Suppr超能文献

复发和/或难治性多发性骨髓瘤治疗结局的系统文献回顾和网络荟萃分析。

Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcomes in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

机构信息

Chrissy H.Y. van Beurden-Tan and Pieter Sonneveld, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute; Margreet G. Franken, Hedwig M. Blommestein, and Carin A. Uyl-de Groot, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam; and Hedwig M. Blommestein and Carin A. Uyl-de Groot, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1312-1319. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.1663. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

Abstract

Purpose Since 2000, many new treatment options have become available for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) after a long period in which dexamethasone and melphalan had been the standard treatment. Direct comparisons of these novel treatments, however, are lacking. This makes it extremely difficult to evaluate the relative added value of each new treatment. Our aim was to synthesize all efficacy evidence, enabling a comparison of all current treatments for R/R MM. Methods We performed a systematic literature review to identify all publicly available phase III randomized controlled trial evidence. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials, and the Web site www.ClinicalTrials.gov . In addition, two trials presented at two international hematology congresses (ie, ASCO 2016 and European Hematology Association 2016) were added to include the most recent evidence. In total, 17 randomized controlled trials were identified, including 18 treatment options. The evidence was synthesized using a conventional network meta-analysis. To include all treatments within one network, two treatment options were combined: (1) bortezomib monotherapy and bortezomib plus dexamethasone, and (2) thalidomide monotherapy and thalidomide plus dexamethasone. Results The combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone was identified as the best treatment. It was most favorable in terms of (1) hazard ratio for progression-free survival (0.13; 95% credible interval, 0.09 to 0.19), and (2) probability of being best (99% of the simulations). This treatment combination reduced the risk of progression or death by 87% versus dexamethasone, 81% versus bortezomib plus dexamethasone, and 63% versus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Conclusion Our network meta-analysis provides a complete overview of the relative efficacy of all available treatments for R/R MM. Until additional data from randomized studies are available, on the basis of this analysis, the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone seems to be the best treatment option.

摘要

目的

自 2000 年以来,在很长一段时间内,地塞米松和马法兰一直是复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤(R/R MM)的标准治疗方法,此后出现了许多新的治疗选择。然而,这些新疗法的直接比较却缺乏。这使得评估每种新疗法的相对附加值变得极其困难。我们的目的是综合所有疗效证据,以便比较 R/R MM 的所有当前治疗方法。

方法

我们进行了系统的文献回顾,以确定所有公开的 III 期随机对照试验证据。我们在 Embase、MEDLINE、MEDLINE In-Process、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和网站 www.ClinicalTrials.gov 上进行了检索。此外,还将在两次国际血液学大会(即 ASCO 2016 和欧洲血液学协会 2016)上提交的两项试验纳入其中,以纳入最新的证据。总共确定了 17 项随机对照试验,包括 18 种治疗选择。使用常规网络荟萃分析综合证据。为了在一个网络中纳入所有治疗方法,将两种治疗方法合并:(1)硼替佐米单药治疗和硼替佐米联合地塞米松,以及(2)沙利度胺单药治疗和沙利度胺联合地塞米松。

结果

达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松联合治疗被确定为最佳治疗方法。在以下方面最为有利:(1)无进展生存期的危险比(0.13;95%可信区间,0.09 至 0.19),以及(2)最佳概率(模拟的 99%)。与地塞米松相比,该治疗组合使进展或死亡的风险降低了 87%,与硼替佐米联合地塞米松相比降低了 81%,与来那度胺联合地塞米松相比降低了 63%。

结论

我们的网络荟萃分析提供了 R/R MM 所有可用治疗方法相对疗效的全面概述。在有更多随机研究数据可用之前,基于该分析,达雷妥尤单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松联合治疗似乎是最佳治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验