriaceae, Enterococcaceae) increased in saliva. Endotoxin-related predicted functions were significantly higher in cirrhotic saliva. In stool microbiome, relative autochthonous taxa abundance reduced in previous HE, along with increased Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae. Cirrhotic stool microbiota demonstrated a significantly higher correlation with systemic inflammation, compared to saliva microbiota, on correlation networks. Thirty-eight patients were hospitalized within 90 days. Their salivary dysbiosis was significantly worse and predicted this outcome independent of cirrhosis severity. Salivary inflammation was studied in an additional 86 age-matched subjects (43 controls/43 patients with cirrhosis); significantly higher interleukin (IL)-6/IL-1β, secretory IgA, and lower lysozyme, and histatins 1 and 5 were found in patients with cirrhosis, compared to controls.
Dysbiosis, represented by reduction in autochthonous bacteria, is present in both saliva and stool in patients with cirrhosis, compared to controls. Patients with cirrhosis have impaired salivary defenses and worse inflammation. Salivary dysbiosis was greater in patients with cirrhosis who developed 90-day hospitalizations. These findings could represent a global mucosal-immune interface change in cirrhosis.
肠道微生物群改变与全身炎症和肝硬化失代偿相关。然而,口腔微生物群与肝硬化炎症之间的相关性尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估肝硬化患者的口腔微生物群,并与粪便微生物群进行比较。肝硬化门诊患者(有/无肝性脑病[HE])和对照组接受了粪便/唾液微生物群分析(包括组成和功能)以及全身炎症评估。记录了90天内与肝脏相关的住院情况。随后对另一组患者使用辅助性T细胞1细胞因子/分泌型免疫球蛋白A(IgA)、富组蛋白和溶菌酶研究唾液炎症。共纳入102例肝硬化患者(43例既往有HE)和32例年龄匹配的对照组。在主成分分析(PCA)中,粪便和唾液微生物群聚类相距甚远,总体显示出不同部位之间的差异。在唾液微生物群中,既往有HE的患者,唾液中本土菌属的相对丰度降低,而潜在致病菌(肠杆菌科、肠球菌科)增加。肝硬化唾液中内毒素相关的预测功能显著更高。在粪便微生物群中,既往有HE的患者,本土分类群的相对丰度降低,同时肠杆菌科和肠球菌科增加。在相关性网络中,与唾液微生物群相比,肝硬化粪便微生物群与全身炎症的相关性显著更高。38例患者在90天内住院。他们的唾液生态失调明显更严重,且独立于肝硬化严重程度预测了这一结果。在另外86例年龄匹配的受试者(43例对照组/43例肝硬化患者)中研究了唾液炎症;与对照组相比,肝硬化患者中白细胞介素(IL)-6/IL-1β、分泌型IgA显著更高,溶菌酶以及富组蛋白1和5更低。
与对照组相比,肝硬化患者的唾液和粪便中均存在以本土细菌减少为特征的生态失调。肝硬化患者的唾液防御功能受损,炎症更严重。发生90天住院的肝硬化患者唾液生态失调更严重。这些发现可能代表了肝硬化中一种全身性黏膜免疫界面的变化。